iBAILA - Investigating Brains & Activity to Improve Latino Aging

May 11, 2023 updated by: David Xavier Marquez, University of Illinois at Chicago
Examine the impact of the BAILAMOS (TM) dance program on lifestyle physical activity

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Examine the impact of the BAILAMOS (TM) dance program on lifestyle physical activity (PA). Hypothesis 1: Intervention group will demonstrate greater improvement in Lifestyle PA than controls. 2) Test the impact of BAILAMOS (TM) on cognitive function and quality of life. Hypothesis 2: Intervention group will demonstrate greater improvement in cognitive function and quality of life than controls. 3) Test the impact of BAILAMOS (TM) on brain network functional connectivity. Hypothesis 3: Intervention group will demonstrate enhanced Default Mode Network (DMN), Executive Network (EN), and sensorimotor network connectivity vis a vis controls.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 60 years;
  • Latino/Hispanic;
  • ability to speak Spanish;
  • participation in <150 minutes/week of aerobic exercise;
  • adequate cognitive status as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (>14/21);
  • danced < 2 times/month over the past 12 months;
  • willingness to be randomly assigned to treatment or control group;
  • no plans to leave the U.S. > two weeks during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus;
  • pacemaker or metallic implants (infusion pumps, metal prostheses, metallic-backed transdermal patches or metallic shrapnel); - claustrophobia that precludes MRI;
  • stroke within the past year;
  • healing or unhealed fracture(s);
  • hip or knee replacement within the past 6 months;
  • heart failure;
  • recurrent falls within the past year;
  • regular use of a walker or wheelchair;
  • weigh more than 300 pounds, as unable to fit into MRI. The EASY (Resnick et al., 2008) will be used to learn if physician consent is needed for program enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BAILAMOS©
BAILAMOS© includes a 4-month, twice-weekly dance program. The PI and a professional dance instructor co-developed an extensive BAILAMOS© Dance Manual and class-by-class schedule.
BAILAMOS© includes a 4-month, twice-weekly dance program. The PI and a professional dance instructor co-developed an extensive BAILAMOS© Dance Manual and class-by-class schedule.
No Intervention: Control
Randomized to wait list, received BAILAMOS© program after data collection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Adults
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up) .The 4-month post-intervention follow-up assesses average physical activity over the past 4 weeks.
Report minutes of moderate to vigorous level physical activity per week. Weekly frequency and duration of physical activity is used to calculate minutes of moderate to vigorous level physical activity (MVPA) per week.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up) .The 4-month post-intervention follow-up assesses average physical activity over the past 4 weeks.
Activity Counts Per Minute (CPM).
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measured through a wrist-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph Model GT3X) worn for 7 days.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trail Making Test (TMT) Part A
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure of executive function. In part A, the subject connects a series of encircled numbers in numerical order. In part B, the subject connects encircled numbers and letters in numerical and alphabetical order, alternating between the numbers and letters. TMT score is the time in seconds it takes the subject to complete the test. A lower score/time is better. TMT A scores range from 0-180 seconds and TMT B scores range from 0-300 seconds. Raw scores were converted to z-scores utilizing baseline means and standard deviations. Z-scores were then combined into composite scores of executive function.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Stroop C (Color)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure of executive function. The Stroop test assesses the ability to inhibit cognitive interference. Color-words are printed in inconsistent color ink. Subjects are asked to name the color of the ink and not read the word. Score range is the number of words named correctly minus errors in 30 seconds and ranges from 0-77. Higher scores reflect better performance and less interference on reading ability. Raw scores were converted to z-scores utilizing baseline means and standard deviations. Z-scores were then combined into composite scores of executive function.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Stroop C-W (Color-word Test) of the Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure of executive function. The Stroop test assesses the ability to inhibit cognitive interference. Color-words are printed in inconsistent color ink. Subjects are asked to name the color of the ink and not read the word. Score range is the number of words named correctly minus errors in 30 seconds and ranges from 0-77. Higher scores reflect better performance and less interference on reading ability. Raw scores were converted to z-scores utilizing baseline means and standard deviations. Z-scores were then combined into composite scores of executive function.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Verbal Fluency Test - Animals
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
This is a widely used measure of verbal fluency (or semantic memory) in which the participant is asked to generate exemplars of each of two categories (animals, fruits and vegetables) within a 60-second time limit. The primary measure of performance is the number of unique exemplars generated within the time limit. The score is the total number of animals (Animal Total) and vegetables (Vegetable Total) named within the time limit. A higher score means a better outcome. Scores range from 0 with no upper limit.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Symbol Digit Modalities Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure of the speed of perceptual processing in which the participant is asked to identify and name the numbers which belong with consecutively presented symbols for 90 seconds. The score is the number of digits correctly identified within the 90-second time limit - a higher score means a better outcome. Scores range from 0 to 110.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Digit Span Test - Forward
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
This is a widely used measure of working memory (or attention) in which the participant is read number sequences of increasing length and then asked to repeat each sequence forward (Digits Forward) or backward (Digits Backward). The primary measure of performance is the number of digit sequences correctly recalled in each subpart (Digits Forward, Digits Backward). Each sequence for Digits Forward and Digits Backward is scored as error (0) or correct (1) - a higher score means a better outcome.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Digit Ordering Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
This is a measure of working memory in which the participant is read number sequences of increasing length and is then asked to reorder the digits and say them in ascending order. Score range is 0 - 12 with a higher score meaning a better outcome.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Logical Memory I (Immediate) Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure This is a measure of memory (declarative/episodic) in which a brief story is read to P who is then asked to retell it from memory immediately (I) and after a delay (II). The primary measure of performance is the number of story units recalled. Score is the sum of story units (25) correctly recalled. Scores range from 0 - 25 with a higher score meaning a better outcome.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Logical Memory II (Delayed) Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure This is a measure of memory (declarative/episodic) in which a brief story is read to P who is then asked to retell it from memory immediately (I) and after a delay (II). The primary measure of performance is the number of story units recalled. Score is the sum of story units (25) correctly recalled. Scores range from 0 - 25 with a higher score meaning a better outcome.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Global
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Frontal
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Temporal
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Parietal
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Occipital
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Anterior Cingulate
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Posterior Cingulate
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Cerebral White Matter Volume - Isthmus of the Cingulate
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral White Matter Hyper-intensities
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed through magnetic resonance imaging scans
Baseline
Cerebral Functional Connectivity - Default Mode Network
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Functional connectivity is defined as a correlation of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal from each brain network defined by prespecified regions of interest. Whole-brain images were acquired on a GE MR 750 Discovery 3-T scanner using an 8-channel head coil. Functional connectomes were generated using the resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) toolbox. Using the "networks.nii" (with ROIs defined from CONN's ICA analyses of HCP dataset/497 subjects), functional brain networks (e.g., DMN, FPN, SAL, and language) were derived using pairwise BOLD signal correlations, which were then converted to z-scores using Fisher's r-to-z transformation. The DMN, FPN, and SAL were selected as networks of interest due to evidence of the effects of aging and PA on these networks. The language network was selected as a control network.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Cerebral Functional Connectivity - Frontoparietal Network
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Functional connectivity is defined as a correlation of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal from each brain network defined by prespecified regions of interest. Whole-brain images were acquired on a GE MR 750 Discovery 3-T scanner using an 8-channel head coil. Functional connectomes were generated using the resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) toolbox. Using the "networks.nii" (with ROIs defined from CONN's ICA analyses of HCP dataset/497 subjects), functional brain networks (e.g., DMN, FPN, SAL, and language) were derived using pairwise BOLD signal correlations, which were then converted to z-scores using Fisher's r-to-z transformation. The DMN, FPN, and SAL were selected as networks of interest due to evidence of the effects of aging and PA on these networks. The language network was selected as a control network.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Cerebral Functional Connectivity - Salience Network
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Functional connectivity is defined as a correlation of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal from each brain network defined by prespecified regions of interest. Whole-brain images were acquired on a GE MR 750 Discovery 3-T scanner using an 8-channel head coil. Functional connectomes were generated using the resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) toolbox. Using the "networks.nii" (with ROIs defined from CONN's ICA analyses of HCP dataset/497 subjects), functional brain networks (e.g., DMN, FPN, SAL, and language) were derived using pairwise BOLD signal correlations, which were then converted to z-scores using Fisher's r-to-z transformation. The DMN, FPN, and SAL were selected as networks of interest due to evidence of the effects of aging and PA on these networks. The language network was selected as a control network.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Cerebral Functional Connectivity - Language Network
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Functional connectivity is defined as a correlation of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal from each brain network defined by prespecified regions of interest. Whole-brain images were acquired on a GE MR 750 Discovery 3-T scanner using an 8-channel head coil. Functional connectomes were generated using the resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) toolbox. Using the "networks.nii" (with ROIs defined from CONN's ICA analyses of HCP dataset/497 subjects), functional brain networks (e.g., DMN, FPN, SAL, and language) were derived using pairwise BOLD signal correlations, which were then converted to z-scores using Fisher's r-to-z transformation. The DMN, FPN, and SAL were selected as networks of interest due to evidence of the effects of aging and PA on these networks. The language network was selected as a control network.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Trail Making Test (TMT) Part B
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Measure of executive function. In part A, the subject connects a series of encircled numbers in numerical order. In part B, the subject connects encircled numbers and letters in numerical and alphabetical order, alternating between the numbers and letters. TMT score is the time in seconds it takes the subject to complete the test. A lower score/time is better. TMT A scores range from 0-180 seconds and TMT B scores range from 0-300 seconds. Raw scores were converted to z-scores utilizing baseline means and standard deviations. Z-scores were then combined into composite scores of executive function.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Verbal Fluency Test - Fruits and Vegetables
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
This is a widely used measure of verbal fluency (or semantic memory) in which the participant is asked to generate exemplars of each of two categories (animals, fruits and vegetables) within a 60-second time limit. The primary measure of performance is the number of unique exemplars generated within the time limit. The score is the total number of animals (Animal Total) and vegetables (Vegetable Total) named within the time limit. A higher score means a better outcome. Scores range from 0 with no upper limit.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
Digit Span Test - Backward
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months (follow up)
This is a widely used measure of working memory (or attention) in which the participant is read number sequences of increasing length and then asked to repeat each sequence forward (Digits Forward) or backward (Digits Backward). The primary measure of performance is the number of digit sequences correctly recalled in each subpart (Digits Forward, Digits Backward). Each sequence for Digits Forward and Digits Backward is scored as error (0) or correct (1) - a higher score means a better outcome.
Baseline and 4 months (follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David X Marquez, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-0497

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on BAILAMOS©

3
Subscribe