Patient Perceptions Around Quality of Care Through Telemedicine in Neuro-Oncology

March 14, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
This study evaluates patient perceptions around quality of care through telemedicine in neuro-oncology. Studying questionnaires related to perceptions quality of care through telemedicine in patients with brain cancer may help doctors to improve the delivery of care through this modality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate the patient-perceived quality of care by group (telemedicine versus in-person visits) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To characterize the visits provided by telemedicine compared to those in-person.

II. To contrast the average time spent on telemedicine visits compared to in-person visits, and the delay between visit order placement and visit occurring.

III. To evaluate the domains of patient care addressed on a telemedicine visit versus in-person visit per documentation, including (1) treatment planning, (2) symptom burden, (3) goals of care.

IV. To evaluate frequency of acute care sought (through emergency room or urgent care clinic) within 30 days of encounter in telemedicine visit versus (vs) in-person visit.

V. The impact of patient and clinical characteristics on perceived quality of care in the context of covariate-adjusted modeling.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete a survey related to their perceived quality of care via telephone and have their medical chart reviewed prospectively.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Barbara J O'Brien, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with encounters at the Brain and Spine Center between 4/20/2020 and either (1) 8/30/2020 or (2) date that the state of emergency secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic is declared terminated in the United States of America- whichever date is earlier

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a CNS tumors: this includes patients with primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and leptomeningeal disease
  • Established patients with a follow up encounter with Neuro-Oncology at the Brain and Spine Center at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; this encounter can be

    • An in-person visit
    • A telemedicine appointment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Encounter occurred with the assistance of official language translation support
  • Patients with telephone encounters (without interactive video)
  • New patient or consult visits
  • Neither patient nor caregiver present during the visit are available or able to answer survey questions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (survey, medical chart review)
Patients complete a survey related to their perceived quality of care via telephone and have their medical chart reviewed prospectively.
Complete survey
Review of medical chart

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survey response to question 6 of the quality of care survey ("I felt I received good medical care during this encounter")
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Survey responses will be summarized by ordinal category as counts with percentages, separately by group. Will separately estimate the proportion of each ordinal level of each group with 95% confidence interval.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Care Survey
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will separately estimate the proportion of each ordinal level of each group with 95% confidence interval.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients and clinical characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline
Differences between groups will be assessed by 2-sample 2-sided t-test and Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, or chi-square test.
Baseline
Interactive time spent during visit
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be summarized by group per mean, median, standard deviation, and range. Differences between groups will be assessed by t-test and Mann-Whitney test.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time from visit order placement to visit occurring
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be summarized by group per mean, median, standard deviation, and range. Differences between groups will be assessed by t-test and Mann-Whitney test.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Domains of patient care addressed during a visit, including treatment planning, symptom burden, and goals of care
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be summarized as counts with percentages by group. Differences between groups will be assessed by chi-square test.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Incidence of acute care sought (through emergency room or urgent care clinic)
Time Frame: Within 30 days of encounter
Will be summarized as counts with percentages by group. Differences between groups will be provisionally assessed by Fisher's exact test.
Within 30 days of encounter

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barbara J O'Brien, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0493 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2020-07493 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Brain

Clinical Trials on Survey Administration

3
Subscribe