18F-sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET to Replace Bone Scintigraphy: Safety and Efficacy Assessment

February 5, 2024 updated by: Dr Éric E Turcotte, MD, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Open-label Clinical Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of 18F-sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET Imaging in Patients in Need of a Standard 99mTc Bone Scintigraphy

18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) was already investigated numerous times in the last 40 years as a PET alternative to standard 99m-technetium-derived bone scintigraphy. However, lack of universal tracer availability and higher costs contributed to the failure of 18F-NaF to systematically supplant bone scintigraphy as a standard of care.

Recently, an isotope shortage crisis occurred and evidenced the need to have non-reactor-derived alternatives for many nuclear medicine procedures, including bone scintigraphy. Since 18F-NaF is cyclotron-produced, it could become a necessary alternative to bone scintigraphy in case of another worldwide isotope shortage.

The study aims to evaluate the safety profile of 18F-NaF injection. Moreover, a patient registry will be compiled in order to perform sub-studies on 18F-NaF diagnostic performance on diverse bone and articular diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for whom a 99mTc-biphosphonate bone scintigraphy is indicated;
  • Pediatric patients for whom a 99mTc-biphosphonate bone scintigraphy is indicated for oncologic or infectious reasons
  • Able to tolerate supine position
  • Written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable of maintaining supine position for more than 15 minutes
  • Refusal to sign the consent form
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to 18F-NaF or any of its constituants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 18F-NaF eligible patients
Eligibility for 18F-NaF PET scans is the same than for bone scintigraphy routinely prescribed in the clinic.
Intravenous injection of 4 MBq/kg for pediatric patients, or 5 MBq/kg for adult patients (maximum of 555 MBq), followed by a 45 minutes waiting time. Patients is then placed in supine position in a PET/CT scanner for a duration of no more than 30 minutes.
Other Names:
  • 18F-NaF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety profile of 18F-NaF
Time Frame: 17 years
A registry monitoring eventual adverse effects for this radiopharmaceutical agent will be compiled. Usual procedures will be applied to divulgate any serious adverse effects.
17 years
Efficacy profile of 18F-NaF compared to 99mTc-biphosphonate bone scintigraphy
Time Frame: 17 years
Using the patient registry, and in the eventual sub-studies to come, the diagnostic performance of 18F-NaF-PET will be compared to similar available imaging tests, most notably 99mTc-biphosphonate bone scintigraphy.
17 years
Correlate 18F-NaF PET images with pathology reports
Time Frame: 17 years
Pathology data from the diverse conditions eligible for the 18F-NaF PET scan will be also monitored when available. Prognostic value from the imaging data will be compared with those obtained from the pathology.
17 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Éric E Turcotte, MD, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Cancer

Clinical Trials on 18F-sodium fluoride

3
Subscribe