- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05039021
A Prospective, Single-Arm Multi-Center Study of the HARMONIC® 1100 Shears in Select Devices
April 24, 2025 updated by: Ethicon Endo-Surgery
A Prospective, Single-Arm Multi-Center Study of the HARMONIC® 1100 Shears and Generator G11 in Pediatric Surgical Procedures (General) and Adult Surgical Procedures (General, Gynecological, Urological, and Thoracic)
This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study will collect clinical data in a post-market setting for the pediatric population (general surgical procedures) and adult population (general, gynecological, urological, and thoracic surgical procedures).
Investigators will perform each procedure using the device in compliance with their standard surgical approach and the HARMONIC 1100 Shears and Generator G11 instructions for use.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
265
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montreal, Canada
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
-
Toronto, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital
-
-
-
-
Scotland
-
Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Western General Hospital
-
-
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
- Baptist Health
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- IU Health University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Pediatric population:
- Non-emergent procedure (general) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU;
- Less than 18 years of age at the time of procedure; and
- The subject's parent/legal guardian must be willing to give permission for the subject to participate in the study and provide written informed consent for the subject. In addition, assent must be obtained from pediatric subjects who possess the intellectual and emotional ability to comprehend the concepts involved in the study. If the pediatric subject is not able to provide assent (due to age, maturity and/or inability to intellectually and/or emotionally comprehend the study), the parent/legal guardian's written informed consent for the subject will be acceptable for the subject to be included in the study.
Adult population:
- Elective procedure (general, gynecological, urological, or thoracic) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU;
- Willingness to give consent and comply with all study-related evaluations and visit schedule; and
- At least 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
Preoperative
- Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation;
- Female subjects, of childbearing age, who are pregnant; or
- Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical study that could impact the study endpoints.
Intraoperative
1. The HARMONIC 1100 Shears were not attempted to be used for at least one single vessel transection during the surgical procedure.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pediatric; adult (HPB, lower gastrointestinal, gastric, gynecological, urological, thoracic)
Any pediatric or adult (hepato-pancreato-biliary, lower gastrointestinal, gastric, gynecological, urological, thoracic) procedures where the HARMONIC 1100 Shears is used for vessel transection according to instructions for use.
|
HARMONIC 1100 Shears is used for vessel transection according to instructions for use.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Time Frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Number of vessels transected with <= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported.
A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels.
Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
|
On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
|
Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)
|
Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported.
Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study device.
Possible refers to the relationship with the use of the device is weak but cannot be ruled out completely; Probable refers to the relationship with the use of the device seems relevant and/or the event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; Causal relationship refers to the event is associated with the device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt.
|
From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Time Frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Number of vessels transected with diameter >5 to 7 mm with <= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported.
A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels.
Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
|
On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
|
Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score
Time Frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Number of participants using HARMONIC 1100 Shears for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score were reported.
Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessel by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.
|
On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
|
Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Time Frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Number of vessels transected with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale was reported.
A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels.
Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
|
On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
|
Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures
Time Frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Number of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products and other products were reported.
A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels.
Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products).
Since multiple responses were collected, sum of the data of each category exceeds the overall number of units analyzed.
|
On the day of transection (Day 0)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Ethicon Endo-Surgery Clinical Trial, Ethicon Endo-Surgery
- Principal Investigator: Troy Markel, MD, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health
- Principal Investigator: Attila Nakeeb, MD, IU Health University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Moishe Liberman, MD, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 29, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 4, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
March 12, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 9, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 30, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 24, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- ENG_2020_06
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health.
Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.