Effect of Reconditioning Exercise on Older Adults With Urinary Tract Cancer Following Curative Surgery

November 23, 2023 updated by: Pei-Yun Lee, National Cheng Kung University

Effectiveness of Reconditioning Exercise on Mobility and Functional Recovery in Older Adults With Urinary Tract Cancer Following Curative Surgery

As population ages, geriatric patients with urinary tract cancer suffer from more complications and functional decline that alter treatment plan despite advance in cancer surgery. It was found that these urinary tract cancer survivors required a longer time to recover to the state before the treatment, and some may be even unable to recover to the state before the treatment. Exercise intervention has been found to be beneficial to improve functional capacity for cancer survivors, such as breast cancer. However, it is unclear whether exercise intervention could also improve functional recovery and mobility in patients with urinary tract cancer following curative surgery, especially in older adults. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of reconditioning exercise on morbidity, oncological outcomes, and functional recovery in older adults with urinary tract cancer following curative surgery.

Patients aged over 65 years old and after having undergone curative surgery for confirmed urinary tract cancer will be recruited. The participants will be assigned into two groups using blocked randomization design. One group will receive reconditioning exercise training for five consecutive days, and the other group will receive exercise education. Structured questionnaire for comprehensive geriatric assessment and functional mobility, such as walking performance, will be used to assess the training effect. Outcome measures are assessed including major complication after surgeries, changes in functional status, tumor progression, and length of survival. Physical function measurement will include hand grip, muscle strength of lower extremities, and gait performance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan city, Taiwan
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 100 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • after having undergone curative surgery for confirmed urinary tract cancer
  • able to independently walk for at least 8 meters before surgery
  • able to follow 3-step commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having unstable medical conditions or metastasis
  • having neuromuscular diseases, such as stroke, Parkinson's diseases
  • unable to attend training sessions
  • having other health issues which would interfere evaluation and exercise training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
Provide resistance and aerobic exercise
Progressive resistance exercise and graded aerobic exercise will be provided for those in the experimental group.
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Health education and gross range of motion exercise for upper and lower extremities
Health education and gross joint range of motion exercise for bilateral upper and lower extremities will be provided for those in the control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle strength of the lower extremities
Time Frame: Before training
Muscle strength of bilateral hip flexor,knee extensor, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantarflexor
Before training
Muscle strength of the lower extremities
Time Frame: After five-day training
Muscle strength of bilateral hip flexor,knee extensor, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantarflexor
After five-day training
Muscle strength of the lower extremities
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
Muscle strength of bilateral hip flexor,knee extensor, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantarflexor
Follow up at one month after training
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: Before training
Subjects are asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again.
Before training
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: After five-day training
Subjects are asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again.
After five-day training
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
Subjects are asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again.
Follow up at one month after training
Six minute walk test
Time Frame: Before training
Subjects are instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.
Before training
Six minute walk test
Time Frame: After five-day training
Subjects are instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.
After five-day training
Six minute walk test
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
Subjects are instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.
Follow up at one month after training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strength
Time Frame: Before training
Hand grip strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer.
Before training
Grip strength
Time Frame: After five-day training
Hand grip strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer.
After five-day training
Grip strength
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
Hand grip strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer.
Follow up at one month after training
Modified Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Before training
Measure independence in basic activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers, continence, and feeding. Full score is 32. The lower the score indicates lower dependence in performing daily activities.
Before training
Modified Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: After five-day training
Measure independence in basic activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers, continence, and feeding. Full score is 32. The lower the score indicates lower dependence in performing daily activities.
After five-day training
Modified Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
Measure independence in basic activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers, continence, and feeding. Full score is 32. The lower the score indicates lower dependence in performing daily activities.
Follow up at one month after training
Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale
Time Frame: Before training
To assess more complex activities that allow an individual to live independently in a community, such as shopping, cooking, and managing finances. Full score is 24. The higher the score indicates better function in performing instrumental daily activities.
Before training
Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale
Time Frame: After five-day training
To assess more complex activities that allow an individual to live independently in a community, such as shopping, cooking, and managing finances. Full score is 24. The higher the score indicates better function in performing instrumental daily activities.
After five-day training
Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
To assess more complex activities that allow an individual to live independently in a community, such as shopping, cooking, and managing finances. Full score is 24. The higher the score indicates better function in performing instrumental daily activities.
Follow up at one month after training
The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
Time Frame: Before training
To assess cognitive function, including tests of orientation, memory and recall the date, day of the week, place, telephone or address, birth date, current and etc.
Before training
The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
Time Frame: After five-day training
To assess cognitive function, including tests of orientation, memory and recall the date, day of the week, place, telephone or address, birth date, current and etc.
After five-day training
The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
To assess cognitive function, including tests of orientation, memory and recall the date, day of the week, place, telephone or address, birth date, current and etc.
Follow up at one month after training
The Short-form Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: Before training
To measure depression. The scale consists of 15 questions with a full score of 15. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal; 5-8 indicate mild depression; 9-11 indicate moderate depression; and 12-15 indicate severe depression.
Before training
The Short-form Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: After five-day training
To measure depression. The scale consists of 15 questions with a full score of 15. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal; 5-8 indicate mild depression; 9-11 indicate moderate depression; and 12-15 indicate severe depression.
After five-day training
The Short-form Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: Follow up at one month after training
To measure depression. The scale consists of 15 questions with a full score of 15. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal; 5-8 indicate mild depression; 9-11 indicate moderate depression; and 12-15 indicate severe depression.
Follow up at one month after training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pei-Yun Lee, PhD, National Cheng Kung University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation

Subscribe