Comparison of iGel and THRIVE on Bronchoscopic Interventions

February 15, 2023 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Analysis of Intraoperative Homeostasis and Postoperative Recovery After Interventional Bronchoscopy With Different Anesthetic Management

THRIVE and iGEL were applied for maintain oxygenation in bronchoscopic interventions which could not performed with an endotracheal tube. However, besides the risk of desaturation, the differences on difficulties to approach vocal cords, the responses to spay of local anesthetics including cough or spasm, the CO2 elimination, the hemodynamic changes, and the effects on postoperative recovery are rarely investigated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

THRIVE and iGEL were applied for maintain oxygenation in bronchoscopic interventions which could not performed with an endotracheal tube. Unlike the nasal cannula with THRIVE, the tips of iGel are located in upper esophagi, it may affect the postoperative swallowing, especially for the aged group. However, the bronchoscopic approach may be easier for an established route to vocal cords. With shared airway for ventilation and interventions, CO2 elimination is hardly monitored besides the risk of desaturation.

In this study, THRIVE or iGel was planned to be randomized used for bronchoscopic interventions in an adult group (age 20-65) and an aged group (age over 65). The difficulties to approach vocal cords, the responses to spay of local anesthetics including cough or spasm, the CO2 elimination, the hemodynamic changes, and the effects on postoperative recovery are compared between THRIVE and iGel groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • plan to receive bronchoscopic interventions with total intravenous anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • awake bronchoscopy pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: high-flow nasal oxygen
THRIVE( Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange), a method of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), is planned to applied for bronchoscopic interventions
cough response, the changes of BP, HR, SpO2, Trans dermal CO2 during bronchoscopic interventions
Other Names:
  • hemodynamic and ventilatory responses from insertion of broncoscopy to the end of bronchoscopic interventions
anesthetic recovery in postoperative care unit recovery of swallowing by questionnaire in POD1
Active Comparator: supraglottic devise
iGel, a supraglottic devise with tip in upper esophagus, is planned to applied for bronchoscopic interventions
cough response, the changes of BP, HR, SpO2, Trans dermal CO2 during bronchoscopic interventions
Other Names:
  • hemodynamic and ventilatory responses from insertion of broncoscopy to the end of bronchoscopic interventions
anesthetic recovery in postoperative care unit recovery of swallowing by questionnaire in POD1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difficulty of bronchoscopic approach
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to visualize vocal cords
time from insertion to visualize vocal cord, records of manipulations if applied
from bronchoscopic insertion to visualize vocal cords
response to spraying local anesthetics by bronchoscopy
Time Frame: from visualizng vocal cords to complete local anesthetic spray in trachea and main bronchi
the status of vocal cords visualized (relaxed, closed, relaxed but close with spray of local anesthetics); cough scale during bronchoscopic insertion and spray of local anesthetics
from visualizng vocal cords to complete local anesthetic spray in trachea and main bronchi

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hemodynamic changes
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
changes on MAP (mmHg)
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
cough scale
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
cough intensity X times
from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
SPO2
Time Frame: every 5 minutes from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
pulse oximeter, hemoglobin saturation (%)
every 5 minutes from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
Transdermal CO2
Time Frame: every 5 minutes from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
data obyenied from transdermal CO2 (mmHg)
every 5 minutes from bronchoscopic insertion to the end of procedure
postanesthetic recovery
Time Frame: from admission to PACU to discharge from PACU
time stay in postoperative care unit (minutes)
from admission to PACU to discharge from PACU

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EAT-10 questionnaire (score):0-40
Time Frame: preoperative and postoperative day 1
EAT-10 for postbronchoscopic swallowing dysfunction, from 0 (normal swallowing) to 40 (extreme difficulty on swallowing)
preoperative and postoperative day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fu-Chang Tsai, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202011092RINA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

if there is similar investigation

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after completion of investigation

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Subscribe