Automated Secretion Removal in ICU Patients (TrachFlush)

July 21, 2022 updated by: Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Effect of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology, Named TrachFlush, on the Need for Tracheal Suctioning - Protocol for a Study in Intubated and Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients

SUMMARY Rationale In intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, removal of airway secretions is typically performed by tracheal suctioning, an intervention that is labor-intensive and very unpleasant for the patient. The current study tests the hypothesis that a novel secretion removal technology named TrachFlush, that pushes airway secretions past and above the cuff of the endotracheal tube, reduces the need for tracheal suctioning.

Objective The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether use of the TrachFlush reduces the need for tracheal suctioning. In a selection of patients, one secondary objective is to ascertain the exact volume of airway secretions that is pushed past and above the cuff of the endotracheal tube.

Study design Open prospective intervention study. Study population One hundred adult, intubated and mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to need invasive ventilation > 24 hours.

Intervention The attending nurses activate the TrachFlush when there are secretions present in the larger airways that need to be removed. If this results into a push of airway secretions past and above the cuff of the endotracheal tube, no further action is needed. If unsuccessful, the nurse will perform a standard tracheal suctioning procedure to remove the secretions. In a subset of patients with an endotracheal tube that allows subglottal suctioning, the exact amount of airway secretions present above the cuff will be measured each time the TrachFlush is used.

Main study parameters/endpoints The proportion of successful TrachFlush activations from start of the study to complete weaning from the ventilator, or a maximum of 7 days (primary). Secondary endpoints include the total number of TrachFlush activations during the same time window (all patients), and the exact amount of airway secretions pushed past and above the cuff of the endotracheal tube (in patients with a tube allows subglottal suctioning).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness Inappropriate deflation or inflation of the endotracheal cuff by the TrachFlush could cause harm. However, the cuff pressure will be checked regularly, and if necessary corrected, at least every time the TrachFlush has been used. Patients may benefit from the intervention, as the need for tracheal suctioning may reduce.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • admission to one of the participating ICUs;
  • intubated with an endotracheal tube containing a cuff;
  • receiving invasive mechanical ventilation; and
  • expected to need invasive ventilation beyond the following calendar day at the moment of inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years;
  • known or suspected tracheal damage, e.g., after inhalation trauma, thorax trauma, or intubation trauma;
  • any condition for which deflation of the endotracheal cuff is deemed detrimental, e.g., in case high airway pressures are needed; and
  • any infection, or colonization with pathogens that require strict single isolation of the patient (cohort isolation is allowed).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: TrachFlush
The attending nurses activate the TrachFlush when there are secretions present in the larger airways that need to be removed. If this results into a push of airway secretions past and above the cuff of the endotracheal tube, no further action is needed. If unsuccessful, the nurse will perform a standard tracheal suctioning procedure to remove the secretions. In a subset of patients with an endotracheal tube that allows subglottal suctioning, the exact amount of airway secretions present above the cuff will be measured each time the TrachFlush is used.
Other Names:
  • endotracheal suctioning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
proportion of successful TrachFlush activations from start of the study to complete weaning from the ventilator, or a maximum of 7 days
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
total number of TrachFlush activations during the same time window (all patients)
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
incidence of hypoxemia related to the TrachFlush activation or tracheal suction
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Incidence of hypotension related to the TrachFlush activation or tracheal suction
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Incidence of patient agitation related to the TrachFlush activation or tracheal suctions
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
The volume of subglottal secretions with each TrachFlush intervention (in a patients with an endotracheal tube in place that allows subglottic suctioning).
Time Frame: 7days
7days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederique Paulus, PhD, AIDS Malignancy Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TrachFlush

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Clinical Trials on TrachFlush

Subscribe