GPS Project Evaluation of the Impact of the Reorganization of Work Into a Family Medicine Group on Pharmacotherapy and Support for the Autonomy of Seniors With Major Neurocognitive Disorders

August 20, 2024 updated by: Dre Edeltraut Kröger, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

GPS Project - Evaluation of the Impact of the Reorganization of Work Into a Family Medicine Group on Pharmacotherapy and Support for the Autonomy of Seniors With Major Neurocognitive Disorders

The model of care tested in the GPS project aims to optimize pharmacotherapy for seniors undergoing cognitive assessment or suffering from major neurocognitive disorder (MCND) at home. The goal is to reduce polymedication, inappropriate medications and the treatment burden of seniors and to maintain their cognitive health, quality of life and autonomy. The intervention will include knowledge exchange sessions with nurses, pharmacists, and doctors in FMGs, and increased collaboration between these professionals and home care services teams. Other goal is to increase the satisfaction of the seniors, their families, and the professionals involved in the GPS project.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

: The GPS project is part of the desire to keep seniors with major neurocognitive disorder (MCND) in their homes for as long as possible. Medication can contribute to cognitive loss in seniors and affect their functional autonomy. The arrival of pharmacists in FMGs and the expansion of their practice is opening up new opportunities to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and optimize pharmacotherapy for seniors. During the project, a new model of care, called GPS, is being tested with seniors. A group of seniors (approximately 200) will receive the new care team's new interventions in the FMGs in the "intervention" group. Another group of seniors (about 200) will receive the usual care in other FMGs that will serve as a "control" group. By comparing the results of the two groups, it will be possible to evaluate the effects of new interventions. A period of 12 months will be allocated for the inclusion of seniors. The follow-up of each senior will be approximately 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3M 2X6
        • Recruiting
        • GMF Bordeaux-Cartierville
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Georges, Quebec, Canada, G5Y 5L6
        • Recruiting
        • GMF Abénakis
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Edeltraut Kröger, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All seniors (65 years of age or older) undergoing cognitive evaluation OR referred to a memory clinic OR having been diagnosed with cognitive impairment within the last year OR with MCND and followed up at home AND,
  • referred to the pharmacist, for the FMGs exposed
  • taking prescription medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Seniors in palliative care OR
  • unable to answer questionnaires in French AND without a caregiver.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exposed FMGs to GPS intervention
Patients who are followed by FMGs exposed to the GPS intervention. They will receive the GPS intervention.
Nurses and doctors in exposed FMGs and home care teams (HCTs) will be asked to refer to the FMG pharmacist all seniors undergoing cognitive evaluation OR referred to a memory clinic OR recently diagnosed with a cognitive disorder, for a complete and critical review of their medication therapy. FMG pharmacists will be asked to conduct an interview with each referred senior and his or her caregiver, if applicable, in order to establish the best possible treatment regimen. They will compare the information collected with another reliable data source (e.g., pharmacy records) in order to perform medication reconciliation and will then evaluate the medication related problems. Pharmacist will establish a care plan and the follow-ups to be carried out with the patient in collaboration with the health care team. There will be no drug or devices tested, it is a human clinical intervention by a pharmacist.
No Intervention: Non exposed FMGs to GPS intervention
Patients who are part of the FMGs not exposed to the GPS intervention. They will receive the usual care and services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in number of prescribed medications
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months after inclusion in the study.
The total number of prescribed medications and 2) the number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) according to the Beers criteria or according to the OptimaMed criteria for participants with advanced MCND will be measured in both groups, before, during and after the study.
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months after inclusion in the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in treatment burden
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months follow-up
The treatment burden level will be measured with the 13-item Multimorbidity Treatment burden questionnaire in the intervention and control groups before and after the study. Each item will be scored as follows: zero (not difficult/ does not apply), one (a little difficult), two (quite difficult), three (very difficult), four (extremely difficult).Scores will be interpreted as suggested by the authors of the original MTBQ instrument: no burden (score 0), low burden (score <10), medium burden (10-22), high burden (>=22)
Baseline and 6 months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in number of hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards
The number of hospitalizations in the 12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards will be evaluated by the exploration of the RAMQ data record with the consent of the participant in the intervention and control groups
12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards
Change in number of emergency room visits
Time Frame: 12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards
The number of emergency room visits in the 12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards will be evaluated by the exploration of the RAMQ data record with the consent of the participant in the intervention and control groups.
12 months prior to the start of the intervention and in the 12 months afterwards
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months follow-up
The measure of quality of live will be perform two times with the EQ-5D-5L in the intervention and control groups before and after the study. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. For instance, 'slight problems' is always coded as '2'. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit code that describes the respondent's health state. For example, 21111 means slight problems in the mobility dimension and no problems in any of the other dimensions.
Baseline and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Line Guénette, Ph.D, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Laval University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Neurocognitive Disorder

Clinical Trials on GPS clinical intervention

Subscribe