Effects of Electrical Stimulation and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury.

January 20, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Effects of Electrical Stimulation and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Health Following Spinal Cord Injury

Neurogenic osteoporosis is a common complication of spinal cord injury (SCI) that is associated with low impact bone fractures. It is concerning that more than 46,000 Veterans affected with SCI and are at risk of osteoporosis and possible low impact fractures. About fifty percent of all individuals with SCI will develop low impact fracture in their life time. The management of osteoporosis-related fractures can impose substantial economic burden on the health care system, the individual and the families. Previous studies did not succeed in reversing the process of bone loss after SCI. In the present pilot study, we will evaluate the effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Resistance Training in combination with oral Vitamin D supplementation, on bone quality in Veterans with chronic SCI, using a randomized experimental design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neurogenic osteoporosis is a devastating problem that is likely to impact 46,000 Veterans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). It is typically associated with low impact fractures of long bones and other medical comorbidities. It is estimated that approximately fifty percent of all individuals with SCI will develop low impact fracture during their lifetime. The management of osteoporosis related fractures can impose substantial economic burden on the health care system, individuals with SCI and their families. Advancement in medical research clearly indicated that neurogenic osteoporosis is linked to reduced loading and Vitamin D (Vit D) deficiency. Our pilot work indicated that a simple rehabilitation paradigm targeting towards evoking skeletal muscle hypertrophy may attenuate deterioration in trabecular bone parameters after SCI. Evoked resistance training (RT) using surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown as a successful and feasible home-based approach to load skeletal muscles after SCI. Our earlier results may imply long-term compliance and adherence if successfully applied in conjunction with a telehealth approach. In the present study, we propose a simple home-based approach of using NMES RT in conjunction with oral Vit D supplementation on trabecular bone quality in 20 Veterans with chronic SCI. Data will include measurements of trabecular bone quality as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone biomarkers associated with the process of bone remodeling.

Twenty participants with chronic (> 1-year post-injury) motor complete (AIS A and B) SCI (18 to 65 years of age) will be randomly assigned into either NMES RT plus 2000IU of Vit D (10 participants) or passive movement plus 2000IU Vit D (10 participants) to participate in a repeated measure design trial for 9 months. The NMES RT plus Vit D will undergo 4.5 months of open kinematic chain resistance training followed by 4.5 months of closed kinematic chain using simple rowing approach. This pilot work will have two main specific aims. Aim 1. To determine the impact of home-based NMES RT protocol plus oral Vit D supplementation compared to passive movement plus oral Vit D on bone microarchitectural properties. Aim 2. To determine the impact of home-based NMES RT protocol plus oral Vit D compared to passive movement and Vit D supplementation on biomarkers of bone formation and bone resorption.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249-0001
        • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To be included, participants will have to:

  • Be 18-65 years of age
  • Have history of traumatic SCI ( 1-year) with NLI of C8-T10 and AIS A or B (confirmed by AIS examination performed by PI or a qualified Provider
  • Have a caregiver who is available and willing to be trained to apply intervention protocol in the home (placing weights and positioning the Veteran) throughout study duration
  • Be a wheelchair user for primary mode of mobility
  • Have Knee extensors that must respond to standard surface electrical stimulation procedures (stimulation frequency procedures, 30 Hz; pulse duration:1 ms and amplitude of the current of less than200 mA)
  • Be able to receive written clearance from their medical Providers to ensure safety of participants
  • Be a Veteran (male or female), however, the Department of Veteran Affairs has limited number of female Veterans, especially those with motor complete injury at level C8-T10 (currently, there are only 3 female Veterans with the target NLI in our SCI registry). Hence, inclusion of women Veterans may be challenging due to this disparity in the SCI population. If we fail to recruit 20 Veterans, we may seek an IRB approval to recruit non-Veterans to meet our target sample size
  • Have normal ECG
  • Commit to undergo 9 months of trial; 4.5 months of open-kinematic chain resistance training followed by 4.5 months of closed-kinematic chain using simple rowing approach + Vit. D supplementation (Experimental group) or 9 months of passive movement +Vit D supplementation (control group)

Exclusion Criteria:

Potential participants will be excluded if they exhibit any of the following:

  • Neurological injury other than SCI
  • Older than 65 years of age as they may likely have considerable amount of bone loss at that age
  • Have severe osteoporosis because loading porous/fragile bone by electrical stimulation may result in bone fracture
  • Those classified as AIS C & D, as they may already be engaging in weight bearing activities that may confound the results of this trial
  • Unhealed or unstable fractures in either lower or upper extremities
  • Severe scoliosis, deformities in the hip, knee, or ankles OR impaired range-of-motion, as these could be a barrier to safe positioning on the rowing machine, and on MRI or DXA tables
  • No caregiver or family member/significant other, willing to help with placing weights and positioning participants' lower extremities on the rowing machine
  • Untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) > 140 mmHg; diastolic BP > 90 mmHg), and/or sudden hypotension upon transferring from bed to wheelchair, characterized by a drop in BP by 20 mmHg (especially in persons with tetraplegia) or heart rate > 100 beats per minute
  • Anti-coagulation or anti-platelet therapy (including aspirin)
  • Implanted pacemakers, implanted defibrillator devices or any metallic implants including knee or hip implants
  • Presence of bullets in vertebral column or shrapnel anywhere in the body that may interfere with MRI procedure
  • Other medical conditions including cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled type II DM, active deep vein thrombosis (DVT), uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia, use of insulin for DM management, pressures injuries of stage 3 or higher, or active urinary tract infection
  • Severe hypercalcemia (serum calcium > 16mg/dl), stage III-V kidney disease, post-menopausal or estrogen dependent female, and men undergoing anti-androgen therapy or are post orchiectomy
  • DXA total body T-score less than -2.5. Total hip BMD T-scores < -3.5 and knee BMD scores of less than 0.6 g/cm2
  • Untreatable severe spasticity bearing on potential participants' activities of daily living, such as transfers from bed to wheelchair or maintaining position in wheelchair
  • Any psychiatric illness confounding judgment or cognitive impairment in participant or caregiver who is expected to help participant in the trial
  • Those with prosthetic lower limbs
  • Any condition that, in the judgment of the PI or other medical Providers, preclude safe participation in the study and/or has the potential to expose/increase participant's risk of infection
  • Unable to tolerate increasing either electrical stimulation current or weights to the lower legs for any reason

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NMES Plus Vitamin D
Subjects will undergo 4.5 months of open kinematic chain resistance training followed by 4.5 months of closed kinematic chain using simple rowing approach and 2000IU oral vitamin D supplementation daily for 9 months.
Subjects will undergo 4.5 months of open kinematic chain resistance training followed by 4.5 months of closed kinematic chain using simple rowing approach
Other Names:
  • Intervention
2000IU oral vitamin D supplementation daily for 9 months
Other Names:
  • Concomitant therapy
Active Comparator: Passive movement plus vitamin D
Subjects will undergo 9 months of simple passive movement exercise at home and 2000IU oral vitamin D supplementation daily for 9 months.
2000IU oral vitamin D supplementation daily for 9 months
Other Names:
  • Concomitant therapy
Subjects will perform simple passive movement exercise for their legs while sitting in their wheelchairs at their home. The frequency of the training will be twice weekly
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Trabecular Plate Width (Tb.PW) for Femur and Tibia at 4.5 Months
Time Frame: 4.5 months
The outcome measure was trabecular plate width expressed in μm, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another block of 30 starting with the proximal end of the tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 4.5 months and 9 months, respectively. Higher values indicate improved bone trabeculae.
4.5 months
Change in Trabecular Plate Width (Tb.PW) for Femur and Tibia at 9 Months
Time Frame: 9 months
The outcome measure was trabecular spacing expressed in μm, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another set of 30 slices starting with the proximal end of the tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 9 months. Higher values indicate improved Tb. PW.
9 months
Change in Trabecular Spacing (Tb.Sp) for Femur and Tibia at 4.5 Months
Time Frame: 4.5 months
The outcome measure was trabecular spacing expressed in μm, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 4.5 months and 9 months, respectively. Higher values indicate poorer bone health. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another block of 30 starting with the proximal end of the tibia.
4.5 months
Change in Trabecular Spacing (Tb.Sp) for Femur and Tibia at 9 Months
Time Frame: 9 months
The outcome measure was trabecular plate width expressed in μm, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another block of 30 beginning with the proximal end of the tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 4.5 months and 9 months, respectively. Higher values indicate improved bone trabeculae.
9 months
Change in Trabecular Network Area Density (Tb.NA) Measured in mm^2/mm^3) at 4.5 Months
Time Frame: 4.5 months
The outcome measure was trabecular network area density expressed in mm^2/mm^3, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 4.5 months and 9 months, respectively. Higher values indicate improved bone trabeculae network area density. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another block of 30 starting with the proximal end of the tibia.
4.5 months
Change in Trabecular Network Area Density (Tb.NA) as Measured by MRI at 9 Months
Time Frame: 9 months
The outcome measure was trabecular network area density expressed in mm^2/mm^3, as measured by a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the femur and tibia. The metric used was the median change from baseline to 4.5 months and 9 months, respectively. Higher values indicate improved bone trabeculae network area density. A trained radiology technician performed the MRI using a 3.0T magnet (GE Discovery MR750 software, version: DV24 System 804675VA3T; GE Waukesha, WI). A specific knee coil with a 3D fast-spin gradient echo (10 min) sequence was used to obtain high-resolution images (20-22 FOV). A bilateral phased array coil (USA Instruments) was used to collect 30 contiguous 1-mm slices in the axial plane, starting with the distal end of the femur, and another block of 30 starting with the proximal end of the tibia.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Bone Mineral Density in Distal Femur as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan
Time Frame: 4.5 months
A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan was performed by a trained technologist using a General Electric iDXA scanner (GE Lunar Inc., Madison, WI) at baseline, 4.5 months, and at 9 months. The scanner was calibrated using a phantom calibration box that mimics human tissues to assess scan precision and reliability. All participants had their jewelry removed before being placed supine on the scanning table with their arms internally rotated and palms facing medially. Participants received scans in the region of interest on both sides (L & R) of the body (hip, knee), as well as the lumbar spine.
4.5 months
Change in Distal Femur Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: 9 months
A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan was performed by a trained technologist using a General Electric iDXA scanner (GE Lunar Inc., Madison, WI) at baseline, 4.5 months, and at 9 months. The scanner was calibrated using a phantom calibration box that mimics human tissues to assess scan precision and reliability. All participants had their jewelry removed before being placed supine on the scanning table with their arms internally rotated and palms facing medially. Participants received scans in the region of interest on both sides (L & R) of the body (hip, knee), as well as the lumbar spine.
9 months
Change in Proximal Tibia Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan
Time Frame: 4.5 months
A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan was performed by a trained technologist using a General Electric iDXA scanner (GE Lunar Inc., Madison, WI) at baseline, 4.5 months, and at 9 months. The scanner was calibrated using a phantom calibration box that mimics human tissues to assess scan precision and reliability. All participants had their jewelry removed before being placed supine on the scanning table with their arms internally rotated and palms facing medially. Participants received scans in the region of interest on both sides (L & R) of the body (hip, knee), as well as the lumbar spine.
4.5 months
Change in Proximal Tibia Bone Mineral Density as Measured by a Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan
Time Frame: 9 months
A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan was performed by a trained technologist using a General Electric iDXA scanner (GE Lunar Inc., Madison, WI) at baseline, 4.5 months, and at 9 months. The scanner was calibrated using a phantom calibration box that mimics human tissues to assess scan precision and reliability. All participants had their jewelry removed before being placed supine on the scanning table with their arms internally rotated and palms facing medially. Participants received scans in the region of interest on both sides (L & R) of the body (hip, knee), as well as the lumbar spine.
9 months
Change in Bone Formation Marker - Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) in mcg/L
Time Frame: 4.5 months
Fasting blood samples were collected by venipuncture by the same individual at roughly the same time of day and under similar conditions to evaluate P1NP, a marker of bone formation. Samples were analyzed at Quest Diagnostics (Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA). The reference range for P1NP is 30-110 mcg/L, and an increase indicates poor bone health.
4.5 months
Change in Bone Formation Marker - Procollagen Type 1 Intact N-Propeptide (P1NP) Measured in mcg/L
Time Frame: 9 months
Fasting blood samples were collected by venipuncture by the same individual at roughly the same time of day and under similar conditions to evaluate P1NP, a marker of bone formation. Samples were analyzed at Quest Diagnostics (Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA). The reference range for P1NP is 30-110 mcg/L, and an increase indicates poor bone health.
9 months
Change in Bone Resorption Marker-C-telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)
Time Frame: 4.5 months
CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Fasting blood samples were collected from participants via venipuncture by the same person at approximately the same time of day and under similar conditions to measure CTX (pg/mL). The samples were analyzed by Quest Diagnostics (Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA). Sex and age-related reference ranges for males are: 18-29 years (87-1200), 30-39 years (70-780), 40-49 years (60-700), and 50-68 years (87-345). CTX is released into circulation when osteoclasts break down bone matrix; therefore, higher levels indicate increased osteoclastic activity and faster bone turnover.
4.5 months
Change in Bone Resorption Marker-C-telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)
Time Frame: 9 months
CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Fasting blood samples were collected from participants via venipuncture by the same person at approximately the same time of day and under similar conditions to measure CTX (pg/mL). The samples were analyzed by Quest Diagnostics (Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA). Sex and age-related reference ranges for males are as follows: 18-29 years (87-1200), 30-39 years (70-780), 40-49 years (60-700), and 50-68 years (87-345). CTX is released into circulation when osteoclasts break down bone matrix; therefore, higher levels indicate increased osteoclastic activity and faster bone turnover.
9 months
Change in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OD)D] Level
Time Frame: 4.5 months

25-hydroxyvitamin D is the major circulating form of vitamin D and the most reliable biochemical indicator of an individual's vitamin D status.

It is essential for maintaining bone strength, balance of minerals, and overall bone integrity. Adequate levels of 25(OH)D enhance intestinal calcium absorption for normal bone formation and remodeling. When vitamin D levels are low, calcium absorption decreases, leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism, which in turn increases bone resorption and weakens bone structure. The normal range is 32 to 100 ng/mL. Less than 20ng/mL is considered a deficiency, and 20 to 29 ng/mL is insufficiency.

4.5 months
Change in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Level
Time Frame: 9 months
25-hydroxyvitamin D is the main circulating form of vitamin D and the most reliable biochemical marker of an individual's vitamin D status. Vitamin D is crucial for maintaining bone strength, mineral balance, and overall bone health. Adequate levels of 25(OH)D improve intestinal calcium absorption, which is vital for normal bone formation and remodeling. When vitamin D levels are low, calcium absorption drops, leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism, which then increases bone resorption and weakens bone structure. The normal range is 32 to 100 ng/mL. Less than 20 ng/mL is considered a deficiency, and 20 to 29 ng/mL indicates insufficiency.
9 months
Change in Quality-of-life Measure: Physical Health (Scored on 1-5 Likert Scale)
Time Frame: 9 months
The secondary outcome measure was the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF, a 26-item self-administered questionnaire developed by WHO to assess quality of life across four domains, including two general items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = negative or low perception, 5 = positive or high perception). The instrument includes four health domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental engagement. Physical health (7 items) evaluates energy, fatigue, sleep, mobility, pain, and activities of daily living. The maximum score for this domain is 100, and a higher score indicates a better quality of life.
9 months
Change in Quality-of-life Measure- Psychological Health
Time Frame: 9 months
The WHOQOL-BREF instrument was used to assess QOL in four domains of health, including: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental engagement. The mean scores of items within each domain were used to calculate domain scores, which were then transformed using the WHOQOL-BREF scoring manual to make the domain scores comparable to those used in the WHOQOL-100. Items 3, 4, and 26 were reverse-coded per the instruction manual. Psychological health (6 items) measures self-esteem, body image, negative and positive feelings, and concentration. A higher score denotes higher psychological health.
9 months
Change in Quality-of-life Measure- Social Relationships Domain
Time Frame: 9 months
The WHOQOL-BREF instrument was used to assess QOL in four domains of health, including: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The mean scores of items within each domain were used to calculate domain scores, which were then transformed using the WHOQOL-BREF scoring manual to make the domain scores comparable to those used in the WHOQOL-100. Items 3, 4, and 26 were reverse-coded per the instruction manual. Social relationships (3 items) assess personal relationships, social support, and sexual life. A higher score denotes a higher social relationships.
9 months
Change in Quality-of-life Measure-environmental Engagement Domain
Time Frame: 9 months
The WHOQOL-BREF instrument was used to assess QOL in four domains of health participants, including: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental engagement. The mean scores of items within each domain were used to calculate domain scores, which were then transformed using the WHOQOL-BREF scoring manual to make the domain scores comparable to those used in the WHOQOL-100. Items 3, 4, and 26 were reverse-coded per the instruction manual. Environmental engagement (8 items) assesses financial resources, safety, home environment, health care access, and opportunities for recreation and learning. A Higher score denotes better environmental engagement.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dora E Ifon, PhD, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on NMES

Subscribe