- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05022355
Examination of Operative Approach in pwFSHD (Patient With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy)
The Comparison of the Effects of Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis Surgery Versus Usual Care on Balance and Gait Parameters in Patients With Fascioscapulohumeral Dystrophy: One-Blind Study
Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common forms of muscular dystrophy, characterized by pronounced skeletal novelistic weakness and with a broad spectrum of diseases. It is a hereditary disease seen in 3-5/100,000 of society, usually starting with weakness in the facial and shoulder muscles and progressing to the trunk, pelvis and leg muscles, giving symptoms in the twenties. In FSHD, which shows slow progression and can lead to loss of ambulation ability in about 20% of patients, patients may have difficulty performing activities above shoulder level with the influence of the periscapular area.
Skeletal muscle weakness leads to posture and balance disorders, and postural instability is a common problem in patients with FSHD. Weakness of the trunk and lower limb muscles found in more than half of patients causes problems with postural balance and walking. The calf, iliopsoas, and gluteus maximus muscles together form the main determinants of walking speed in healthy people, where kalf muscles are known to contribute the most. Individuals with FSHD have been reported to have decreased speed, step length, and step frequency compared to healthy controls. Impaired upper body control can compromise the maintenance of dynamic stability. In patient with FSHD the effects of muscle tone, motor coordination, loss of joint range of motion and muscle weakness on posture, balance control and gait are observed more clearly.
The aim of the study was to compare the effects of scapular management treatments on balance and gait in FSHD patients.
H0: There is no difference in balance and walking parameters of patients with FSHD who have had scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery and have not undergone surgery.
H1: There is a difference in balance and walking parameters of patients with FSHD who have had scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery and have not undergone surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34500
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-65 years
- Score between 0,5 and 3,5 according to CSS (clinical severity rating)
- Score between 3 and 5 according to FAS (functional ambulation scale)
- Being included in the surgical group the patient has undergone unilateral or bilateral scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of lower extremity orthopedic problems/problems that can cause balance and walking problems
- Presence of any other upper limb orthopedic problems/problems and surgery
- Having undergone Spinal fusion surgery
- Presence of additional neurological problems/problems
- Having a level of visual and auditory problems that will prevent communication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
scapulothoracic arthrodesis
Individuals diagnosed with FSHD who have undergone unilateral or bilateral surgery who meet the inclusion criteria. application of determined outcome scales on patients |
|
non-operative
Participants diagnosed with FSHD who have not undergone any surgery, who meet the inclusion criteria. application of determined outcome scales on patients |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10 meter walking test
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
during the test, the patient is asked to walk at a normal walking speed at a distance of 10 meters determined before the test.
The time it has traveled the specified distance is recorded.
It is a long-term performance test used for dynamic balance assessment.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
Gait Analyzer
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time.
It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.
|
once at baseline of study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
It is a scale containing 14 instructions and a score of 0-4 is given by observing the patient's performance for each instruction.
0 points are given in cases where the patient cannot perform the activity at all, while 4 points are given when the patient completes the activity independently.
The highest score is 56 and 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate an acceptable balance, 41-56 points indicate the presence of a good balance.
It takes between 10 and 20 minutes to complete the scale.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH)
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
It is a 30-item questionnaire that examines the patient's ability to perform certain upper limb activities.
This survey is a self-report questionnaire in which patients can assess difficulty and intervention in daily life on a Likert scale of 5 points.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
30 seconds sit up test
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
It is a test that evaluates the patient's sit-up activity, lower limb strength and dynamic balance.
A 30-second period is initiated when the patient cuts the contact of his pelvis from the chair in which he is sitting.
He is constantly asked to sit on the chair and get up from there within 30 seconds.
It is scored by counting how many repetitions the patient applies this command within 30 seconds.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
2-minute walk test
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
it is recommended that the area where the test will be performed should be a corridor with a length of 30 meters, a flat and hard floor.
It is necessary to determine the starting and ending points of the field to be tested.
The patient is asked to walk the maximum distance he can walk within 2 minutes by standing at the starting point.
When it expires, the distance it travels is recorded.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
Single leg stance test
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
It is used to evaluate static posture and balance control.
The patient must stand unaided on one leg from the moment the other foot leaves the ground until the foot touches the ground again or the arms are separated from the hips.
|
once at baseline of study
|
|
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: once at baseline of study
|
The Test is a measure of dynamic equilibrium.
It requires individuals to get up from a chair, walk 3 feet, turn and sit.
The time from the moment the individual lifts the pelvis from the chair until he or she returns with the pelvis in the chair is recorded in seconds.
|
once at baseline of study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ipek Yeldan, PhD, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Statland JM, Tawil R. Risk of functional impairment in Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Apr;49(4):520-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.23949. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
- Fecek C, Emmady PD. Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy. 2022 Jun 27. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559028/
- Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Clinical Functional Capacity Testing in Patients With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Construct Validity and Interrater Reliability of Antigravity Tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.429. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
- Tawil R, Van Der Maarel SM. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jul;34(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/mus.20522.
- Kang PB, Morrison L, Iannaccone ST, Graham RJ, Bonnemann CG, Rutkowski A, Hornyak J, Wang CH, North K, Oskoui M, Getchius TS, Cox JA, Hagen EE, Gronseth G, Griggs RC; Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: evaluation, diagnosis, and management of congenital muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Mar 31;84(13):1369-78. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001416.
- Tawil R, Kissel JT, Heatwole C, Pandya S, Gronseth G, Benatar M; Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: Evaluation, diagnosis, and management of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Jul 28;85(4):357-64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001783.
- Kord D, Liu E, Horner NS, Athwal GS, Khan M, Alolabi B. Outcomes of scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Apr;12(2):75-90. doi: 10.1177/1758573219866195. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
- Iosa M, Mazza C, Pecoraro F, Aprile I, Ricci E, Cappozzo A. Control of the upper body movements during level walking in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Gait Posture. 2010 Jan;31(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.247. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
- Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, de Rooy JW, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Gait propulsion in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and ankle plantarflexor weakness. Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
- Bayram S, Kendirci AS, Karalar S, Durmus Tekce H, Parman FY, Akgul T, Durmaz H. Correlations between radiographic spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality of life: A prospective evaluation of 37 patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106137. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106137. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
- Padua L, Aprile I, Frusciante R, Iannaccone E, Rossi M, Renna R, Messina S, Frasca G, Ricci E. Quality of life and pain in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Aug;40(2):200-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.21308.
- Le Hanneur M, Saint-Cast Y. Long-term results of Letournel scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study of eight cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 May;103(3):421-425. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
- Rijken NH, van der Kooi EL, Hendriks JC, van Asseldonk RJ, Padberg GW, Geurts AC, van Engelen BG. Skeletal muscle imaging in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, pattern and asymmetry of individual muscle involvement. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Dec;24(12):1087-96. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
- Aprile I, Padua L, Iosa M, Gilardi A, Bordieri C, Frusciante R, Russo G, Erra C, De Santis F, Ricci E. Balance and walking in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: multiperspective assessment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;48(3):393-402. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 38981562-900-
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy
-
Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteCompletedFacio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy | FSHD2 | FSHD1Australia
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalTerminated
-
Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsRecruitingFacio-Scapulo-Humeral DystrophyThailand, Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedFacio-Scapulo-Humeral DystrophyFrance
-
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaRecruitingMuscular Dystrophies | Becker Muscular Dystrophy | Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral DystrophyItaly
-
University of LiverpoolBournemouth University; Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District... and other collaboratorsRecruitingNeuromuscular Diseases | Shoulder Injuries | Shoulder Pain | Upper Extremity Problem | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral DystrophyUnited Kingdom
-
Avidity Biosciences, Inc.RecruitingFacioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy | FSHD | Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 (FSHD1) | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy | FSHD - Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy | Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1 | FSHD2 | FSHD1 | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy | Fascioscapulohumeral... and other conditionsUnited States, Denmark, Spain, Canada, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Japan, Netherlands
-
Avidity Biosciences, Inc.Active, not recruitingMuscular Dystrophies | Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral | FSHD | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy | FMD | Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1 | FSHD2 | FSHD1 | FMD2 | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy... and other conditionsUnited States, Canada, United Kingdom
-
Avidity Biosciences, Inc.CompletedMuscular Dystrophies | Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral | FSHD | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy | FMD | Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1 | FSHD2 | FSHD1 | FMD2 | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 | Fascioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy... and other conditionsUnited States, Canada, United Kingdom
-
LMU KlinikumEnrolling by invitationFriedreich Ataxia | Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy | Inclusion Body Myositis | Myotonic Dystrophy 1 | Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophies | Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy | Myasthaenia Gravis | Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) | Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathies | Guillain Barré Syndrome and other conditionsGermany