Validation of Procalcitonin as a Biomarker Diagnosing CDI ((DIRT II))

May 2, 2022 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

A Prospective Case-control Validation of Procalcitonin as a Biomarker Diagnosing Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Pocket Infection

Cardiac device infections (CDI), especially pocket infections, are difficult to be diagnosed. Device pocket infections are not associated with elevated white blood cell count. CRP is only assoziated with a low sensitivity. The diagnosis of a local pocket infection is challenging and relies primarily on the clinical presentation. The prospective DIRT study identified procalcitonin (PCT) among 14 biomarkers as the most promising biomarker to aid the diagnosis of pocket infection.

The study aims to validate the proposed PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for the diagnosis of pocket infection

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients presenting with cardiac device infection CDI

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• device associated infections

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignancy
  • cytostatic or immunomodulating therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
pocket infection
Patients with isolated pocket infection were diagnosed in the presence of local signs of inflammation (one or more of erythema, pain, warmth, swelling, induration, tenderness, or fluctuation), wound dehiscence, hardware protrusion or pus discharge at the pocket in the absence of systemic findings.
blood samples of all participants were analyzed for procalitonin levels, using a commercially available procalitonin testing kit
CIED systemic infection
Patient s with a CIED systemic infection, diagnosed as the presence of pocket infection accompanied by bacteraemia or echocardiographic finding suggestive of infective endocarditis, but not fulfilling the Duke criteria.
blood samples of all participants were analyzed for procalitonin levels, using a commercially available procalitonin testing kit
Lead-associated infective endocarditis
Patients with infective endocarditis, diagnosed according to modified Duke criteria
blood samples of all participants were analyzed for procalitonin levels, using a commercially available procalitonin testing kit
control group
CIED Patients presenting for elective device exchange or planned lead revision between without local or systemic infections were selected as controls
blood samples of all participants were analyzed for procalitonin levels, using a commercially available procalitonin testing kit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
diagnostic value of PCT
Time Frame: pre-intervention/procedure/surgery. i.e. at the time of CIED explantation. Measurement of PCT as an biomarker revealing the acute infection (like a sepsis marker)
diagnostic value of PCT in differentiating local pocket infection from infection-free controls and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the pre-established cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml
pre-intervention/procedure/surgery. i.e. at the time of CIED explantation. Measurement of PCT as an biomarker revealing the acute infection (like a sepsis marker)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GER-EP-023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections

Clinical Trials on procalcitonin blood test

Subscribe