Optimizing Parameters of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cortical Modulation in Stroke Patients (LIFU)

July 16, 2026 updated by: Duke University
The purpose of this research study is to find out the optimal intensity and frequency of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) that is safe and tolerable in people who have had a stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1 is to determine the optimal intensity of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients in terms of safety. We will investigate the optimal spatial-peak temporal-average intensity/ISPTA in the range of 0(or sham) W/cm2 to 8 W/cm2. Safety will be investigated by assessing clinically detectable signs and symptoms by monitoring vital signs and surveying subjects with a questionnaire before and after each stimulation session, and additionally by detecting subclinical neuronal injury using MRI/DWI. Aim 1 requires up to 36 subjects.

Aim 2 is to determine the optimal frequency of LIFU stimulation in stroke patients in terms of cortical excitability. Stroke subjects undergo each of the 5 frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz) on 5 different days with at least one day washout. The intensity (ISPTA) will set up at the level that is determined from Aim 1. Cortical excitability is measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) from the Abductor Pollicis Brevis (ABP) muscle of the affected side. MEPs will be recorded pre- and post-stimulation to determine the optimal intensity for maximal cortical excitability from the hemisphere where the lesion is located. Aim 2 requires 18 subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 21 years old of any gender and race;
  2. Clinical ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic (confirmed by CT or MRI) that occurred >= 2 months ago
  3. Predominantly unilateral motor impairment with FM-UE score ≤ 62/66;
  4. MEPs are inducible from a hand muscle on the affected side (i.e. Abductor Pollicis Brevis (APB) muscle).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any concomitant neurological disorder affecting arm function;
  2. Documented history of severe dementia with or without medication before stroke;
  3. Subject is unable to do the motor learning practice at the baseline;
  4. Presence of any MRI/TMS/ultrasonic stimulation risk factors: an electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips, or any other electrically sensitive support system; non-fixed metal in any part of the body; pregnancy (the effect of TMS/ultrasonic stimulation on the fetus is unknown); no history of seizure before or after the stroke; preexisting scalp lesion or wound or bone defect or hemicraniectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation
There are different combinations of intensity and frequency with LIFUS
Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation in a sequence of increasing intensity (sham, 1 W/CM2, 2 W/CM2, 4 W/CM2, 6 W/CM2, 8 W/CM2)
Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation of intensity level determined from intervention 1 at progressively increasing frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcomes as Measured by the Number of Participants With a "Major Response"
Time Frame: At any point during or immediately following intervention on day of LIFUS application
A "major response" is pre-defined as having any of the following events: Second degree scalp burn; Clinical seizure; New lesion on DWI sequence of MRI scan and the lesion not explained by any other cause(s) or decreased ADC under the transducer stimulating motor cortex area; Patient discontinues from the study due to any reason.
At any point during or immediately following intervention on day of LIFUS application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortical Excitability as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Improved by ≥ 20% on Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude
Time Frame: Immediately after ultrasonic stimulation
Cortical excitability is measured by Motor evoked potential(MEP) amplitude using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. The median amplitude of all MEPs was calculated and used as the measure of the corticospinal excitability. The percentage change in MEP (post-pre) was calculated and the number of participants who improved by ≥20 % on MEP amplitude is reported.
Immediately after ultrasonic stimulation
Motor Sequence Learning (MSL) as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Improved by ≥ 20% on a MSL Task
Time Frame: Immediately after ultrasonic stimulation
MSL improvements is quantified by calculating the percentage change in the median response time (post-pre) and the number of participants who improved by ≥20 % on MSL is reported.
Immediately after ultrasonic stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wayne Feng, Duke Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

we will follow the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association data sharing policy per grant requirement

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe