A Multicenter, Prospective Trial of the IAB in Adults Suffering From COPD/Emphysema (IAB-1)

March 11, 2026 updated by: Pulmair Medical, Inc.

The Pulmair Implantable Artificial Bronchus (IAB) is a device intended for implantation into the diseased bronchi of emphysema patients. The IAB is indicated for bronchoscopic treatment of adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)/emphysema to relieve hyperinflation and allow bidirectional ventilation of the affected lobes.

The objective of this trial is to demonstrate a suitable benefit/risk profile to support a subsequent trial of the safety and effectiveness of the IAB to achieve its intended purpose.

The trial will enroll 24 subjects implanted with IAB(s), at no more than three study centers.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Porto Alegre, Brazil, CEP 90035-003
        • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
      • Heidelberg, Germany, D-69126
        • Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed Informed Consent
  2. Diagnosis of COPD/emphysema
  3. Age 40 to 75 years
  4. Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2
  5. 6-minute walk Distance between 100 meters and 500 meters at baseline exam
  6. Stable disease with less than 10 mg prednisone (or equivalent) daily
  7. Non-smoking for 4 months prior to screening interview
  8. FEV1 between 15% and 50% of predicted value at baseline exam
  9. FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 70%
  10. RV > 175%
  11. mMRC score ≥ 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently participating in another clinical study
  2. Women of child-bearing potential
  3. More than 2 COPD exacerbation episodes requiring hospitalization in the last year at screening
  4. Any COPD exacerbations within 6 weeks of planned intervention
  5. Two or more instances of pneumonia episodes in the last year at screening
  6. Clinically significant mucus production or chronic bronchitis
  7. Myocardial Infarction or unstable / uncontrolled congestive heart failure within 6 months of screening
  8. Prior lung transplant, Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS), bullectomy or lobectomy
  9. Clinically significant bronchiectasis
  10. Unable to safely discontinue anti-coagulants or platelet activity inhibitors for 7 days
  11. Uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure > 45 mm Hg) or evidence or history of cor pulmonale as determined by recent echocardiogram (completed within the last 3 months prior to screening visit)
  12. Suspected pulmonary nodule or lung cancer
  13. High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) collected per CT scanning protocol within the last 6 months of screening date and evaluated by clinical site personnel using 3D segmentation software shows:

    1. Large bullae encompassing greater than 30% of either lung
    2. Insufficient landmarks to evaluate the CT study using the software as it is intended
    3. All lobes are less than 25% parenchyma diseased (< -950 HU)
  14. Any cardiac comorbidity which the PI believes would compromise the safety of the patient after an IAB implant
  15. Total Lung Capacity (TLC) < 100% predicted at screening
  16. Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) < 15% or > 50% of predicted value at screening
  17. Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 50 mm Hg or Denver scale greater than 55 mm Hg on room air at screening
  18. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) < 45 mm Hg or Denver scale less than 30 mm Hg on room air at screening
  19. Plasma cotinine level > 13.7 ng/ml or carboxyhemoglobin (arterial or ear lobe capillary) > 2.5% at screening
  20. Any other conditions, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for inclusion, or could interfere with the patient participating in or completing the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IAB System
Patients will be treated with IAB(s)
Bronchoscopic implantation of one or multiple IABs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - Incidence of respiratory serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)

The primary endpoint is the occurrence of respiratory SAEs:

  • Acute asthma/bronchospasm requiring intensive/critical care unit admission
  • Acute COPD exacerbation (is acute onset, life-threatening, requires hospitalization)
  • Airway injury from IAB placement/migration/airway stenosis requiring surgical intervention
  • Death from procedure/IAB
  • Massive hemoptysis (est. >100 ml in 24hr requiring transfusion, surgery, or arterial embolization) from procedure/IAB
  • Pneumonia in treated lobe requiring hospitaliz., IV antibiotics, IAB removal
  • Pneumonia NOT in treated lobe (is life-threatening, acute onset, requires hospitaliz. & IV antibiotics)
  • Pneumothorax requiring surgery
  • Tension pneumothorax (is life-threatening, acute onset, requires hospitaliz. & treatment)
  • Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilatory support >24hr

A thoracic SAE composite, based on number of subjects experiencing a thoracic SAE, will also be calculated and tabulated.

From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety - Incidence of other serious adverse device effects (SADEs)
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
All other SADEs are a secondary endpoint, made from the accumulation of adverse events (AEs) to be recorded as they occur regardless of the follow-up schedule.
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Residual Volume (RV), absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in Residual Volume (RV)
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Residual Volume (RV), percent change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percent change in RV (% predicted)
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in FEV1
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), percentage change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percentage change in FEV1
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD), absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in 6MWD
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD), percent change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percent change in 6MWD
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score, absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in mMRC dyspnea score. Scores range from 0-4, with a decrease in score representing improved perception of disability attributable to dyspnea.
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in SGRQ total score. Scores range from 0-100, with a decrease in score representing overall improvement in health, daily life, and perceived well-being.
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), percent change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percent change in SGRQ
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - COPD Assessment Test (CAT), absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute changes in CAT. Scores range from 0-40, with a decrease in score representing decreased impact of cough, sputum, dyspnea, and chest tightness on overall health status.
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score, percent change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percent change in CAT Total Score
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - European Quality of Life, 5-Dimensional Test (EQ-5D) Summary Index, absolute change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Absolute change in EQ-5D Summary Index. Index values range from 0-1, with a decrease in index value indicating an improvement in health-related quality of life.
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Efficacy - European Quality of Life, 5-Dimensional Test (EQ-5D) Summary Index, percent change
Time Frame: From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)
Percent change in EQ-5D Summary Index
From baseline to 90 days post implant (for endpoint evaluation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hugo Goulart de Oliveira, MD, PhD, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on IAB System

Subscribe