Parenting Stress mHealth

January 9, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Reducing Parenting Stress to Facilitate Justice-Involved Youth's Treatment

Parenting stress is a well-documented barrier to youth engagement in community-based substance use treatment. The current project aims to develop and evaluate a mobile health parenting stress intervention for caregivers of justice-involved youth, a population with high rates of substance use and low rates of treatment engagement.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Justice-involved youth exhibit high rates of substance use and mental health symptoms, yet few receive treatment during detention or community re-entry. Once released into the community, caregivers must facilitate youth's treatment engagement, mobilizing significant resources and facing many barriers (e.g., transportation, mistrust) to do so. Parenting stress, which is heightened during youth detention and community reentry, is associated with greater perceived barriers to treatment, less youth therapeutic change throughout treatment, and premature treatment dropout. Addressing parenting stress improves youth treatment engagement and outcomes among youth exhibiting antisocial behavior, yet given the many barriers to treatment, novel approaches to intervention are needed; mobile health (mHealth) technology is one promising approach. Caregivers of justice-involved youth and system stakeholders are interested in mHealth treatment and mHealth addresses instrumental barriers (e.g., transportation) to treatment. Advances in technology and community engaged research allow for active stakeholder collaboration in mHealth application development, with no technological expertise required, through participatory informatics; caregiver involvement increases the likelihood the intervention will be relevant and efficacious. The purpose of this mixed-methods K23 study is to 1) develop a mHealth parenting stress intervention using participatory informatics; 2) assess the feasibility and acceptability of the participatory informatics approach and the intervention; 3) evaluate the intervention's preliminary efficacy in reducing parenting stress and increasing youth engagement in substance use or dual diagnosis treatment post-detention through a pilot randomized controlled trial; and 4) understand systems-level factors that could influence eventual system adoption and sustainability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94131
        • Recruiting
        • UCSF Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The following is a description for the inclusion criteria for aims 1 and 2 for caregivers participating in this research study.

Eligible caregivers must be the parent or legal guardian of a youth who is:

  • currently detained in a juvenile detention center or correctional facility, mandated by the juvenile justice system to a congregate out-of-home placement (e.g., group home);
  • 12-17 years old;
  • has an identified substance use or substance use and co-occurring mental health need;
  • and is scheduled to be released into the community to the care of the enrolled caregiver.

The following is a description for the inclusion criteria for aim 3 for system stakeholders participating in this research study.

Eligible behavioral health providers (e.g., substance use counselor) must:

  • Provide substance use or dual diagnosis treatment justice-involved youth and their caregivers,
  • be over 18 years old,
  • and speak English fluently.

Eligible juvenile probation officers must be:

  • 18 years or older
  • and speak fluent English.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for all participants includes:

  • lack of proficiency in English
  • and cognitive impairment or active psychosis which precludes provision of informed consent.

Caregivers who do not have access to a device with internet access will also not be eligible as this would preclude them from being able to participate in the mHealth intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mHealth parenting stress app
mHealth parenting stress app intervention to reduce parenting stress and improving youth community-based treatment engagement.
mHealth parenting stress app intervention to reduce parenting stress and improving youth community-based treatment engagement.
No Intervention: Standard of care
Caregiver participants will receive an informational brochure describing ways to support one's adolescent during detention and community reentry and any other usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Mindful Parenting)
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
The Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale is an 8-item self-report of mindful parenting, including four sub-scales reflecting present-centered emotional awareness in parenting, present-centered attention in parenting, non-reactivity/low reactivity in parenting, and non-judgmental acceptance in parenting that will be used to measure mindful parenting as a construct. Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 scale and items are summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=8 to 40); higher scores indicate greater mindful parenting.
3 months post baseline
Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Mindful Parenting)
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
The Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale is an 8-item self-report of mindful parenting, including four sub-scales reflecting present-centered emotional awareness in parenting, present-centered attention in parenting, non-reactivity/low reactivity in parenting, and non-judgmental acceptance in parenting that will be used to measure mindful parenting as a construct. Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 scale and items are summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=8 to 40); higher scores indicate greater mindful parenting.
6 months post baseline
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (Parenting Stress)
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
The Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) is a 90-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and summed to create sub-scale scores; higher scores reflect greater parenting stress.
3 months post baseline
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (Parenting Stress)
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
The Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) is a 90-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=90 to 450); higher scores reflect greater parenting stress.
6 months post baseline
Parenting Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) is a 20-item assessment of caregivers' perceived parenting ability across 3 dimensions: parental connection, behavioral influence, and psychological autonomy and used to measure parenting self-efficacy. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 10 (possible range=0 to 200) with higher scores reflecting greater parenting self-efficacy.
3 months post baseline
Parenting Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) is a 20-item assessment of caregivers' perceived parenting ability across 3 dimensions: parental connection, behavioral influence, and psychological autonomy and used to measure parenting self-efficacy. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 10 (possible range=0 to 200) with higher scores reflecting greater parenting self-efficacy.
6 months post baseline
Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (Barriers to Youth Treatment)
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the use of behavioral health services by children ages 8 years to 17 years. The CASA includes 31 settings covering inpatient, outpatient, and informal services provided by a variety of child-serving providers and sectors. This instrument collects information on whether a service was ever used, as well as more detailed information (length of stay/number of visits, focus of treatment) on services used in the recent past. Select items from the CASA will assess 16 barriers to youths' services use (e.g., language, transportation, cost, stigma). Caregivers will report whether each barrier was a concern during the 3 months prior to the youths' detention or for follow-ups, in the 3 months since the last assessment (6 months post baseline).
3 months post baseline
Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (Barriers to Youth Treatment)
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the use of behavioral health services by children ages 8 years to 17 years. The CASA includes 31 settings covering inpatient, outpatient, and informal services provided by a variety of child-serving providers and sectors. This instrument collects information on whether a service was ever used, as well as more detailed information (length of stay/number of visits, focus of treatment) on services used in the recent past. Select items from the CASA will assess 16 barriers to youths' services use (e.g., language, transportation, cost, stigma). Caregivers will report whether each barrier was a concern during the 3 months prior to the youths' detention or for follow-ups, in the 3 months since the last assessment (6 months post baseline).
6 months post baseline
Motivation for Youth Treatment
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS) is an 8-item measure of intrinsic motivation for youth treatment and assesses a youth and caregiver's problem recognition and treatment readiness. Responses are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and are summed to yield two sub-scale scores (problem recognition: possible range=3 to 15; treatment readiness: possible range=5 to 25). Higher scores reflect higher motivation.
3 months post baseline
Motivation for Youth Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS) is an 8-item measure of intrinsic motivation for youth treatment and assesses a youth and caregiver's problem recognition and treatment readiness. Responses are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and are summed to yield two sub-scale scores (problem recognition: possible range=3 to 15; treatment readiness: possible range=5 to 25). Higher scores reflect higher motivation.
6 months post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Youth Treatment Engagement
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
Caregiver report on whether youth initiated substance use, mental health, dual diagnosis, or family based treatment in the community (i.e., scheduled appointment, attended first appointment), treatment retention (i.e., number of sessions attended) is collected to measure youth treatment engagement. Caregiver report will also provide information on whether the youth complied with treatment mandated by the juvenile court (e.g., probation requirement).
3 months post baseline
Youth Treatment Engagement
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
Caregiver report on whether youth initiated substance use, mental health, dual diagnosis, or family based treatment in the community (i.e., scheduled appointment, attended first appointment), treatment retention (i.e., number of sessions attended) is collected to measure youth treatment engagement. Caregiver report will also provide information on whether the youth complied with treatment mandated by the juvenile court (e.g., probation requirement).
6 months post baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caregiver Mental Health & Substance Use
Time Frame: 6 months post baseline
DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory is a 23-item self-report assessment of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mania, psychosis) and substance use during the past 2 weeks; 1 item regarding suicidal ideation was removed. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 4 (possible range=0 to 88). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
6 months post baseline
mHealth Application Acceptability
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
Completed by the intervention condition only, the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire for Standalone mHealth Apps is a 21-item self-report assessment of the acceptability (i.e., ease of use, interface and satisfaction, usefulness) of the mHealth application. Items are rated on a scale from 1 to 4 (possible range=21 to 84). Higher scores reflect greater acceptability of the mobile health app intervention.
3 months post baseline
Caregiver Mental Health & Substance Use
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory is a 23-item self-report assessment of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mania, psychosis) and substance use during the past 2 weeks; 1 item regarding suicidal ideation was removed. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 4 (possible range=0 to 88). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
3 months post baseline
Caregiver Qualitative Interview
Time Frame: 3 months post baseline
These interviews will assess caregivers' perception of their relationship with their youth during their study involvement, as well as their feedback about whichever condition they were randomly assigned to, either the RAISE app or brochure.
3 months post baseline
Youth Qualitative Interview
Time Frame: After youth's release to the community within study period (estimated 2 years or less)
Youth will be eligible to participate in a one-time qualitative interview if they have been released into the community while the study is being conducted. Youth interviews will assess their perceptions of support received from their caregiver, their caregiver's stress, and the role of their caregiver in facilitating connection to services.
After youth's release to the community within study period (estimated 2 years or less)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johanna B Folk, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K23DA050798 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on mHealth parenting stress app

Subscribe