Optimum Length of Catheter in the Epidural Space for Labor Analgesia in Non-obese Women: a Randomised Controlled Trial of 4 cm Versus 5 cm

Epidural analgesia was introduced to the world of obstetrics in 1909 by Walter Stoeckel. Over the following 100 years it has developed to become the gold-standard for delivery of intra-partum analgesia, with between 60 and 75% of North American parturients receiving an epidural during their labor. Effective labor analgesia has been shown to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. One aspect of catheter insertion that has not been fully evaluated, and with very little recent work undertaken, is the optimal length of epidural catheter to be left in the epidural space. Dislodgement or displacement of epidural catheter remains a significant cause for failure with analgesia. Novel methods of fixation may further reduce the risk of catheter migration. Another factor is the direction of travel within the epidural space, only 13% of lumbar catheters remain uncoiled after insertion of more than 4 cm into the epidural space.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that catheters inserted to 4 cm will have a lower rate of failure when compared to those inserted to 5 cm.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the difference in quality of labor analgesia delivered by epidural catheters inserted to either 4 or 5 cm into the epidural space.

This study will be conducted as an interventional double-blinded randomised control trial to establish best practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Effective labor analgesia has been shown to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. It is of paramount importance to the obstetric anesthesiologist to optimize the quality of labor analgesia and identify any factors leading to ineffective epidural analgesia. One aspect of catheter insertion that has not been fully evaluated, and with very little recent work undertaken, is the optimal length of epidural catheter to be left in the epidural space.

Previous studies have advocated, for varying reasons, different lengths of catheter to be left in the space; these range from 2cm to 8cm. Longer epidural lengths in the space can be associated with foraminal escape, leading to unilateral block, and intravascular insertion, prompting additional manipulation. Shorter lengths have previously been associated with more frequent dislodgement. The directionality of the epidural catheter once in the space has been demonstrated to correlate with misdirection.

The aim of the study would be to standardize practice in how much epidural catheter is threaded into the epidural space.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women aged 18 years and above.
  • In established second stage of labor.
  • 3-7 cm dilation at time of insertion.
  • Women with BMI < 40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known contraindication to epidural insertion.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent.
  • Previous difficult epidural insertion.
  • Previous failed epidural.
  • Imminent instrumental or operative delivery.
  • Dural puncture.
  • Combined spinal epidural analgesia.
  • High BMI > 40 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 4 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 4 cm.
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Other Names:
  • epidural
Active Comparator: 5 cm epidural catheter
The epidural catheter will be thread into the epidural space at a length of 5 cm.
The epidural catheter length will vary, either 4 cm or 5 cm into the epidural space.
Other Names:
  • epidural

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory block level < T10
Time Frame: 1 hour

Sensory block level to ice will be measured 1 hour after the loading dose is administered.

Yes: inadequate block No: adequate block

1 hour
Block height discrepancy
Time Frame: 24 hours

Unilateral block or block height discrepancy of >3 dermatomal levels at any time prior to delivery.

Yes: inadequate block No: adequate block

24 hours
Re-siting of the epidural
Time Frame: 24 hours

Re-siting of the epidural at any time during labour will indicate an inadequate block, for any of the following reasons:

  • Inadequate analgesia
  • Persistent unilateral block
  • Persistent intravascular placement
  • Extensive motor block
  • Hypotension
  • High block
24 hours
Adjustment of catheter length
Time Frame: 24 hours
Adjustment of catheter length at any time during labour would also indicate an inadequate block.
24 hours
Abandonment of epidural or substitute for alternative method of analgesia after initial failure: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
The epidural analgesia will also be considered inadequate if the procedure is abandoned or another method of analgesia is used. This will be recorded by the anesthesiologist.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score >3 at any time during labour: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) greater than 3, where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever.
24 hours
Number of epidural top-ups administered by the nursing team
Time Frame: 24 hours
The number of times the labour and delivery nurse has to administer a top-up of the epidural.
24 hours
Number of epidural top-ups administered by the anesthesiologist
Time Frame: 24 hours
The number of times the anesthesiologist has to administer a top-up of the epidural.
24 hours
Pain scores recorded throughout labour: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS), where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever. A verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) greater than 3, where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain ever.
24 hours
Hourly sensory block height assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours
Hourly sensory block height assessment, using sensation to ice. This is recorded hourly as standard practice.
24 hours
Incidence of intravascular epidural placement
Time Frame: 24 hours
Any incidence of intravascular epidural placement during labour will be recorded.
24 hours
Incidence of catheter dislodgement
Time Frame: 24 hours
Any incidence of catheter dislodgement during labour will be recorded.
24 hours
Motor block using Bromage scale
Time Frame: 24 hours

Bromage scale will be recorded hourly as standard practice.

  • 3: Unable to move feet or knees
  • 2: Able to move feet only
  • 1: Able to just move knees
  • 0: Full flexion of knees and feet
24 hours
Presence of paresthesia on insertion.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Any presence of paresthesia on insertion will be recorded.
1 hour
Adequacy of conversion to surgical block if required for cesarean delivery: questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 hours
Adequacy of conversion to surgical block in cases requiring cesarean deliveries for failed labor or fetal issues. This will be recorded by the anesthesiologist.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mrinalini Balki, MD, Mount Sinai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Epidural catheter

Subscribe