Reduction Or Elimination Of Radiation During Implantation of Cardiac Devices Using Ultrasound (RADICAL USE)

February 19, 2024 updated by: Habib Khan

Reduction Or Elimination Of Radiation During Implantation of Cardiac Devices Using Ultrasound (RADICAl USe)

Specialized equipment is required to put pacemakers in the heart. This requires use of radiation to see the wires or leads being implanted in the heart. Repeated radiation use can result in permanent injury to the patient and to the doctor. The investigators aim to investigate if they can use ultrasound to guide and help in the implantation of leads into the heart. Ultrasound is a safe method and requires only a small handheld probe and a small screen to see different structures in the heart. If ultrasounds proves successful as a tool to reduce radiation then this would be very useful technical breakthrough. It would help develop smaller centres where pacemakers can be implanted without purchasing xray equipment and expensive setups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Radiation quantity used in medicine is expanding year on year with increasing clinical uses for medical illnesses and to visualize instruments being used during procedures such as cardiac devices including pacemakers. The effects of radiation are not only on the patients for their procedure but also a cumulative effect of radiation on the operators. The stochastic effects of radiation have been well reported in the literature. Advancing technologies such as 3-dimensional(3D) mapping systems have allowed for leads to be identified using a 3D matrix and safely deployed to the myocardium. However, there are significant costs associated with the use of 3D mapping systems resulting in this approach not being widely adopted. Ultrasound use during implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has been utilized in the past to gain vascular access via the axillary vein with good safety results. Experimental studies to visualize leads in the heart and venous systems using 3D ultrasound showed optimism but has not translated to clinical use due to lack of technology to improve the spatial and temporal resolution. The technology in imaging resolution has improved over the last 5 years and likely can be used to visualize a pacing lead in the heart. Techniques such as intravascular cardiac ultrasound have been used to assist in implanting lead via coronary sinus in individuals who can have contrast allergies. Therefore, transthoracic echocardiogram and ultrasound should be now of sufficient quality to allow for successful pacemaker insertion.

To date, there has not been a feasibility study to evaluate complete ultrasound and echocardiography-assisted pacemaker insertion.

In this study, the investigators aim to utilize ultrasound and echocardiography to gain vascular access and to direct the pacing lead into the right ventricle to allow for safe pacemaker implantation. If this is successful, then this will allow for a larger study to be conducted for single chamber devices including implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Moreover, the investigators will be able to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this new technique compared to the conventional technique of pacemaker implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • Recruiting
        • London Health Sciences Centre Res. Inc. (Ont.)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >18 years old.
  2. Suitable to have either a single chamber pacemaker or single chamber cardioverter-defibrillator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. BMI >30.
  2. Pregnancy.
  3. Implantation of dual-chamber and CRT devices.
  4. Claustrophobia.
  5. Tender chest wall or history of trauma to the chest wall.
  6. Higher signal interference using ultrasound due to the presence of other medical devices or tools used in previous surgical procedures such as sternal wires, mechanical valves, breast implants.
  7. History of radiation to the chest wall for oncology treatments.
  8. Active malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduced fluoroscopy arm
Patients exposed to 20 seconds or less of fluoroscopy to implant a single chamber device with aid of ultrasound / echocardiography.
Ultrasound will be used to guide vascular access and to place a lead into the right ventricle.
Other Names:
  • Echocardiography by using St Jude - Zonaire ultrasound and P4-1c transducer.
Active Comparator: Conventional arm
Patients exposed to more than 20 seconds of fluoroscopy to implant a single chamber device with/without the aid of ultrasound / echocardiography.
Ultrasound will be used to guide vascular access and to place a lead into the right ventricle.
Other Names:
  • Echocardiography by using St Jude - Zonaire ultrasound and P4-1c transducer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of implanting a single chamber lead with use of ultrasound
Time Frame: 0 day
Binary outcome - successful or not.
0 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of radiation will be measured in seconds
Time Frame: during procedure
Comparison between the treatment and control group
during procedure
Total radiation dose will be collected in centiGray and milliGray units.
Time Frame: during procedure
Comparison between the treatment and control group
during procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10510

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bradycardia

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound / Echocardiography

Subscribe