The Mechanism for the Effects of Joint Biomechanical Properties on Medial Cartilage of Tibiofemoral Joint Degeneration

July 8, 2021 updated by: Ren Shuang, Peking University Third Hospital
Explore The Mechanism for the Effects of Joint Biomechanical Properties on Medial Cartilage of Tibiofemoral Joint Degeneration

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cartilage degeneration in the medial tibiofemoral joint is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), which may develop into knee osteoarthritis (disability rate 21.3%). Alterations in joint biomechanical properties play an important role in cartilage degeneration after ACLR. However, the mechanism remains unclear.

Our research studied the joint kinematics and kinetics properties after ACLR and found significant changes in biomechanics in the ACLR knees. Therefore, this study will combine longitude biochemical changes in the cartilage to explore how the alterations in biomechanics would influence biochemical changes in the joint cartilage.

This study will explore the joint biomechanical properties during functional activities by motion analysis, the effects of biomechanical properties on cartilage stress distribution by finite element analysis, the long-term biochemical changes in the joint cartilage by functional MRI. This study will establish prediction models for cartilage biomechanical changes in the mid-term based on joint biomechanical properties in the early stage after ACLR, and cartilage biomechanical changes in the long-term based on joint biomechanical properties in the mid-term after ACLR. The study aims to clarify the mechanism of cartilage degeneration after ACLR and search biomechanical risk factors, in order to provide methods for clinical prevention of cartilage degeneration after ACLR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Thirty patients with ACL rupture undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery at the Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital would be included in the study cohort were included, A total of 30 healthy volunteers with no history of musculoskeletal system injury or surgery in bilateral lower extremities would be included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Unilateral ACL rupture of the knee

Exclusion Criteria:

concomitant with other ligament injury or rupture, with history of surgery or musculoskeletal system injury of the contralateral knee, and the time from injury to operation more than 8 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
healthy volunteers
gait testing and MRI at baseline for healthy volunteers
diagnostic tests including the gait testing and functional MRI
ACL-deficient patients
gait testing and MRI at pre-operation, 6 months post-operation, 1 year post-operation, 2 years post-operation
diagnostic tests including the gait testing and functional MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
knee T1 rho value
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
On the day of enrollment.
knee T1 rho value
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 6 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 12 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 2 years post operation.
knee T2 value
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
On the day of enrollment.
knee T2 value
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 6 months post operation.
knee T2 value
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 12 months post operation.
knee T2 value
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
knee T1 rho value by functional MRI
At 2 years post operation.
knee extension angles
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
On the day of enrollment.
knee extension angles
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 6 months post operation.
knee extension angles
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 12 months post operation.
knee extension angles
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 2 years post operation.
knee moments
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
On the day of enrollment.
knee moments
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 6 months post operation.
knee moments
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 12 months post operation.
knee moments
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 2 years post operation.
ground reaction force
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
On the day of enrollment.
ground reaction force
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 6 months post operation.
ground reaction force
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 12 months post operation.
ground reaction force
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 2 years post operation.
knee rotation angles
Time Frame: On the day of enrollment.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
On the day of enrollment.
knee rotation angles
Time Frame: At 6 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 6 months post operation.
knee rotation angles
Time Frame: At 12 months post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 12 months post operation.
knee rotation angles
Time Frame: At 2 years post operation.
Three-dimensional gait analysis system and plantar pressure were used during walking, running, cutting and jumping
At 2 years post operation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shuang Ren, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Clinical Trials on gait testing, functional MRI

Subscribe