- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04946032
Optimum Length of Catheter in the Epidural Space for Labor Analgesia in Non-obese Women: a Randomised Controlled Trial of 4 cm Versus 5 cm
Epidural analgesia was introduced to the world of obstetrics in 1909 by Walter Stoeckel. Over the following 100 years it has developed to become the gold-standard for delivery of intra-partum analgesia, with between 60 and 75% of North American parturients receiving an epidural during their labor. Effective labor analgesia has been shown to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. One aspect of catheter insertion that has not been fully evaluated, and with very little recent work undertaken, is the optimal length of epidural catheter to be left in the epidural space. Dislodgement or displacement of epidural catheter remains a significant cause for failure with analgesia. Novel methods of fixation may further reduce the risk of catheter migration. Another factor is the direction of travel within the epidural space, only 13% of lumbar catheters remain uncoiled after insertion of more than 4 cm into the epidural space.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that catheters inserted to 4 cm will have a lower rate of failure when compared to those inserted to 5 cm.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the difference in quality of labor analgesia delivered by epidural catheters inserted to either 4 or 5 cm into the epidural space.
This study will be conducted as an interventional double-blinded randomised control trial to establish best practice.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Effective labor analgesia has been shown to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. It is of paramount importance to the obstetric anesthesiologist to optimize the quality of labor analgesia and identify any factors leading to ineffective epidural analgesia. One aspect of catheter insertion that has not been fully evaluated, and with very little recent work undertaken, is the optimal length of epidural catheter to be left in the epidural space.
Previous studies have advocated, for varying reasons, different lengths of catheter to be left in the space; these range from 2cm to 8cm. Longer epidural lengths in the space can be associated with foraminal escape, leading to unilateral block, and intravascular insertion, prompting additional manipulation. Shorter lengths have previously been associated with more frequent dislodgement. The directionality of the epidural catheter once in the space has been demonstrated to correlate with misdirection.
The aim of the study would be to standardize practice in how much epidural catheter is threaded into the epidural space.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G1X5
- Mount Sinai Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All women aged 18 years and above.
- In established second stage of labor.
- 3-7 cm dilation at time of insertion.
- Women with BMI < 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known contraindication to epidural insertion.
- Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent.
- Previous difficult epidural insertion.
- Previous failed epidural.
- Imminent instrumental or operative delivery.
- Dural puncture.
- Combined spinal epidural analgesia.
- High BMI > 40 kg/m2
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 4 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 4 cm.
|
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 5 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 5 cm.
|
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensory block level < T10
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Sensory block level to ice will be measured 1 hour after the loading dose is administered. Yes: inadequate block No: adequate block |
1 hour
|
|
Block height discrepancy
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Unilateral block or block height discrepancy of >3 dermatomal levels at any time prior to delivery. Yes: inadequate block No: adequate block |
24 hours
|
|
Re-siting of the epidural
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Re-siting of the epidural at any time during labour will indicate an inadequate block, for any of the following reasons:
|
24 hours
|
|
Adjustment of catheter length
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Adjustment of catheter length at any time during labour would also indicate an inadequate block.
|
24 hours
|
|
Abandonment of epidural or substitute for alternative method of analgesia after initial failure: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The epidural analgesia will also be considered inadequate if the procedure is abandoned or another method of analgesia is used.
This will be recorded by the anesthesiologist.
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain score >3 at any time during labour: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) greater than 3, where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever.
|
24 hours
|
|
Number of epidural top-ups administered by the nursing team
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The number of times the labour and delivery nurse has to administer a top-up of the epidural.
|
24 hours
|
|
Number of epidural top-ups administered by the anesthesiologist
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The number of times the anesthesiologist has to administer a top-up of the epidural.
|
24 hours
|
|
Pain scores recorded throughout labour: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS), where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever.
A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) greater than 3, where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever.
|
24 hours
|
|
Hourly sensory block height assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Hourly sensory block height assessment, using sensation to ice.
This is recorded hourly as standard practice.
|
24 hours
|
|
Incidence of intravascular epidural placement
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Any incidence of intravascular epidural placement during labour will be recorded.
|
24 hours
|
|
Incidence of catheter dislodgement
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Any incidence of catheter dislodgement during labour will be recorded.
|
24 hours
|
|
Motor block using Bromage scale
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Bromage scale will be recorded hourly as standard practice.
|
24 hours
|
|
Presence of paresthesia on insertion.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Any presence of paresthesia on insertion will be recorded.
|
1 hour
|
|
Adequacy of conversion to surgical block if required for cesarean delivery: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Adequacy of conversion to surgical block in cases requiring cesarean deliveries for failed labor or fetal issues.
This will be recorded by the anesthesiologist.
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mrinalini Balki, MD, Mount Sinai Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21-06
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Pain
-
Antalya Bilim UniversityCompletedChildbirth | Normal Labor | Labor Pain and to Reduce PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Pınar ErdoğanCompletedLabor Progress | Labor Pain and AnxietyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Soovu Labs Inc.Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Bogomolets National Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergCompleted
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminated
-
Roi TreisterHillel Yaffe Medical CenterNot yet recruitingLabor Pain and to Reduce PainIsrael
-
Aretaieio HospitalRecruitingLabor Pain | Pain, Labor | EpiduralGreece
Clinical Trials on Epidural catheter
-
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang UniversityCompleted
-
Ohio State UniversityWithdrawnAdministration Methods of Labor AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterCompletedPost-operative PainUnited States
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
King Hussein Cancer CenterCompletedPost Operative Pain | Epidural Catheter
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingPost-Dural Puncture Headache | Analgesia, Obstetrical
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedAbdominal NeoplasmsEgypt
-
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalAnkara City Hospital BilkentCompletedEpidural Analgesia | Pain Management | Epidural Catheter | Geriatric Cardiology | Urologic Disorders | Hemodynamic (MAP) StabilityTurkey
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityRecruiting