Arrhythmia Detection After MI (AID MI)

July 10, 2025 updated by: Samir Saba

Arrhythmia Detection After Myocardial Infarction Trial

Patients post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a high risk of mortality but the use of an implantable defibrillator in the early aftermath of an AMI has not been shown to improve patients' survival. The VEST trial recently demonstrated an improved overall survival in post AMI patients with the use of a wearable defibrillator. The same improvement was not demonstrated for the risk of sudden cardiac death. Monitoring patients after AMI using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) may document findings that can impact patient management and eventually improve their outcomes. We are therefore conducting the AID MI trial to examine the impact of ICM on patient management in the post AMI setting.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Patients who have ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation at least 48 hours after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a higher risk of sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines recommend that for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% should wait at least 40 days post-AMI or 90 days post revascularization prior to receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This period of time potentially leaves a vulnerable population without protection from sudden cardiac death (SCD).

The landmark MADIT I and MADIT II trials demonstrated that ICD therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy at any interval of time. The DINAMIT study demonstrated that ICD placement less than 40 days after AMI had a reduction in arrhythmic mortality at the cost of an increase in non-arrhythmic mortality. Results from these and other studies suggest that the risk of SCD after AMI may be time-dependent and that patients at increased risk for SCD are also at increased risk for death from other causes. Thus, there is a need for additional studies to identify subsets of patients with arrhythmias that may benefit from other therapeutic interventions such as ablations, anti-arrhythmic medications, implantable cardiac devices, or other therapies.

The CARISMA study was the first study to document the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in post-AMI patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF≤40%) using an implantable loop recorder. Results showed high incidences of arrhythmias such as new-onset AF (27.6%) and high-degree AV block (9.8%). Subsequent studies showed that these arrhythmias were associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, stroke, reinfarction, or cardiac death.

It has been shown that utilizing remote monitoring as part of clinical care in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices is associated with improved all-cause survival; the magnitude of survival increases with the degree of adherence to remote monitoring and the timeliness to enroll and activate in remote monitoring shortly after device implantation.

These studies suggest the need for further investigation and evaluation of acute and long-term cardiac monitoring in post-AMI patients, in an effort to identify patients at greatest risk, inform clinical decision making and potentially reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. In addition, the ability to remotely monitor patients may minimize the time to diagnosis and enable early intervention in this patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Samir F Saba, MD
  • Phone Number: 412 647 2695
  • Email: sabas@upmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • UPMC Presbyterian Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults, age 18 years or older
  • AMI (STEMI and NSTEMI)
  • Willing to give written informed consent
  • Expected discharge from hospital within 7 days of AMI
  • Willing to receive ICM insertion within 21 days of index AMI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing pacemaker, ICD, ICM, or any other implantable cardiac electronic device
  • Pregnant
  • Index AMI was more than 21 days
  • Unwilling/cannot insert ICM within 21 days post AMI
  • Planned ICD implant, planned CABG or any open-heart surgery (e.g. for severe valvular disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Post-AMI patients in this arm will receive standard of care
Routine monitoring of post AMI patient with clinic visits
Other Names:
  • Control
Experimental: ICM
Post-AMI patients in this arm will receive standard of care and an ICM
Implantation of ICM through small incision (2 mm) under the skin
Other Names:
  • ICM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes to patient management
Time Frame: 90 days post AMI
Incidence (frequency) of cardiac arrhythmias (bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, pause, etc…) that lead to actionable treatment change
90 days post AMI
Time to diagnosis and/or treatment of cardiac arrhythmia
Time Frame: 90 days post AMI
days post randomization
90 days post AMI

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes to patient management
Time Frame: 24 months
Incidence (frequency) of cardiac arrhythmias (bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, pause, etc…) that lead to actionable treatment change
24 months
Mortality
Time Frame: at 90 days
all-cause mortality
at 90 days
Mortality
Time Frame: at 24 months
All-cause mortality
at 24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression and Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: at 90 days
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Minimum 0 and maximum 21 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)
at 90 days
Depression and Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: at 24 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Minimum 0 and maximum 21 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)
at 24 months
Physical and Mental Health
Time Frame: at 90 days
PROMIS-29 scale Scale ranges from 29 to 145 with a higher number indicating better physical and mental health
at 90 days
Physical and Mental Health
Time Frame: at 24 months
PROMIS-29 scale Scale ranges from 29 to 145 with a higher number indicating better physical and mental health
at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samir F Saba, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Publication of protocol, methods, results in aggregates

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after publication of the mainmanuscript

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Submit request to PI Only de-identified data will be shared

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Subscribe