MRI-based Approaches for Multi-parametric Model to Early Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer (NeoMDSS)

August 3, 2024 updated by: Kun Wang, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

MRI-based Approaches for Multi-parametric Model to Early Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer (NeoMDSS)

The purpose of this clinical research is to evaluate the accuracy of a multi-parametric model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after the first cycle of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) given to patients with locally advanced breast cancer, thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pCR or save patients from toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide. NAT has been well established in managing breast cancer for patients with locally advanced cancer and early-stage operable breast cancers of specific molecular subtypes. Though pCR has been demonstrated to be associated with better survival, it can only be judged by pathological testing of surgically resected specimens. Thus, predicting pCR earlier during NAT is imperative and can timely switch to a new personalized treatment strategy and exempt from unnecessary chemotherapy toxicity for patients.

This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 301 patients undergoing MRI after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This project plans to establish and validate a model for determining pCR during NAT in breast cancer based on clinical information, imaging and pathological information of patients in multiple centers, in order to provide important references for further early diagnosis and personalized treatment.

  1. Collecting MRI images data, clinical and pathological information, treatment regimens, and curative effect information to build an MRI-based, multi-parametric model.
  2. Evaluating the performance of model through internal and external validation cohort by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), discrimination and calibration measures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

301

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Guangdong Provincial People'S Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Selection of patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Description

  1. For training cohort:

    Inclusion Criteria:

    • Age ≥18 years;
    • Histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma;
    • Clinical stage II-III at presentation;
    • Complete basic information and image data;
    • Have MRI imaging data at baseline and after the first cycle of NAC;
    • Finish the standard NAC treatment and undergo surgery;

    Exclusion Criteria:

    • With chemotherapy contraindications;
    • Multifocal of multicentric lesions;
    • Poor quality of MRI images;
  2. For validation cohort:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Complete basic information and image data;
  • Clinical stage II-III at presentation;
  • Scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
  • Signed informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With chemotherapy contraindications;
  • Metastatic breast cancer;
  • Multifocal of multicentric lesions;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
the training cohort
From January 2019 to December 2020, 140 patients from Guangdong Province People's Hospital with complete clinicopathological information and available images of MRI before treatment and after 1st-NAT were retrospectively recruited for the training cohort
the internal validation cohort
From June 2021 and December 2023, 120 patients from Guangdong Province People's Hospital were prospectively recruited for the internal validation cohort.
the external validation cohort
From June 2021 and December 2023, 41 patients from Shantou Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University and The First People's Hospital of Foshan were prospectively recruited for the external validation cohort.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: up to 28 weeks
Testing the sensitivity of NeoMDSS model to predict pCR using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
up to 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity
Time Frame: up to 28 weeks
Testing the sensitivity of NeoMDSS model to predict non-pCR using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
up to 28 weeks
Specificity
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
Testing the difference in the tumor shrinkage patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in triple-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy , as well as the correlation between tumor regression pattern and efficacy.
up to 6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shrinkage pattern
Time Frame: up to 28 weeks
The difference in tumor regression shrinkage patterns between the different treatment groups. Based on the MRI after the first cycle, the tumor SPs were grouped into three categories: CS, diffuse decrease, and no change or enlargement.
up to 28 weeks
correlation between shrinkage patterns and efficacy
Time Frame: up to 28 weeks
The correlation between tumor regression shrinkage patterns and treatment efficacy.
up to 28 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe