Shared Decision-making on Medical Tests and Care Cascades

November 15, 2022 updated by: Ishani Ganguli MD, MPH, Brigham and Women's Hospital

A Multi-pronged Intervention to Initiate Shared Decision-making on Medical Tests and Care Cascades in the Primary Care Setting

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of patient and provider facing educational materials and peer comparison on medical testing conversations during annual physicals. The investigators hypothesize that education materials and peer comparison will improve conversation quality about medical testing decisions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medical tests may show unexpected findings leading to additional tests, treatments, and visits that cost money and take time but may not have benefits. This is a prevalent issue with major consequences for patients and clinicians. Making informed decisions about when to order medical tests may help avoid unnecessary costs and worry. However, doctors don't always have detailed conversations about medical testing and there are patient gaps in knowledge. The investigators hypothesize that education materials and peer comparison to promote conversations about medical tests will improve conversation quality about medical testing decisions. The investigators have developed patient and provider-facing interventions to educate on and promote conversations about the uses and consequences of medical tests, and the investigators will test the impact of this just-in-time educational and peer comparison intervention on the likelihood of patients having productive conversations about medical tests. The effects of the intervention will be assessed using surveys before and after the study. This work has the potential to help patients feel more supported by their healthcare system, empower patients to participate in shared decision-making, and build trust between patients and clinicians.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

329

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02120
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria (Physicians):

  • Primary care physicians at Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • In active practice

Inclusion criteria (Patients):

  • Adults age 18 years old or older
  • English-speaking
  • Access to email
  • Did not opt out of receiving research invitations from health system
  • Patients of participating physicians
  • Scheduled annual physical during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Intervention arm physicians will receive an email with feedback on how they compare to their peers in aggregate on test ordering during annual physicals, along with physician-facing education materials. This email will be sent before each patient study visit for all patients in the study. Participating patients of intervention arm physicians will receive patient education materials one to two days before their study visit.
Patients receive a text-message and email with educational materials about medical testing.
Physicians receive an email with feedback on how they compare to their peers in aggregate on test ordering during annual physicals.
Physicians receive reference materials on medical test interpretation and incidental findings.
Placebo Comparator: Control Arm
Control arm physicians receive an email with information on the general visit preparation tips that their patients will receive. Participating patients of control arm physicians will receive general visit preparation tips one to two days before their study visit.
Patients receive a text-message and email with general visit preparation tips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shared Decision-Making Process 4 Survey
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Composite score of survey items completed by the patient after physician visit. Min 0, Max 4 (higher is better).
Within two weeks after visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of testing discussion
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Binary measure from patient post-visit survey (present vs absent)
Within two weeks after visit
Satisfaction with testing discussion
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Binary measure from patient post-visit survey (high vs low)
Within two weeks after visit
Discussion of next steps
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Binary measure from patient post-visit survey (present vs absent)
Within two weeks after visit
Whether doctor explained tests in a way that was easy to understand
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Binary measure from patient post-visit survey (yes completely vs yes a little or no)
Within two weeks after visit
Patient knowledge
Time Frame: Within two weeks after visit
Composite score of survey items from patient post-visit survey. Min 0, Max 4 (higher is better).
Within two weeks after visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ishani Ganguli, MD, MPH, Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Robert S Rudin, PhD, RAND

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020P001080

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Clinical Trials on Patient education materials

Subscribe