- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05076227
Effect of Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Schedules and Vaccination Intervals on Reactogenicity and Humoral Immunogenicity
Comparison of Different BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 Vaccination Intervals and Combinations on Reactogenicity and Humoral Immunogenicity in Adults
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The basic immunizations (first and second vaccination) were performed from January to June 2021 using the m-RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer, B)9 and the vector-based vaccine ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca, A). BNT162b2 was used to boost vaccine all study population. The time interval between the basic immunisation and the boost vaccination varied.
Four vaccine-groups could be distinguished:
Group 1 received BNT162b2 with the second vaccination 3 weeks after the first vaccination.
Vaccinees of groups 2 and 3 received AZD1222/ChAdOx1-S as first vaccination and could choose after 12 weeks whether second vaccination with BNT162b2 or AZD1222/ChAdOx1-S should be carried out. This results in homologous (first: AZD1222/ChAdOx1-S, second: AZD1222/ChAdOx1-S) and heterologous (first: AZD1222/ChAdOx1-S, second: BNT162b2) vaccine combinations.
Group 4 received BNT162b2 with the second vaccination 6 weeks after first vaccination.
Blood samples were collected at six time points: four weeks, three and six months after completion of the basic immunization, immediately before boost vaccination, four weeks and three months after boost vaccination.
Reactogenicity after first, second, and boost vaccination was assessed using questionnaires to determine vaccine-induced adverse drug reactions (ADR) within seven days after the respective vaccinations.
In addition, demographic data (age, gender, occupational group, allergies) were collected, local and systemic vaccination reactions are differentiated and the need for medication and inability to work as a result of vaccination reactions are prospectively recorded.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Niedersachsen
-
Hildesheim, Niedersachsen, Germany, 31135
- Helios Hospital Hildesheim
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- hospital staff who received COVID-19 vaccination
Exclusion Criteria:
- lack of a written informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
BNT162b2/BNT162b2 - 3 wks
hospital staff receiving BioNTech as prime vaccination and also receiving BioNTech after 3 weeks as boost vaccination
|
mRNA vaccination
Other Names:
|
|
ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 - 12 wks
hospital staff receiving AstraZeneca as prime vaccination and also receiving AstraZeneca as boost vaccination after 12 weeks
|
vector based vaccination
Other Names:
|
|
ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 - 12 wks
hospital staff receiving AstraZeneca as prime vaccination and receiving BioNTech as boost vaccination after 12 weeks
|
mRNA vaccination
Other Names:
vector based vaccination
Other Names:
|
|
BNT162b2/BNT162b2 - 6 wks
hospital staff receiving BioNTech as prime vaccination and also receiving BioNTech after 6 weeks as boost vaccination
|
mRNA vaccination
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein 4 weeks after second vaccination
Time Frame: 4 weeks after second vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
4 weeks after second vaccination
|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein 3 months after second vaccination
Time Frame: 3 months after second vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
3 months after second vaccination
|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein 6 months after second vaccination
Time Frame: 6 months after second vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
6 months after second vaccination
|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein directly before boost vaccination
Time Frame: directly before boost vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
directly before boost vaccination
|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein 4 weeks after boost vaccination
Time Frame: 4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
|
Difference between the four cohorts regarding the antibody of the viral spike protein 3 months after boost vaccination
Time Frame: 3 months after boost vaccination
|
The descriptive data are described by frequencies (%/n) and the continuous data by corresponding position parameters (median, interquartile range). The confirmatory analysis is performed using the Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Bonferroni correction is applied accordingly. |
3 months after boost vaccination
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population at four weeks regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: 4 weeks after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
Spearman's correlation is calculated.
|
4 weeks after second vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: 4 weeks after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
To investigate a potential influence of the variables, a logistic regression is performed if necessary.
|
4 weeks after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population at 3 months regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: 3 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
Spearman's correlation is calculated.
|
3 months after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population at 6 months regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: 6 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
Spearman's correlation is calculated.
|
6 months after second vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: 3 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
To investigate a potential influence of the variables, a logistic regression is performed if necessary.
|
3 months after second vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: 6 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
To investigate a potential influence of the variables, a logistic regression is performed if necessary.
|
6 months after second vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ in terms of reactogenicity (systemic and/or local vaccine reactions) after the first vaccination?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ in terms of reactogenicity (systemic and/or local vaccine reactions) after the second vaccination?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ in terms of reactogenicity (systemic and/or local vaccine reactions) after the boost vaccination?
Time Frame: immediately after third (boost) vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after third (boost) vaccination
|
|
Differences between the 4 groups after first vaccination regarding a. the individual local vaccination reactions? b. the individual systemic vaccination reactions? c. the number or percentage of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Differences between the 4 groups after second vaccination regarding a. the individual local vaccination reactions? b. the individual systemic vaccination reactions? c. the number or percentage of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Differences between the 4 groups after boost vaccination regarding a. the individual local vaccination reactions? b. the individual systemic vaccination reactions? c. the number or percentage of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after boost vaccination
|
|
Is there a difference between the four cohorts regarding the severity of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Is there a difference between the four cohorts regarding the severity of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a difference between the four cohorts regarding the severity of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after boost vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ with respect to the temporal occurrence of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ with respect to the temporal occurrence of vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a difference between the four cohorts regarding the use of medication due to vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: first and second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
first and second vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ with regard to the need for a certificate of incapacity for work due to vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Are there differences regarding the job groups and the vaccination week days?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ with regard to the need for a certificate of incapacity for work due to vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Are there differences regarding the job groups and the vaccination week days?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Do the four cohorts differ with regard to the need for a certificate of incapacity for work due to vaccination reactions?
Time Frame: immediately after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after boost vaccination
|
|
Are there differences regarding the job groups and the vaccination week days?
Time Frame: immediately after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after boost vaccination
|
|
Are there differences within the cohorts regarding vaccination reactions in subjects with a known allergy?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Are there differences within the total population regarding vaccination reactions in subjects with a known allergy?
Time Frame: immediately after first vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after first vaccination
|
|
Are there differences within the cohorts regarding vaccination reactions in subjects with a known allergy?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Are there differences within the total population regarding vaccination reactions in subjects with a known allergy?
Time Frame: immediately after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
immediately after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population directly before the boost regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: directly before boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
directly before boost vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: directly before boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
directly before boost vaccination
|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population at 4 weeks after boost regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: 4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: 4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
4 weeks after boost vaccination
|
|
Is there a correlation within cohorts or within the overall population at 3 months after boost regarding the level of antibody and the a. Extent of vaccine response (local, systemic, local & systemic, none)? b. Gender? c. Age? d. BMI?
Time Frame: 3 months after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
3 months after boost vaccination
|
|
Do the variables listed above have an influence on the level of antibody?
Time Frame: 3 months after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
3 months after boost vaccination
|
|
Is there a statistically significant or clinically relevant difference between the (drop in) antibodies at three months from baseline within the four cohorts?
Time Frame: 3 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
3 months after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a statistically significant or clinically relevant difference between the (drop in) antibodies at six months from baseline within the four cohorts?
Time Frame: 6 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
6 months after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a statistically significant or clinically relevant difference between the (drop in) antibodies at three months from baseline between the four cohorts?
Time Frame: 3 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
3 months after second vaccination
|
|
Is there a statistically significant or clinically relevant difference between the (drop in) antibodies at six months from baseline between the four cohorts?
Time Frame: 6 months after second vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
6 months after second vaccination
|
|
Are there any subjects within the study follow-up period who had proven SARS Cov2 infection? (Comparison between groups)
Time Frame: until end of study
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
The analysis is performed using appropriate tests such as Fisher's exact test, Chi² test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test.
|
until end of study
|
|
Is there a correlation within the overall population between the level of antibody and detected SARS Cov2 infection?
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after second vaccination, directly before boost vaccination and 4 weeks and 3 months after boost vaccination
|
For the secondary endpoints, frequencies (%/n) for categorical data and corresponding measures of location (median, interquartile range) for continuous data are used descriptively.
|
3 months and 6 months after second vaccination, directly before boost vaccination and 4 weeks and 3 months after boost vaccination
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Serge C Thal, MD, University of Witten/Herdecke
- Principal Investigator: Michael Dedroogh, MD, Helios Clinical Hildesheim
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HelCoVac
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV2 Infection
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of CirculationUnknown
-
Collegium Medicum w BydgoszczyRecruitingSARS-CoV2 Infection | SARS-CoV2 AntibodiesPoland
-
Collegium Medicum w BydgoszczyActive, not recruitingSARS-CoV2 Infection | SARS-CoV2 AntibodiesPoland
-
University Hospital, LilleFondation Santé RoquetteCompleted
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleFondation Santé RoquetteWithdrawn
-
Medical University of ViennaWithdrawnSars-CoV2 | Prophylaxis | Infection Viral | Healthcare Worker
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)CompletedSARS-CoV2 InfectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on IM injection of vaccination (mRNA vaccination)
-
Duke UniversityWashington University School of Medicine; University of Pittsburgh; Centers for... and other collaboratorsCompletedCOVID-19 | InfluenzaUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkInnovation Fund Denmark; Ministry of Education, DenmarkRecruitingMyocarditis | SARS-CoV2 Infection | Myopericarditis | Vaccination; Complications | COVID-19 PandemicDenmark
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Dutch...Completed
-
University Medical Center GroningenRadboud University Medical Center; Maastricht University Medical Center; UMC... and other collaboratorsCompletedVaccine Response | Immunosuppression | COVID-19 Vaccines | Varicella Zoster VaccineNetherlands
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity of Sierra Leone; Innovative Medicines InitiativeCompletedEbola Virus DiseaseSierra Leone
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknown
-
Duke UniversityCompletedHealthyUnited States, Brazil
-
Washington State UniversityUniversity of Glasgow; National Institute for Medical Research, TanzaniaCompletedRabies in Animals | Worms; IntestineUnited States
-
Gylden Pharma LtdNot yet recruitingCOVID-19 | Coronavirus | SARS-CoV-2 InfectionPhilippines
-
University Hospital, EssenKarolinska Institutet; Leiden University Medical Center; Universitätsklinikum...Not yet recruitingGlioblastoma (GBM)