Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters and Intrathecal Morphine for Hepatic Resection

June 6, 2022 updated by: Engy T. Said, MD, University of California, San Diego

Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters: The Role in Acute Postoperative Pain After Hepatic Resection With Intrathecal Morphine

To determine whether the addition of erector spinae plane (ESP) catheters to existing multimodal analgesic regimen with intrathecal morphine provides superior postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hepatic resection compared with patients not receiving ESP catheters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatic resection surgery is especially painful and requires optimal postoperative pain control for early mobilization and improved respiratory function. While there are many options for pain control, including IV opioids and thoracic epidurals, their utility is often limited by decreased metabolism and coagulopathy respectively. Our institution's current regimen including multimodal analgesia combined with intrathecal morphine and physician discretion with ESP catheters to facilitate postoperative pain management. However, the duration of intrathecal morphine is 24 hours, which is not cover the duration of significant post-operative leading to an increase in intravenous opioid consumption. ESP block is a paraspinal fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the thoracic transverse processes blocking the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves. This provides a multi-dermatomal sensory block of the anterior, posterior and lateral thoracic and abdominal walls. The addition of a catheter allows for a continuous infusion of local anesthetic. In addition, unlike a hepatic resection with a thoracic epidural coagulation status is not a concern. We believe that if patients' have improved post-operative pain control they will have better participation in physical therapy, require less opioids and potentially have shorter hospital length of stay.

Specific Aim: To determine if the addition of ESP catheters to multimodal pain regimen with intrathecal morphine, would provide superior postoperative analgesia beyond the morphine's twenty-four hour duration in patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to patients not receiving ESP catheters.

Hypothesis 1: Patients undergoing hepatic resection will have improved postoperative analgesia - based on mean opioid consumption and numeric rating scale pain scores - during postoperative day (POD) 1, as defined by 24 hours after intrathecal morphine, to POD 3 following surgery when receiving routine multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine and multimodal pain management with addition of ESP catheters versus multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine alone.

Hypothesis 2: Patients undergoing hepatic resection will have decreased incidence of persistent postoperative pain - based on mean opioid consumption and standard of care numeric rating scale pain scores during their hospital stay and at home- when receiving routine multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine with addition ESP catheters versus multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine alone.

This will be randomized, subject-masked, placebo-controlled, human subjects clinical trial.

Enrollment. Consenting adults undergoing hepatic resection will be offered enrollment. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status.

This will be a single-center (UCSD), randomized, controlled investigation.

Preoperative Procedures. Following written, informed consent, we will record baseline anthropomorphic information (age, sex, height, and weight) that is already provided by all patients having surgery. After consenting and prior to surgery, patients will be randomized (utilizing sealed envelopes with 1:1 ratio) to either intrathecal morphine and sham ESP catheters or intrathecal morphine and active ESP catheters. Currently the decision to place ESP catheters is at the discretion of the attending physician. The only difference for subjects participating in the study (vs those not participating) will be that the placement of ESP catheters and decision to activate them-currently standard-of-care and used daily at UCSD because of clinical equipoise-will be determined randomly, instead of the physician simply choosing him/herself.

Intrathecal morphine and sham ESP catheter group: In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area of insertion will be cleaned with iodine povacrylex and isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep Surgical Prepping Solution, 3M St. Paul, MN USA), and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. After identifying with palpation the desired interspace using sterile techniques with the midline single shot spinal approach a 25g pencil point needle spinal needle is passed through an introducer needle. After free flow of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) is established 300mcg of intrathecal morphine is slowly injected with additional aspiration of CSF at the midpoint and end of injection to confirm continued subarachnoid administration. Then bilateral T7-8 ESP catheters will be taped onto the patient's back after administration of local anesthetic at the site. The 0.2% ropivacaine infusions will be started at the ESP block catheter immediately after catheter insertion with a total rate of 0.1ml per hour.

Intrathecal morphine and ESP catheter group: Catheter insertion will adhere to current UCSD standard-of-care. In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area of insertion will be cleaned with iodine povacrylex and isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep Surgical Prepping Solution, 3M St. Paul, MN USA), and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. After identifying with palpation the desired interspace using sterile techniques with the midline single shot spinal approach a 25g pencil point needle spinal needle is passed through an introducer needle. After free flow of CSF is established 300mcg (200mcg for age >65yrs or respiratory concerns) of intrathecal morphine is slowly injected with additional aspiration of CSF at the midpoint and end of injection to confirm continued subarachnoid administration. Then bilateral T7-8 ESP catheters will be placed under ultrasound guidance. A catheter will be placed with saline with 1:200,000 of epinephrine. To confirm catheter location 15 mls of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be injected and the block sensory level will be confirmed with ice. A total of 30mls of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be used for bilateral catheter placement (15mls per side). A Ropivacaine 0.2% infusions will be started at the ESP block catheter immediately after catheter insertion with a total rate of 12mls per hour, 2mls/hr continuous infusion and 10ml set bolus every 120mins.

Additional Postoperative Pain Interventions: Intraoperatively the patient will have general anesthesia. Postoperatively, both groups will be started on the same multimodal oral regimen and followed by the Acute Pain Service (APS) as per APS standard of care.

Current Standard Care: Currently, all patients undergoing hepatic resection receive preoperative intrathecal morphine and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist the patient may or may not receive ESP catheters as well as multimodal pain regimen managed by APS. Intraoperatively general anesthesia. The only difference for subjects participating in the study (vs those not participating) will be that they will be randomized to whether or not they get ESP catheters. We will ensure that there are no patient contraindications to either intervention.

Data collection: All data collection will be through standard UCSD nursing/therapy EPIC notes and patient interviews in-person during hospitalization or via telephone call.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing hepatic resection
  • Admitting service requests APS consult
  • >18 years old and able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • incarceration
  • inability to communicate with the investigators and hospital staff
  • severe hepatic disease
  • chronic high-dose opioid use (defined as daily use for more than 4 weeks prior to surgery of at least the equivalent of 20 mg oxycodone);
  • BMI > 40 kg/m2
  • allergy to study medications (lidocaine, ropivacaine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Active Treatment
This group will receive a continuous erector spinae block catheter followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 10ml automatic set bolus per 120 minutes with 2ml/hr continuous infusion (14mls total every 2 hours per catheter)
Treatment- continuous erector spinae block catheter followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 10ml automatic set bolus per 60 minute with 2ml/hr continuous infusion (12mls/hr total per catheter)
Other Names:
  • Treatment
200-300 mcg of spinal morphine
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
This group will receive a superficially placed (taped to the surface) erector spinae block catheter with a ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 0.1ml /hr
200-300 mcg of spinal morphine
Placebo- Superficially placed (taped to the surface) erector spinae block catheter with a ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 0.1ml /hr
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total opioid requirement postoperative day (POD) 1-3
Time Frame: Total use from post-operative day (POD) 1, as defined by 24 hours after intrathecal morphine, to POD 3 (3 days from admission to recovery unit)
Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Total use from post-operative day (POD) 1, as defined by 24 hours after intrathecal morphine, to POD 3 (3 days from admission to recovery unit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total opioid requirement postoperative day (POD) 0-4
Time Frame: Total use from hospital admission to POD 4 (4 days after admission to recovery unit)
Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Total use from hospital admission to POD 4 (4 days after admission to recovery unit)
Pain Score at rest and with cough
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 30
Average pain score on the 10-point numeric rating scale (0 being no pain, 10 worst pain)
Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 30
Discharge opioids and refills.
Time Frame: Typically within 14days of admission, then at 14 days, and at 30 days.
Amount of opioids prescribed at discharge and amount taken/refills while at home
Typically within 14days of admission, then at 14 days, and at 30 days.
Nausea
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Defined by number of antiemetics administered
Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Time to ambulation
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Able to get out of bed with physical therapy
Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Time to oral intake
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Diet advancement
Post-Operative Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
Hospital Length Of Stay
Time Frame: Total number of days requiring hospitalization for surgical procedure. Up to 1 month.
From admission to hospital for surgery to discharge
Total number of days requiring hospitalization for surgical procedure. Up to 1 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Engy T Said, MD, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on 0.2% ropivacaine local anesthetic continuous erector spinae plane block

3
Subscribe