Influence of Sun Protection and Linear Repair of Cutaneous Surgical Defects

March 26, 2026 updated by: University of California, Davis

Influence of Sun Protection on the Aesthetic Outcomes Following Linear Repair of Cutaneous Surgical Defects, a Randomized Split-Wound Study

The purpose of this study is to determine the potential influence of sun protection on the aesthetic outcome of post-surgical scars following the reconstruction of Mohs micrographic surgery defects via linear repair. This study will be performed as a randomized split-wound study. Half of the wound will be treated with zinc containing sunscreen and the other half of the wound would not be treated. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be evaluated via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument, as well as a colorimeter to measure the amount of vascularity, and hyperpigmentation between the treated and the non-treated area compared to the 'surrounding skin' defined as skin in the proximity but not adjacent to the wound. Any adverse events will also be recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary linear repair remains a fundamental and common means of closing skin defects; however, to date, there are no clinical studies currently within the medical literature that explore the potential influence that sunlight exposure has on the cosmetic outcome of surgical site cutaneous scars. Therefore, this study aims to determine the potential effects of sun protection on post-surgical scar cosmesis following linear repairs on sun-exposed areas of the face, hairless scalp, and neck.

It has been thought that sun exposure is associated with a higher chance of erythema and dyspigmentation in cutaneous wounds, however, this remains unproven and findings pertaining to this topic remain largely confined to animal studies. In one study, researchers found that the wounds of rats chronically exposed to UVA radiation exhibited diminished wound contraction during the healing process compared to non-irradiated controls. Another study simulated UV radiation before and after laser treatment on vascular skin lesions in groups of hairless mice. In the postoperative UV-irradiated group, the mice skin displayed significant fibrosis, slower healing, and marked hyperpigmentation. A different group of researchers explored the effect of UVA light exposure on wound pigmentation on scars with and without dry tattooing. This study found that dry tattooing with UVA light exposure demonstrated significant improvement of hypopigmented scars. The researchers of this study hypothesized that the light exposure led to an inflammation-driven hyperpigmentation response. A separate study hypothesized that UV exposure may be beneficial for wound healing by stimulating melanocyte distribution via keratinocyte-melanocyte cross-talk, and thus, preventing hypopigmentation. Irregularity in the pigmentation of healing scars remains a large insecurity of patients and has led to their desire for surgical corrections of these scars. These researchers suggested that UV exposure will promote melanin production, and thus, potentiate a protective effect against further UV damage and wound hypopigmentation.

Skin color changes provide information and clues about certain pathologies, disease progression, and patient response to treatment. Factors such as melanin vascularity contribute to skin color. Historically, this evaluation of skin color has been subjective, however, objective analysis is now possible by means of colorimeters. Cutaneous color changes can be quantified using the standardized CIELAB system, which measures color light intensity, as well as red/green and yellow/blue intensity. Following Mohs micrographic surgery, the colorimeter can be used as an objective measurement to assess scar hyperpigmentation and vascularity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • University of California, Davis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Patient is able to provide informed consent
  3. Patient is scheduled for a cutaneous excisional surgical procedure
  4. Cutaneous surgical wound closed via linear repair
  5. Surgery performed on sunlight-exposed anatomical regions (head, face, neck, hairless scalp)
  6. Patient is willing to return for follow-up visit to clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is incarcerated
  2. Patient is < 18 years of age
  3. Patient is pregnant
  4. Patient unwilling to return for 3-month follow-up
  5. History of reaction to zinc containing sunscreen
  6. History of collagen vascular disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sunscreen Application
The study participant will be instructed to start applying the sunscreen provided to them to the randomly assigned half of the wound (A or B).
The study participant will be randomized via a randomization tool within the REDCap database as to which half of the wound ("A" or "B") the patient will be asked to apply zinc containing sunscreen for the duration of the study.
Experimental: No Suncreen Application
The study participant will be instructed to not apply the sunscreen provided to them to the randomly assigned half of the wound (A or B).
The study participant will be randomized via a randomization tool within the REDCap database as to which half of the wound ("A" or "B") the patient will be asked to apply zinc containing sunscreen for the duration of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient observer assessment score (POSAS)
Time Frame: 3-12 months

The primary end point will be the two blinded reviewers sum of the component parts of the patient observer assessment score (POSAS).

The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Categories boxes are added for each item. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10.

3-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Colorimeter measurement of wound vascularity and hyperpigmentation.
Time Frame: 3-12 months
The secondary endpoints will be the measures of wound vascularity and hyperpigmentation. The colorimeter uses the variables L*, a*, and b* as a means of expressing color as a quantifiable number. L* measuring color brightness between 0 to 100 with 0 being total black and 100 being total white. The a* parameter changes from positive values for red to negative values for green for evaluating the degree of erythema and vascularity. The b* parameter changes from positive values for yellow to a negative value for blue. The L* and b* values will calculate the ITA measure, which represents the overall pigmentation of skin color, where a higher ITA corresponds to lighter skin color. Increased pigmentation of the skin will be seen by a rising b* value and a decreasing L* value.
3-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound

Clinical Trials on Zinc containing suncreen

Subscribe