Minimal Equipment Training Approach to Improve Warfighter Performance

The Effects of a Minimal Equipment Training Approach Compared to Concurrent Training to Improve Warfighter Health and Performance

The purpose of this project is to compare a minimal equipment training program with and without blood flow restriction (BFR) training to periodized concurrent resistance and endurance training. The outcomes of interest are Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance along with laboratory measures of performance, which include body composition, power, strength, and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). Additionally, based on the role of mechanical tension in connective tissue adaptation and the importance for chronic musculoskeletal health, tendon architecture will be assessed as well. Lastly, specific blood-based biomarkers will be analyzed in conjunction with questionnaires to determine the systemic physiological and psychological responses to training. Participants will be randomized into one of three training groups and will follow their respective program for 6 weeks. The three groups are traditional concurrent resistance and endurance training, minimal equipment training, and minimal equipment training with blood flow restriction (BFR).

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Healthy; Military Operations
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Traditional equipment resistance training; Other: Minimal equipment resistance training; Other: Blood flow restriction training

Detailed Description

The efficacy of minimal equipment training programs with an emphasis on resistance training has seldom been assessed and compared to traditional strength training. Common training strategies include traditional high-to-moderate load resistance training and low-to-moderate load field training using minimal equipment. The benefit of traditional CT is likely due to the higher loads relative to 1-repetition maximum (1RM) utilized and overall amount of mechanical stress incurred. It is difficult to mimic this loading with minimal equipment training, which is often performed at low loads relative to 1RM. However, one strategy to improve the effectiveness of minimal equipment training may be the addition of blood flow restriction (BFR) training. Due to the relatively low loads (20-70% 1RM) of minimal equipment training, BFR training not only provides athletes with a novel training modality to elicit hypertrophic and strength adaptation but also to augment recovery as a supplemental low-damage, high-volume training method. The research design will allow for the direct comparison of minimal equipment training with and without additional BFR training to periodized CT with regard to changes in outcomes, in particular, ACFT performance.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 54
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • South Carolina
    • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
      • University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 35 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males and females between the ages of 18 and 35 (inclusive) and enrolled in an ROTC program.
• Subject has provided written and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
• Subject is in good health as determined by medical history and is cleared for exercise.

• Subject will be asked about dietary supplementation use within the past 6 months.

  • If subject began taking a supplement within the past month, subject will be asked to discontinue supplement use followed by a 2-week washout prior to participation.
  • In all other cases, we will request that subjects maintain supplement use.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subjects with any musculoskeletal injuries that would prevent exercising.
• Subjects with any metabolic disorder including known electrolyte abnormalities, diabetes, thyroid disease, adrenal disease or hypogonadism.
• Subjects with any inborn error of metabolism.
• Subjects with a history of hepatorenal, musculoskeletal, autoimmune, or neurologic disease.
• Subjects with a personal history of heart disease, high blood pressure (systolic >140 mm Hg & diastolic >90 mm Hg), psychiatric disorders, cancer, benign prostate hypertrophy, gastric ulcer, reflux disease, or any other medical condition deemed ineligible to participate in physical training by the ROTC athletic trainers or ROTC medical staff.
• Subjects currently taking thyroid, hyperlipidemic, hypoglycemic, anti-hypertensive, or anti-coagulant medications.
• Subjects who are pregnant or lactating.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional equipment resistance and endurance training; Participants in this group undergo 6 weeks of concurrent resistance and endurance training using traditional equipment (i.e., power racks, barbells, dumbbells, etc.)	Other: Traditional equipment resistance training; Participants will undergo 6 weeks of traditional equipment resistance training
Experimental: Minimal equipment resistance and endurance training; Participants in this group undergo 6 weeks of concurrent resistance and endurance training using minimal equipment (i.e., sandbags, resistance bands, suspension trainers, weight vests, etc.)	Other: Minimal equipment resistance training; Participants will undergo 6 weeks of minimal equipment resistance training
Experimental: Minimal equipment resistance and endurance training with blood flow restriction; Participants in this group undergo 6 weeks of concurrent resistance and endurance training using minimal equipment (i.e., sandbags, resistance bands, suspension trainers, weight vests, etc.) while wearing upper- and lower-body blood-flow restriction cuffs	Other: Minimal equipment resistance training; Participants will undergo 6 weeks of minimal equipment resistance training; Other: Blood flow restriction training; Participants will undergo 6 weeks of blood flow restriction training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Army Combat Fitness Test	6-event task to assess various aspects of human performance (muscular power, muscular strength, muscular endurance, anaerobic capacity, and aerobic capacity). Tests include 3-repetition maximum trap-bar deadlift, standing power throw with 10-lb ball, 2-min hand-release push-ups, sprint-drag-carry, 2-min leg tucks, and 2-mile run.	Baseline and Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in muscular power	Assessed via countermovement vertical jump height.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in muscular strength	Assessed via 3-repetition maximum bench press.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in aerobic capacity	Assessed via treadmill-based maximal graded exercise test with indirect calorimetry.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in body mass	Body mass via calibrated scale.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in body composition	Body fat percentage, fat-free mass, and fat mass via air-displacement plethysmography.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in muscle and tendon thickness	Biceps brachii and quadriceps muscle thickness via B-mode ultrasound and distal biceps tendon and quadriceps tendon via B-mode ultrasound.	Baseline and Week 6
Change in blood-based biomarkers	Basal hormonal and biochemical assessments. Cortisol, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-1β, growth hormone (GH), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).	Baseline and Week 6
Change in blood lactate responses	Biochemical responses to exercise. Blood lactate sampled pre-, mid-, and post-exercise during training sessions in weeks 1, 3, and 6.	Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in training distress	Overall training distress and subscales including depressed moods, vigor, physical signs and symptoms, sleep disturbances, perceived stress, and general fatigue. The Multicomponent Training Distress Scale will be administered weekly.	Baseline and every subsequent week through Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of South Carolina
• Collaborators: United States Department of Defense

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 20, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 4, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): June 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 21, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 11, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 29, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 27, 2023
• Last Verified: November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00103649

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No