Child Follow-up in Women Treated With Conventional IVF or ICSI

July 26, 2022 updated by: Mỹ Đức Hospital

Developmental Outcomes of Children Born Through Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Versus Conventional in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in Couples With Non-male Factor Infertility

To compare the physical, mental and motor development of babies born from pregnancy using ICSI technique and and conventional IVF in non-male factor infertile couples. Based on our previous RCT (NCT03428919), the non-male factor couples were randomly assigned to IVF or ICSI, which leads to the similarity in characteristics of these two groups. Hence, the result of analyzing these offsprings would be preciously valuable.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over the past two decades, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) indications have been extended and routinely applied to all cases of assisted reproductive techniques: unexplained infertility, poor-quality oocytes, low oocyte yeild, advanced marternal age, prior failed fertilization with conventional insemination, after in-vitro maturation of oocytes and for cases of cryopreserved oocytes (Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2020). In 2004, fertilization using ICSI accounted for nearly 60% of all aspirations globally. In the Middle East, the number of ICSI cycles increased rapidly from 2000 (47.6%) to 2007 (65.2%), and reached 97.8% in the Middle East in 2007 (Ishihara et al, 2015). Another survey recorded in Europe in 2011, out of a total of 437,510 cycles of fresh embryo transfer, 68% of cycles were performed using ICSI techniques. In male infertility cases, the rate of implementation of ICSI increased from 76.3% to 93.3%. In particular, in cases of non-male-factor infertility, the incidence of ICSI also increased from 15.4% to 66.9%. From 2008-2012, of 494 907 treatment cycles, 74.6% used ICSI. In which, ICSI accounts for 92.9% of the cycle of male infertility and 64.5% of the cycle of non-male-factor infertility (Boulet, 2015).

However, ICSI is an invasive technique that bypasses the natural barriers of fertilization. This has led to concern about an increase in the incidence of anomalies in ICSI-born babies as this technique is increasingly being used in all cases of contraception. In contrast, there are studies that have also compared IVF with ICSI and show that in the ICSI cycle, the incidence of multiple pregnancies and low birth weight infants is lower than that of IVF, although there is no difference in infant survival between the two groups (Boulet et al, 2015).

In addition to the short-term outcomes, the investigators also have to consider the long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. There is still not much evidence comparing the effects of the above methods, if any, on the psychomotor development in children.

Therefore, the investigators decide to conduct a study to compare the physical, mental and motor development of babies born from pregnancy using ICSI technique and and conventional IVF in non-male factor infertile couples.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

322

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tan Binh
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam
        • Mỹ Đức Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Live babies born through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) in couples with non-male factor infertility (NCT03428919)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Live babies born from ICSI Versus Conventional IVF in Non-male Factor Couples (NCT03428919)
  • Parents agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Babies died after the perinatal period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ICSI technique
In ICSI group, insemination will be performed by using ICSI, 3 - 4 hours after oocyte retrieval. OCCs will be stripped by using hyaluronidase. Only matured oocytes will be inseminated.
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Conventional IVF
In conventional IVF group, insemination will be performed by conventional IVF. Two hours after retrieval, collected OCCs will be inseminated for another 2 hours, at a concentration of 100,000 motile sperm/ml. Inseminated OCCs will be cultured overnight in culture medium.
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires
Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy to use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients having abnormal ASQ-3 scores in each aspect
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth

ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionaires®) has 5 aspects: Communication, Gross motor, Fine motor, Problem solving and Personal-Social Each aspect has 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0.

Abnormal ASQ-3 score in an aspect = ASQ-3 score of 2 standard deviations below the mean of the aspect.

Up to 66 months after birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of breast-feeding
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after birth
Duration of breast-feeding
Up to 24 months after birth
Infant age at which weaning starts
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after birth
Infant age at which weaning starts
Up to 24 months after birth
Score of Communication
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold
Up to 66 months after birth
Name of diseases that lead to hospital admission
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
Name of diseases that lead to hospital admission
Up to 66 months after birth
Weight
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
Weight on the examination date
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
Height
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
Height on the examination date
Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
Score of Gross motor
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold
Up to 66 months after birth
Score of Fine motor
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold
Up to 66 months after birth
Score of Problem solving
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold
Up to 66 months after birth
Score of Personal-Social
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold
Up to 66 months after birth
The rate of children who have at least one red flag sign
Time Frame: From 2 to 5.5 years after birth

He or she has at least one red flag sign by age:

From 12 to < 18 month-old:

  • Doesn't crawl
  • Can't stand when supported
  • Doesn't search for things that he/she sees the participants hide
  • Doesn't say single words ("baba", "mama"...)
  • Doesn't learn gestures like waving or shaking head
  • Doesn't point to things
  • Loses skills he/she once had

From 18 to < 24 month-old:

  • Doesn't point to show things to others
  • Can't walk
  • Doesn't know what familiar things are for
  • Doesn't gain new words
  • Doesn't have at least 6 words
  • Doesn't notice or mind when a caregiver leaves or returns
  • Lose skills he once had

From 24 to < 36 month-old:

  • Doesn't use 2-word phrases
  • Doesn't know what to do with common things, like a brush, spoon
  • Doesn't copy actions and words
  • Doesn't follow simple instructions
  • Doesn't walk steadily
  • Loses skills he/she once had
From 2 to 5.5 years after birth

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of long-term illness and chronic conditions
Time Frame: Up to 66 months after birth
The rate of long-term illness and chronic conditions
Up to 66 months after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nghia A Nguyen, MD, PhD, Mỹ Đức Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 04/2021/MĐ-HĐĐĐ

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conventional IVF, ICSI

Clinical Trials on Physical development and General Health

Subscribe