Freestyle Libre and Hospital Admissions in Type 2 Diabetes (STRATUS)

September 7, 2021 updated by: Ramzi Ajjan, University of Leeds

FreeSTyle LibRe and hospitAl Admissions, morTality and qUality of Life in High Risk Type 2 diabeteS Patients

This study aims to investigate the utility of a combination of structured nurse led intervention and the use of Freestyle libre in adults with type 2 diabetes who have suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia in terms of mortality, unscheduled healthcare contacts and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is increasingly recognised that hypoglycaemia carries risk to individuals with all forms of diabetes. Research has shown high rate of mortality in those with type 2 diabetes following an episode of severe hypoglycaemia and a previous pilot trial conducted in the UK suggested that this could be improved by a structured nurse led intervention aimed at modifying glycemic therapy to avoid hypoglycaemia, instigating regular blood glucose monitoring and providing education to participants on common triggers for hypoglycaemia and how to avoid them.

In this trial, the investigators will randomise individuals with type 2 diabetes who have suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia requiring emergency service call out to two arms. One arm will receive standard of care/treatment as usual and the other will receive a structured nurse led intervention as well as the use of a flash glucose monitoring system, Freestyle libre.

Active participation in the trial for both arms will be a total of twelve months (with the main intervention months 0-6.) Participants electronic records will be analysed for death and unscheduled healthcare contacts for a total of two years after recruitment.

The primary outcome measure is mortality between groups. Secondary outcomes include the use of estimated HbA1c (a variable produced by the freestyle libre device) compared to laboratory HbA1c, quality of life measures, effects on glycemic control and the number of unscheduled healthcare contacts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • West Yorkshire
      • Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, LS97TF
        • Diabetes centre, St James hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged >18
  • Confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • Suffered an episode of severe hypoglycaemia requiring ambulance call out
  • Able to provide informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

  • A form of diabetes mellitus which is not type 2 or the diagnosis is uncertain
  • Currently pregnant
  • Dialysis dependent renal failure
  • Unable to provide informed written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
Participants are returned to the care of their usual diabetes care provider following randomisation. They will donate blood and urine samples as well as completing diabetes specific questionnaires at 0 and 6 months. They will also wear a blinded glucose sensor (freestyle Libre PRO) for a two week period at month 6.
Experimental: Intervention arm
Participants will be randomised at baseline. They will provide blood and urine samples at months 0 and 6 as well as fill in diabetes specific questionnaires. They will receive education surrounding hypoglycaemia at baseline from a diabetes specialist nurse. They will wear a freestyle libre device which is changed every two weeks for a period of 6 months. At weeks 2,4,12 and 24 they will have their diabetes medication adjusted by the diabetes specialist nurse/diabetes doctor according to their blood glucose profiles, analysed from the data generated by freestyle libre.
A glucose sensor (flash) which measures interstitial blood glucose every 15 minutes or on demand.
An education programme surrounding avoidance of hypoglycaemia at baseline. Regular review (weeks 2, 4, 12 and 24) and adjustment of diabetes medications based on freestyle libre data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Rates of death between groups at 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality at 1 year
Time Frame: 12 months
Mortality at 12 months from randomisation
12 months
Cardiovascular mortality at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
Mortality from a cardiovascular cause at 1 year
1 year
Cardiovascular mortality at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Mortality from a cardiovascular cause at 2 years
2 years
Number of unscheduled healthcare contacts
Time Frame: 2 years after randomisation
Number of unscheduled healthcare contacts (emergency services, hospital attendances, primary care attendances) 1 year prior to randomisation and 2 years after
2 years after randomisation
Comparison between estimated HbA1c and laboratory HbA1c
Time Frame: 6 months
A comparison between estimated HbA1c (freestyle libre generated) and laboratory HbA1c values across the whole study cohort at 0 and 6 months
6 months
Change from baseline in HbA1c
Time Frame: 6 months
Change from baseline HbA1c at 6 months between both groups
6 months
Scores from Diabetes distress scale
Time Frame: Tested at 0 and 6 months
A questionnaire which assessed the emotional burden diabetes has on the participant. 4 different domains are tested across 17 questions. An overall score is calculated (each question is ranked 1-6 by participants) and the total score is divided by 17. The higher the score (1-6) the more diabetes distress the participant is under. Scores are also calculated across each domain. These are 1) emotional burden 2) Physician associated distress 3) regimen associated distress 4) interpersonal distress
Tested at 0 and 6 months
Scores from diabetes quality of life scale (DQOL)
Time Frame: Tested at 0 and 6 months
This is a questionnaire with 15 questions filled in by participants. Each question is ranked 1-5 with a score of 5 conveying the worst score. Scores therefore range from 15 to 75 with a score of 75 indicating very poor quality of life as a result of diabetes and 15 very good.
Tested at 0 and 6 months
Scores from treatment satisfaction scale (DTSQc)
Time Frame: Tested at 0 and 6 months
This is a questionnaire assessing participant satisfaction with the treatment of their diabetes. It comprises 8 questions with each scored from 3 to negative 3. A score of 3 on a question indicates very good satisfaction whereas negative 3 that the participant is most dissatisfied. Therefore a maximum score of 24 is possible with a low score of negative 24. The higher the score, the more satisfied the participant is with their diabetes treatment.
Tested at 0 and 6 months
Scores from GOLD score
Time Frame: Tested at 0 and 6 months
A 1-7 scale which asks participants how likely they are to recognise hypoglycaemia. 7 indicates they have severe hypoglycaemia awareness and 1 that they are fully hypoglycaemic aware. Therefore the higher the score, the more hypoglycaemic unawareness the participant perceives themself as having.
Tested at 0 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramzi A Ajjan, PHD, University of Leeds

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised data will be available on reasonable request to the investigators

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Freestyle libre

Subscribe