Effectiveness and Safety of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Using Rac'z Catheter Versus Navi Catheter in Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

February 2, 2025 updated by: Saeid Metwaly Abouelyazid Elsawy, Assiut University
In the past decade, spine surgery rates have dramatically increased in parallel to those of other procedural interventions. Persistent pain is a common occurrence after spine surgery, with the most commonly quoted prevalence rates ranging from 10% to 40%. This pain can be classified into failure to alleviate baseline pain, pain resulting from complications (e.g., arachnoiditis and epidural adhesions), and pain that ensues several years later as a sequele to alterations in spinal architecture and biomechanics (e.g., adjacent segment discogenic or facetogenic pain) which is called failed back surgery syndrome ( FBSS )

Study Overview

Detailed Description

By observing adhesions directly, the lysis of scar tissue can be carried out mechanically using some percutaneous techniques as insertion of catheters as Rac'z catheter (thin in calibre) which will be inserted through the skin under fluoroscopy guidance or using NAVI catheter (large in calibre) either fluoroscopy guided or using thin epiduroscopy. Adhesions can be disintegrated and their evaluation scores may improve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • Saeid Metwaly Elsawy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of lumbar surgery of at least 6 months duration in the past.
  • Patients over the 18 years of age.
  • History of persistent function-limiting lower extremity pain aggravated by "dural tug" (observed when the patient, sitting on the exam table with legs stretched out, bends forward, bringing on the back pain) with or without low back pain of at least 6 months duration after failure of conventional conservative management in most patients including NSAIDS, muscle relaxants (tizanidine, magnesium sulphate) and pregabalin.
  • Patients who are competent to understand the study protocol and provide voluntary, written informed consent and participate in outcome measurements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable or heavy opioid use.
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric disorders.
  • Uncontrolled medical illness.
  • Any conditions that could interfere with the interpretation of the outcome assessments.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with a history or potential for adverse reaction(s) to local anaesthetics or steroid.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Raj'z catheter
adhesiolysis in failed back surgery
Active Comparator: NAVI catheter
adhesiolysis in failed back surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numerical rating scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The VAS score was used that has 0-10 points. The 0 point represents the painless state and a score from 1 to 3 points represents mild pain, from 4 to 6 points represents moderate pain and from 7 to 10 points represents severe pain.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 12 month
0 - 100% disability; minimal disability = 0% to either bed-bound or exaggerating symptoms = 100%)
12 month
pregabalin consumption
Time Frame: 12 month
amount of pregabalin consumed by the patient per day
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

may i share it

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Racz adhesolysis

Subscribe