Resilience and Coping in a Rare Skeletal Disease Population to Face Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Distress: a Longitudinal Study (RELOAD)

February 28, 2023 updated by: Luca Sangiorgi, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Exploring Resilience and Coping Strategies of Young Population in Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Outbreak: a Longitudinal Study in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Rare Skeletal Disorders.

In the COVID-19 outbreak context, people living with rare diseases have been highly troubled with anxiety, loneliness, and depression. The project evaluates resilience and coping strategies to address pandemic impact by discussion in a dedicated focus group using a web-based platform. The goal is to improve, in a sustainable manner, the coping skills and psychological well-being of children, adolescents, and young adults affected by rare skeletal diseases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accordingly with the spread and size of the infection.

The restrictions implemented by the governments have substantially changed people's lifestyles, facilitating the emergence of emotions such as fear, anxiety, and a sense of loneliness.

The age groups most involved by these burdens have been childhood, adolescence, and young adults. These groups have experienced dramatic changes in their daily life in order the relational, educational, and social networks. Nonetheless, these links outline the ideal environment for the development of resilience and the promotion of coping strategies to face traumatic events.

These lifestyle challenges and their consequences are even more evident in the context of the rare diseases since the outbreak containment measures have emphasized the troubles with which people affected by these conditions are daily forced to confront, in terms of access to care and treatments, resulting in increased stress and anxiety.

The current phase represents a sensitive step for the resumption of the activities in charge of the health and social service aimed at the citizens and especially to people with special needs, such as people suffering from rare diseases.

The pandemic experience has promoted new forms of meeting and contact between individuals using web-based platforms, playing a fundamental role in preserving the community and "sociality" dimensions.

In this scenario, the rare diseases could be an attractive model since the pandemic impinges over their bio-psycho-social characteristics at different levels. Resilience and coping strategies adopted by rare diseases patients could configure as an exemplum to face the psychological distress resulting from anti-pandemic measures, suggesting new approaches of taking charge by health service.

This study evaluates resilience and coping strategies to address pandemic impact by discussion in a dedicated focus group using a web-based platform. The goal is to improve, in a sustainable manner, the coping skills and psychological well-being of children, adolescents, and young adults affected by rare skeletal diseases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40139
        • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient screening and enrollment will be carried out through:

  • Rare Skeletal Disorders out-patient visit
  • Rare Skeletal Disorders in-patient visit
  • National Patients Organizations

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Multiple osteochondromas; Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Ollier disease/Maffucci syndrome; Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Osteogenesis imperfecta; Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject doesn't match the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resilience
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study
Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low
Evaluation at baseline of the study
Resilience
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 month
Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low
Change from baseline at 3 month
Resilience
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 month
Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low
Change from baseline at 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Evaluation at baseline of the study
Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 month
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Change from baseline at 3 month
Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 month
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Change from baseline at 6 month
Depression
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Evaluation at baseline of the study
Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 month
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Change from baseline at 3 month
Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 month
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15
Change from baseline at 6 month
Loneliness
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study
UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.
Evaluation at baseline of the study
Loneliness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 month
UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.
Change from baseline at 3 month
Loneliness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 month
UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.
Change from baseline at 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luca Sangiorgi, MD, PhD, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta

3
Subscribe