The South African Collaborative Surgical Outcomes Study (SACSOS) (SACSOS)

May 19, 2025 updated by: Hyla-Louise Kluyts, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Patient-reported Outcomes After Surgery Using a Digital Health Platform

Improving quality of perioperative care depends on reliable measurement of clinically important and patient-centred data, that will allow collaborative decision-making between patient and clinician. The use of digital health tools to share person-centric data with the aim of improving quality of care is encouraged by the World Health Organization Global Strategy on Digital Health. With virtual and online communication becoming a universal feature of modern life, there is a promising opportunity to engage patients and clinicians in perioperative data collection using digital health platforms. The Perioperative Shared Health Record (PSHR), developed by Safe Surgery South Africa, provides the opportunity to capture standardised patient-centric postoperative outcomes measures, like Quality of Recovery (QOR), Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). These are all standardised measures and questionnaires, which have been recommended by working groups focused on the patient's experience after surgery. The PSHR enables sharing of data between the surgical patient and his/her clinical team (surgeons and anaesthetists).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

SACSOS is a patient-centered prospective observational cohort study.

Initially, clinical teams in the South African private health care sector will be approached. In later phases of the study, recruitment will include eligible patients in the South African public health care sector.

Patient engagement and -participation will be sought during the recruitment process by engaging with the clinical team (surgeon, anaesthetist, hospital clinical manager) for individual patient care (at a micro level); in data collection using a patient-centric platform; and in the follow up after surgery. Data will be collected by patients using a digital platform, the Perioperative Shared Health Record (PSHR). De-identified data will be extracted from the database at predetermined intervals and made available to the principal investigator for analysis.

The PSHR will be updated to optimise health information exchange between the surgical patient and clinical team members during the study.

Participation from health care providers will be in a team-based approach, including surgeon(s) and/or anaesthetist(s) at each specific center. A core group of participating centers will be identified.

The study will focus on patient participation with the web-based platform as the primary recruitment method. This will reduce the need for clinician input, and promote greater patient-centeredness. Patient participation and data capturing require internet access to the web-based platform.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

To enable a patient-centred approach, patients will be invited to participate in the study by a member of the clinical team responsible for their care. Initially, clinical teams in the South African private health care sector will be approached. In later phases of the study, recruitment will include eligible patients in the South African public health care sector.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients presenting for any surgical procedure at South African hospitals during the specified study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to provide consent to participation.
  • Patients whose legal guardian is unable to provide consent to participation (if applicable).
  • Patients unable to nominate next-of-kin, guardian of or a person of their choice, as their representative during follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients within the private healthcare sector
Patients from private sector hospitals in South Africa accommodating the use of the Bespoke Surgical Institute (BSI) Deep Health clinical data platform.
No intervention will be done. Two groups of patients will be recruited: patients receiving surgery in the Private Healthcare Sector, and patients receiving surgery in the Public Healthcare Sector
Patients within the public healthcare sector.
Patients admitted for surgery at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Gauteng Department of Health.
No intervention will be done. Two groups of patients will be recruited: patients receiving surgery in the Private Healthcare Sector, and patients receiving surgery in the Public Healthcare Sector

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe the relationship between preoperative and 6-month postoperative health-related quality of life in South African surgical patients.
Time Frame: 6 Months post-operatively
Health Related Quality of Life, measured with the EQ-5D-5L score, preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively
6 Months post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe the relationship between patient comorbidities, surgical characteristics and postoperative patient- reported outcomes measures (quality of recovery, health-related quality of life).
Time Frame: 24-48 hours postoperatively
Quality of recovery (QoR) preoperatively and at 24-48 hours postoperatively
24-48 hours postoperatively
To assess data quality (accuracy) of the adapted patient-reported POMS by comparison with completed provider POMS.
Time Frame: 5 days postoperatively
Amended Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) postoperatively after 5 days
5 days postoperatively
To compare data quality (completeness) for patient-reported outcomes and provider POMS between public and private sector settings.
Time Frame: 5-7 days postoperatively
POMS recorded by surgeon at discharge from hospital after surgical procedure
5-7 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: BRUCE BICCARD, PhD, University of Cape Town
  • Principal Investigator: Hyla-Louise Kluyts, DMed, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMUREC/M/184/2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Public or Private Sector Patients

Subscribe