Comparison of Detection of SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) Between Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens and Those Obtained by Salivary Sputum (COVISAL)

August 26, 2021 updated by: Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne

Comparison of the Results, Feasibility and Acceptability of Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV2 Between Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Recovered in Virological Transport Medium and Those Obtained by Salivary Sputum

Multicenter observational study of diagnostic test validation (Research Involving the Human Person, type 3) In addition to the diagnosis by the reference method (nasopharyngeal swab), the patient will be asked to provide a saliva sample via a salivary spit. The clinical circumstances of the diagnosis, the age of the patient, the associated terrain (diabetes, immunodepression, pregnancy) will be noted. The nasopharyngeal and saliva samples will be analyzed in Cayenne and the remaining samples will be frozen and stored at the CRB before being sent to the University Hospital of Caen for analysis and concordance verification.

The expected benefits are:

Possibility of repeating tests in the same person more easily due to the absence of pain and thus reduce the barriers to diagnosis and screening.

Possibility of self-sampling, which could simply be sent to the laboratory, which would relieve the diagnostic sites that mobilize staff and require a fairly heavy organization. Avoid long waiting lines that can be an obstacle and lead to a renunciation of the diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1159

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cayenne, French Guiana, 97306
        • General Hospital of Cayenne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with an indication to perform a COVID diagnostic test (symptomatology, contact case, systematic screening etc...)
  • Men and women at least 3 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient or his legal representative,
  • Taking treatments that reduce salivary volume (anticholinergic activity)
  • Impossibility to perform the nasopharyngeal test
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship, persons placed under protective measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient with an indication for a COVID19 test
The persons included will be those who have an indication for a COVID 19 test and who present themselves at the Cayenne hospital and during the screening missions organised by the Red Cross and Médecin du Monde during the COVID 19 epidemic in the territory

Results of nasopharyngeal and salivary samples taken at the Cayenne hospital and the Caen university center,

  • Pre-analytical particularities and analytical particularities
  • Cycle threeshold
  • Demographic variables
  • Clinical variables
  • Clinical criteria
  • Questionnaire on the perception of the 2 sampling methods

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity of salivary test vs. nasopharyngeal test
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
- Proportion of analyses not performed on salivary samples for the following reasons (vs. number of salivary sample analyses performed): o Insufficient quantity of biological sample, o Inability to collect the sample
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Perception of the tests by questionnaire (proportion of positive opinions)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Perception of the tests by questionnaire (proportion of negative opinions)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Positivity and negativity of the salivary test vs. symptomatology and associated terrain
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Sensitivity and specificity analysis between the salivary test and the nasopharyngeal test according to the clinical context
Time Frame: 1 day
Sensitivity and specificity analysis between the salivary test and the nasopharyngeal test according to the time between the samples and the onset of symptoms, the time between the samples and the contact with an index case, the known immunodepression and the clinical context (diabetes, pregnancy)
1 day
Description of the aspect of the saliva collected: mucous or fluid
Time Frame: 1 day
Description of the analytical criteria of the saliva sample
1 day
Volume of saliva collected (mL)
Time Frame: 1 day
Description of the analytical criteria of the saliva sample: (pipette measurement, if the saliva is not fluid, pipette measurement after vortexing for 1 min)
1 day
Description of the analytical criteria of the saliva sample:pre-analytical treatments if necessary
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Number of Cycle threeshold for the first analysis (done at the Cayenne hospital) and the second analysis (done at the university hospital of Caen)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
- Sensitivity of salivary test vs nasopharyngeal test with strong positives (3 genes detected)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
- Specificity of salivary test vs nasopharyngeal test with strong positives (3 genes detected)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
- Sensitivity of salivary test vs nasopharyngeal test with weak positives (1 gene detected)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
- Specificity of salivary test vs nasopharyngeal test with weak positives (1 gene detected)
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 12, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Salivary test for COVID19

Subscribe