- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05031962
Safety and Clinical Performance of a Biological Matrix Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (PADM)-Assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: a Prospective Observational Study
The general objective of the study is to confirm the medium/long-term safety and clinical performance of the CELLIS Breast membranes used in breast reconstruction and to identify emerging risks in comparison to clinical data related to other treatment modalities.
The present study will be a prospective, multicentric, non-randomized and non-controlled trial involving 112 patients followed for 24 months. The study will be conducted in France in 7 investigational centres.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will be prospective, multicentric, single-arm observational (non-interventional) to evaluate the safety and performance of the CELLIS Breast membranes used in breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
All evaluations will be performed and products used according to the usual practice, without additional or unusual diagnostic, treatment and monitoring procedure.
The study will be conducted in France in 7 investigational centres including 112 patients scheduled for a breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
Each patient will participate in one assessment period including a preoperative visit, followed by the day of surgical procedure and a hospitalization period.
Patients will return for ambulatory visits on day 10 (+/- 5 days) and/or on day 30 (+/- 7 days), on month 3 (+/- 2 weeks), on month 12 (+/- 2 weeks) and on month 24 (+/-2 weeks) post-surgery.
CELLIS Breast is available in one thickness, in a variety of size and forms addressing multiple surgical techniques.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
- Institut Bergonié
-
Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92100
- Hôpital Ambroise Paré
-
Colmar, France, 68024
- Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar
-
Lille, France, 59000
- Centre Oscar Lambret
-
Lyon, France, 69373
- Centre léon bérard
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
-
Paris, France, 75020
- Hopital Tenon
-
Saint-Herblain, France, 44 805
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site René Gauducheau
-
Toulouse, France, 31059
- IUCT Oncopole
-
Villejuif, France, 94800
- lnstitut Gustave Roussy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient aged ≥18 years,
- Patient with an indication of breast reconstruction after mastectomy (therapeutic or prophylactic),
- Patient being informed of her participation to the study and of the follow-up visits, and having no objection to the clinical data collection and medical file access,
- Patient being informed of the porcine origin of the device in advance of the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with known hypersensitivity to porcine materials,
- Patient with an existing infection at the site of implantation,
- Patient having refused to participate to the study,
- Patient refusing to return for the follow-up visits,
- Patient who is pregnant.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
CELLIS Breast (Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix, PADM)
Implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy using the CELLIS Breast matrix
|
Biological membrane used in breast reconstruction
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of adverse events. Main complications of interest: infection, cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, skin flap-nipple necrosis, delayed wound healing, wound dehiscence, red breast syndrome, capsular contracture, implant related
Time Frame: From the surgical procedure throughout the entire 24-month follow-up period
|
Percentage
|
From the surgical procedure throughout the entire 24-month follow-up period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient aesthetic evaluation evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The suppleness of the reconstruction will be evaluated (natural-hard): VAS score from 1 to 10 (1=very bad suppleness, breast hard; 10=excellent suppleness-natural breast).
Time Frame: At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
|
Described at each visit
|
At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
|
|
Surgeon aesthetic evaluation: satisfaction related to the quality of the reconstruction (very good, good, fair, bad), suppleness (Visual Analog Scale score from 1 to 10 with 10=excellent suppleness) and symmetry (very good, good, fair, bad).
Time Frame: At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
|
Percentage of each modality and VAS score described at each visit
|
At the 3, 12 and 24-month follow-up visits
|
|
Patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) scored from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=worse pain).
Time Frame: At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
|
Described at each visit
|
At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
|
|
Patient analgesics consumption
Time Frame: At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
|
Percentage of analgesics consumption with a Cochrane-Armitage trend test.
|
At the 10-day, 30-day, 3-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-up visits
|
|
Quality of life (QoL) by the use of the SF-36 questionnaire.
Time Frame: At baseline and at 24 month
|
Change from screening of each domain score and total score at 24-month.
The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section.
Scores range from 0 - 100 with lower scores = more disability, and higher scores = less disability
|
At baseline and at 24 month
|
|
Description of device deficiency: inadequacy of a medical device with respects to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance. Device deficiencies include malfunctions, use errors, and inadequate labelling.
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
Summarized and listed
|
During the surgical procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael ATLAN, MD, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- BR_01_CIP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawnBreast Reconstruction Following MastectomyUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedBreast Reconstruction Following MastectomyUnited States
-
GC AestheticsRecruitingBreast Augmentation | Breast Reconstruction | Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy | Breast Reconstruction Surgery | Breast Implants | Breast Revision | Breast Reconstruction With Silicone Implants | Breast Reconstruction After MastectomyUnited Kingdom
-
AlloSourceActive, not recruitingPre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction Following MastectomyUnited States
-
AlloSourceRecruitingPre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Single or Double MastectomyUnited States
-
Laboratoires BIOTIC PhoceaClinical Research Consultants, Inc.RecruitingReconstruction of the Nipple-areola Complex in Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstructive Surgery Following MastectomyFrance
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingBreast Reconstruction | Mastectomy | Postmastectomy Pain | Mastectomy Patient | Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction | Breast Reconstruction After MastectomyUnited States
-
Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationCompletedBreast Reconstruction | MastectomyUnited States
-
West China HospitalNot yet recruitingBreast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruitingBreast Reconstruction After MastectomyUnited States
Clinical Trials on CELLIS Breast (Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix, PADM)
-
Meccellis BiotechActive, not recruitingAbdominal Hernia | Abdominal Wall Defect | Abdominal Wall InjuryFrance
-
Meccellis BiotechCompleted
-
Meccellis BiotechActive, not recruitingDental SurgeryFrance
-
Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationWashington University School of Medicine; Pines Surgical; Meridian Healthcare...CompletedHernia of Abdominal WallUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterThe Plastic Surgery FoundationActive, not recruiting
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedGingival RecessionBrazil
-
University Hospital BratislavaComenius UniversityCompleted
-
Seoul St. Mary's HospitalNot yet recruitingBreast Neoplasms | Mastectomy, SegmentalSouth Korea
-
European Institute of OncologyCompletedBreast Cancer | Breast Implant Infection | Breast Implant; Complications | Implant Capsular Contracture | Breast Implant Protrusion | Breast SeromaItaly
-
Aarhus University HospitalCompletedSurgiMend® vs. Strattice™ in Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction- A Prospective Randomized TrialBreast NeoplasmsDenmark