TVMR With the Innovalve System Trial - Pilot Study in Italy (TWIST-PILOT-IT)

June 23, 2025 updated by: Edwards Lifesciences
Study to evaluate the safety and performance of the Innovalve mitral valve replacement system

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant, symptomatic mitral regurgitation
  • High risk for open-heart surgery
  • Meets anatomical criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuitable anatomy
  • Patient is inoperable
  • EF <30%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MV replacement with Innovalve MR system
Innovalve TMVR system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absence of implant or delivery related serious adverse events at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
Absence of implant or delivery related serious adverse events at 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success
Time Frame: Procedure
All of the following must be present: i. Absence of procedural mortality; and ii. Successful access, delivery, and retrieval of the device delivery system; and iii. Successful deployment and correct positioning of the first intended device; and iv. Freedom from emergency surgery or reintervention related to the device or access procedure.
Procedure
Procedural Success
Time Frame: 30 days

All of the following must be present:

I. Deployment of the device

II. Absence of major device- or procedure-related SAEs, including:

  1. Death
  2. Stroke
  3. Life-threatening bleeding (Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium [MVARC] definition)
  4. Major vascular complications requiring surgery to repair
  5. Major cardiac structural complications requiring surgery to repair
  6. Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (including new dialysis)
  7. Myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  8. Unexpected cardiogenic shock requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular (LV) or biventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for > 48 hours.
  9. Any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention
30 days
Device Success
Time Frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years

All of the following must be present:

  1. Absence of procedural mortality or stroke; and
  2. Proper placement and positioning of the device; and
  3. Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; and
  4. Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
  5. No evidence of major structural or functional failure
  6. No specific, major device-related technical failure issues and complications
  7. Reduction of MR to either optimal or acceptable levels* without significant mitral stenosis (i.e., post-procedure effective orifice area [EROA] ≥ 1.5 cm2 with transmitral mean gradient < 5 mmHg), no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular leak (PVL), and no hemolysis
30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Patient Success
Time Frame: 1 year

All of the following must be present:

  1. Deployment of the device
  2. Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting; and
  3. No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition (e.g., MR, heart failure); and
  4. Improvement from baseline in symptoms (e.g., New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class improvement by ≥ 1 class); and
  5. Improvement from baseline in functional status (e.g., 6-minute walk test/distance [6MWT/D] improvement by ≥ 50 m); and
  6. Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life (e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ-12] improvement by ≥ 10 points)
1 year
Increase in 6MWD
Time Frame: from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Reduction in MR grade
Time Frame: from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Atrial septal defects requiring closure
Time Frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Change in NYHA Class
Time Frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of heart failure is based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from Class I-IV. Class I = no limitations of physical activity; Class II = slight limitations of physical activity, ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath; Class III = marked limitations of physical activity, less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or shortness of breath; Class IV = unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort, symptoms of heart failure at rest.
30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Quality of life change (KCCQ-12)
Time Frame: from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function, and quality of life domains. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
from baseline to 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa)
Time Frame: Discharge and 30 days
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a 30-point test assessing multiple cognitive domains, including short-term memory recall, visuospatial abilities, executive function, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. Scores are on a 30-point scale; scores 26 and above indicate normal cognitive function. Lower scores may indicate mild cognitive impairment (scores 19-25), moderate impairment (scores 10-18), or severe impairment (scores less than 10).
Discharge and 30 days
Composite of MVARC criteria
Time Frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years

Number of patients who experience composite endpoint events: death due to any cause, repeat hospitalization due to heart failure, disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, life-threatening major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or specific device-related major technical failure issues and complications.

b. Repeat hospitalization for heart failure c. Disabling stroke d. Myocardial infarction e. Life-threatening major bleeding f. Acute kidney injury g. Specific device-related major technical failure issues and complications

30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Colombo, Prof, Humanitas IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 4, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INVL20-01-IT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Regurgitation (Degenerative or Functional)

Clinical Trials on Innovalve TMVR system

Subscribe