SYSTEMATIC SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT IN CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS (IRMA)

June 9, 2021 updated by: Roila Fausto, University Of Perugia

(ImmunotheRapy SyMptom CApture) A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SYSTEMATIC SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT IN CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be different in their onset, kinetics and presentation but unlike chemotherapy are seldom predictable. Toxicity can affect nearly any organ system and multiple presentations of rare but severe irAEs have been reported, highlighting the relevance of vigilant monitoring.

Although early detection and timely management of high grade or special interest irAEs (such as cardiac and neurological) is obvious, it is unclear whether early identification of less serious events can lead to clinical benefit. Furthermore, it is of the utmost importance to develop new tools which can increase identification of side effects. The current study investigates systematic symptom assessment through an electronic patient reported outcome tool and aims to define whether this can reduce the rate of serious irAEs.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Systematic collection of symptom information during immunotherapy treatment will be compared to usual care in locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer (NSCLC or SCLC) and surgically resected or advanced melanoma. Electronic survey will be administered every other day to report 14 common symptoms selected from the NCI-PRO-CTCAE TM library developed by the NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, Bethesda, Maryland) Italian version (NCI-PRO-CTCAETM ITEMS-ITALIAN-Item Library Version 1.0).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old at time of signing Informed Consent Form
  • Histologically documented diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer (NSCLC or SCLC), surgically resected or advanced melanoma
  • Patients eligible for immunotherapy in any line of treatment, either alone or in combination with other immunotherapy drugs or with chemotherapy
  • Signed Informed Consent Form
  • Life expectancy ≥3 months
  • ECOG Performance Status of ≤2
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function, defined by laboratory test result by investigator's judgment
  • Viral hepatitis screening:

    1. Negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test
    2. For patients with positive total HBcAb test, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA test is required
    3. For patients with positive HCV antibody test, hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA test is required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving immunotherapy at time of enrollment
  • > 1 grade adverse events from previous treatments
  • Any uncontrolled symptom
  • Clinically unstable brain metastases (i.e., symptomatic, not treated with RT and rapidly evolving)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ARM A
Self-Reporting by electronic survey consisting of 14 items selected by the NCI-PRO-CTCAE TM ITEMS-ITALIAN (Item Library Version 1.0)
  • Systematic symptom assessment
  • Conventional symptom assessment
Other: Arm B
Standard symptom reporting following the conventional modalities of clinical oncology practice
  • Systematic symptom assessment
  • Conventional symptom assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Decrease rate of irAEs ≥ grade 3 according to CTCAEs (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) with systematic symptom assessment
Time Frame: 36 months
The electronic questionnaire surveys 14 symptoms selected by the NCI-PRO-CTCAE TM ITEMS-ITALIAN (Item Library Version 1.0). The patient will rate their symptoms on a 5-point ordinal scale concerning the symptom frequency (never / rarely / sometimes / often / almost always), intensity (not at all / a little / quite / a lot / very much) and sometimes their interference with usual/daily activities (not at all / a little / quite / a lot / very much). The questionnaire must be collected from all patients (ARM A and ARM B) after randomization and before first treatment administration. Patients enrolled in ARM A must answer the questionnaire every other day. Alert will then be triggered when symptom level is not within the designated range. Following every activated alert, a physical examination and biochemical blood tests must be carried out.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Duration of irAEs ≥ grade 3
Time Frame: 36 months
Duration of irAEs ≥ grade 3
36 months
2. Emergency hospital admission
Time Frame: 36 months
Emergency hospital admission
36 months
3. Admission to and duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: 36 months
Admission to and duration of hospitalization
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 20, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanoma

Clinical Trials on Systematic symptom assessment

Subscribe