- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04964778
SKED Physiology Study
August 2, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
A Comparison of Respiratory Status and Comfort of Various Patient Packaging and Transport Configurations on Horizontal Ground
A SKED© is a stretcher typically used for for confined space, high angle, or technical rescue.
SKED© is not an acronym; the word came from fusing two words: "Sled" and "Skid."
Over the last several years, as recommendations for spinal protection and utilization of adjunct field hardware for patient application changes, there have been conflicting training and practice regarding optimizing patient packaging utilizing the SKED© system.
Specifically, there is disagreement in terms of optimal packaging to ensure no decompensation of respiratory status of the patient objectively, as well as comfort level subjectively solely related to the packaging method utilized.
Several training bodies currently employ different practices of packaging including use of an Oregon Spine Splint-II© (OSS-II) system within a SKED©, foam padding, vacuum mattress configuration, or even no additional adjunct at all.
The objective of this study is to determine whether adjuncts to the SKED© system impact respiratory physiology, or patient comfort while being dragged over horizontal ground.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will be a randomized controlled, non-blinded trial The setting of this study will be an area of level ground, outdoors at a state park.
Study enrollment goal is 50 subjects.
This was determined by review of statistics from similar studies, available funding and time frame allocated to complete the study.
There is not planned interim analysis, and no criteria for ending the study early.
Each participant will be packaged using a SKED© system with no assumed spinal injury.
Each subject will be packaged with SKED© only; SKED©+OSS-II©; SKED©+Vacuum mattress; SKED©+foam padding.
Each patient packaged within their respective systems as one unit will be subject to a 30 meter controlled drag over terrain chosen to mimic a standard dry backcountry extrication drag.
Then carried back to the start by a 4 person carry team to simulate a carry out scenario.
The same 30 meter ground area will be used for all systems.
Built in safety during the drag includes a manually monitored electric winch system with load cells and two safety operators walking alongside the packaged patient.
Target movement will be approximately 1.5-2 miles per hour.
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy adults
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant females
- Incarcerated individuals
- Anyone with difficulty with enclosed or restrictive spaces
- Subjects with a history of lung disease such as Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm1: SKED© only first
Each participant will be packaged using a SKED© system with no assumed spinal injury.
Each arm will consist of the same interventions in a specified, but unique order.
Arm 1 will be in the following order: SKED© only; SKED©+OSS-II©; SKED©+Vacuum mattress; SKED©+foam padding
|
A SKED device is lightweight plastic stretcher used for moving patients through difficult terrain.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 2: SKED©+Vacuum mattress first
Each participant will be packaged using a SKED© system with no assumed spinal injury.
Each arm will consist of the same interventions in a specified, but unique order.
Arm 2 will be in the following order: SKED©+Vacuum mattress; SKED©+OSS-II©; SKED©+foam padding, SKED© only
|
A SKED device is lightweight plastic stretcher used for moving patients through difficult terrain.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 3: SKED©+OSS-II© first
Each participant will be packaged using a SKED© system with no assumed spinal injury.
Each arm will consist of the same interventions in a specified, but unique order.
Arm 3 will be in the following order: SKED©+OSS-II©;SKED©+Vacuum mattress; SKED© only; SKED©+foam padding
|
A SKED device is lightweight plastic stretcher used for moving patients through difficult terrain.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 4: SKED©+foam padding first
Each participant will be packaged using a SKED© system with no assumed spinal injury.
Each arm will consist of the same interventions in a specified, but unique order.
Arm 4 will be in the following order: SKED©+foam padding, SKED©+Vacuum mattress; SKED© only; SKED©+OSS-II
|
A SKED device is lightweight plastic stretcher used for moving patients through difficult terrain.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Likert Pain Scale
Time Frame: Minute 1
|
Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
|
Minute 1
|
|
Likert Pain Scale
Time Frame: Minute 5
|
Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
|
Minute 5
|
|
Borg Dyspnea scale
Time Frame: Minute 1
|
Measures difficulty breathing.
Score ranges from 0-10 with higher score denoting more breathlessness.
|
Minute 1
|
|
Borg Dyspnea scale
Time Frame: Minute 5
|
Measures difficulty breathing.
Score ranges from 0-10 with higher score denoting more breathlessness.
|
Minute 5
|
|
Change in End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2)
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
Change in measurement from baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
|
Change in Pulse Oximetry
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
Test used to measure the oxygen level (oxygen saturation) of the blood.
Oximetry will be compared between interventions and baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
|
Change in Heart Rate
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
Change in beats per minute from baseline
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
|
Change in Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5.
|
Change in breaths per minute from baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5.
|
|
Change in Spirometry values for Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
FVC is the maximum amount of air a person can expel from the lungs after a maximum inhalation.
Change in FVC from baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
|
Change in Spirometry values for Forced Expiratory Volume in 6 seconds (FEV6)
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
FEV6 is the volume of air forcefully exhaled after 6 seconds.
Change in FEV6 from baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
|
Change in Spirometry values for Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV)
Time Frame: Between baseline and minute 5
|
MVV is a spirometry test that measures the.
largest volume that can be moved into and out of the lungs during a 10-15 second interval with voluntary effort.
Change in MVV from baseline.
|
Between baseline and minute 5
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Davis, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 7, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
July 16, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 7, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2023
Last Verified
August 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00072899
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Comparison of Patient Packaging and Transport Methods
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Ankara Diskapi Training and Research HospitalUnknownComparison of Different Laryngeal Mask Wearing MethodsTurkey
-
Istanbul Training and Research HospitalWithdrawnContraceptive Methods ComparisonTurkey
-
Baskent University Ankara HospitalCompletedComparison of the Effects of Remifentanil and DexmedetomidineTurkey
-
i4HealthCompassionate Mind FoundationCompletedComparison of Internet-based CBT and CMTUnited States
-
Erasme University HospitalRecruitingComparison of Pregnancy Rate (HCG+ Level) Obtained After a Replacement Embryonic in Spontaneous Cycle and Following Protocol "NPP". ComparisonBelgium
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfOregon Health and Science University; CSEM Centre Suisse d'Electronique et...WithdrawnComparison of Availability for Prediction of Volume Responsiveness | Comparison of Limits of Agreement for Invasive and Non-invasive Measurement of Stroke Volume VariationGermany
-
Anna Rita Daniele, MDAlcon ResearchCompletedComparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryItaly
-
MidAtlantic RetinaAlcon ResearchCompletedComparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryUnited States
-
Hasse Moller-SorensenCompletedComparison of CardioQ and Thermodilution Derived Cardiac Output MeasurementsDenmark
Clinical Trials on SKED©
-
Fondation Oeuvre de la Croix Saint-SimonWithdrawnPain | Anxiety | BandageFrance
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamLakeshore FoundationWithdrawnExercise | Disability Physical
-
Queen's UniversityTerminatedLateral EpicondylitisCanada
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedCuff Overinflation | Cuff UnderinflationFrance
-
Temple UniversityUnknownCritical Limb IschemiaUnited States
-
Radboud University Medical CenterMaastricht University Medical Center; Fresenius KabiRecruitingRisk of MalnutritionNetherlands
-
University Health Network, TorontoJewish General Hospital; Lakeridge Health Corporation; Red Deer Regional Hospital...CompletedStroke | DysphagiaCanada
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoCompletedCognitive Impairment | Sedentary Behavior
-
Pansatori GmbHCompetence Center for Medical Devices GmbHUnknown
-
University of ValenciaCompletedDental Arch Relationship Anomaly