Accelerating Lung Cancer Diagnosis Through Liquid Biopsy (ACCELERATE)

December 11, 2025 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto
This study will assess the utility of liquid biopsy to accelerate the time to treatment for patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer, compared to the conventional diagnostic pathway of molecular testing of tumour tissue after imaging and biopsy.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toronto, Canada
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred to the UHN Lung Cancer Rapid Assessment & Management Program (Lung RAMP) with radiologic evidence of advanced (unresectable stage III or IV) non-small cell lung cancer.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Lung RAMP Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference or study team confirms radiologic (clinical) evidence of advanced, unresectable lung cancer;
  2. Measurable disease (presumed malignant) by RECIST 1.1;
  3. Age ≥18 years;
  4. Ability to provide written informed consent;
  5. Diagnostic biopsy and molecular profiling ordered or planned. Patients remain eligible even if biopsy or tumour testing later fails or is deemed not feasible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Concurrent active malignancy except for localized non-melanomatous skin cancer or non-invasive cervical cancer. Any previous cancer (excluding NSCLC) must have been treated more than 2 years prior to study entry with no current evidence of active disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Advanced NSCLC
Patients with radiologic evidence of advanced (unresectable stage III or IV) non-small cell lung cancer
All patients will have a liquid biopsy with ctDNA molecular profiling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to treatment
Time Frame: Up to 18 Months
The time to treatment decision (TLB) in the study cohort by liquid (TL) and tissue biopsy (TB) is measured from the date of referral to the earliest date of receiving a liquid or tissue biopsy report indicating actionable genomic aberrations, or TLB = min (TL, TB). The time to treatment decision using tissue biopsy alone (TB) will be collected in a chart-review comparison cohort (patients referred in the previous 12 months that meet the eligibility criteria). The time to treatment decision by liquid biopsy (TLB) vs by tissue biopsy alone (TB) will be compared.
Up to 18 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to treatment - non-smoker subgroup
Time Frame: Up to 18 Months
Measure the time to treatment, using the same parameters as the primary outcome measure, in a subgroup of patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC with a smoking history of ≤15 pack years.
Up to 18 Months
Turnaround time
Time Frame: Up to 18 Months
Calculate the time (in days) from the date of request for testing to the report date for both liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy.
Up to 18 Months
Concordance between liquid and tissue
Time Frame: Up to 18 Months
Count the number of actionable targets identified by liquid biopsy and by tissue biopsy, by patient, that were in agreement.
Up to 18 Months
Costs of upfront use of liquid biopsy vs standard tissue profiling
Time Frame: Up to 24 Months
A cost-effectiveness model will be developed comparing the initial use of liquid biopsy versus the current standard of tissue biopsy and profiling.
Up to 24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Liquid Biopsy

Subscribe