Investigation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cosmetic Product With Onabotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Facial Lines

October 21, 2021 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blinded, Placebo Controlled, Split-Face Study Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Peptide Anti-Aging Serum With Onabotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Periorbital Facial Wrinkles

This randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, split-face clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the procedure-pairing of OnabotulinumtoxinA with a peptide anti-aging serum to improve facial lines and wrinkles, as well as overall skin texture and radiance of the face after 12 weeks of twice-daily use in female subjects ages 35 - 60 as compared to placebo. A total of 29 subjects completed study participation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, split-face clinical trial was conducted to evaluate procedure pairing of a peptide anti-aging serum with Onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of periorbital facial wrinkles when used over the course of 12 weeks by women with moderate to severe crow's feet wrinkles and fine lines, and mild to moderate photoaging.

Efficacy and tolerability will be assessed through clinical grading at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12. Efficacy evaluation for wrinkles, fine lines, and skin appearance will be graded at rest and at maximum smile for each side. Investigator and subject tolerability, self-assessment questionnaire and VISIA photography will be completed at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12.

A total of 29 subjects completed study participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33301
        • Shino Bay Cosmetic Dermatology and Laser Institute
    • Iowa
      • Coralville, Iowa, United States, 52241
        • Infinity Skin Care
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
        • Juvly Aesthetics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects must be between 35-60 years of age.
  2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use a form of birth control during the study.
  3. Subjects with Fitzpatrick I-VI photo skin type.
  4. Subjects must have moderate to severe crow's feet facial wrinkles (score 4-7 on 0-9 scale) using modified Griffith's 10-point scale.
  5. Subjects must have moderate to severe crow's feet fine lines (score 4-7 on 0-9 scale) using modified Griffith's 10-point scale.
  6. Subjects may have mild to moderate photo-aging (score 3-6 on 0-9 scale) secondary to physiologic aging, hormonal influences, and environmental stressors.
  7. Subjects must have no skin disease in the facial area being evaluated.
  8. Subjects must have no known medical conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation.
  9. Subjects must be willing to provide verbal understanding and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy.
  2. Subjects with severe overall photo damage (score 7-9 on 0-9 scale) as determined by the Investigator.
  3. Subjects who have demonstrated a previous hypersensitivity reaction to any of the ingredients of the study products or to the botulinum toxin.
  4. Subjects who are unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Peptide Antiaging Serum

Dosage Form: Serum composed of water, thickener, and bioactive ingredients including peptides and antioxidants.

Frequency of Dosage: Twice daily. Subjects will be asked to pump 1x and apply to assigned facial side (left or right) corresponding to randomization.

Study Duration: 12 weeks

Subjects will receive 20 - 24 units to the crows feet (10 - 12 units per side)
Other Names:
  • Botulinum Toxin, Allergan
Facial Cleanser to be used by participants twice daily
Bland moisturizer to be used by study participants after serum twice daily.
Bland Sunscreen to be used by study participants after serum and moisturizer in the morning. Sunscreen to be reapplied if continuous sun exposure occurs.
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Face Milk SPF 40+
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Serum

Dosage Form: Serum composed of water and thickener

Frequency of Dosage: Twice daily. Subjects will be asked to pump 1x and apply to assigned facial side (left or right) corresponding to randomization.

Study Duration: 12 weeks

Subjects will receive 20 - 24 units to the crows feet (10 - 12 units per side)
Other Names:
  • Botulinum Toxin, Allergan
Facial Cleanser to be used by participants twice daily
Bland moisturizer to be used by study participants after serum twice daily.
Bland Sunscreen to be used by study participants after serum and moisturizer in the morning. Sunscreen to be reapplied if continuous sun exposure occurs.
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Face Milk SPF 40+

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Efficacy Grading by Griffith's Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10 point scale. A change in scores at Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84 (+/- 3 days) in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter.

The efficacy parameters will be assessed at rest and at maximum smile and at specific areas on both the left and right sides of the subjects face using a modified Griffith's 10 point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe skin conditions)

0 = None (best possible condition)

1 to 3 = Mild 4 to 6 = Moderate 7 to 9 = Severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

12 weeks
Tolerability Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of erythema, edema, and dryness. A change in scores or lack of significant change at Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84 in comparison to baseline indicates tolerability / safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

0 = None

  1. = Mild
  2. = Moderate
  3. = Severe
12 weeks
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary safety endpoint will be determined by the incidence and severity of adverse events in healthy subjects, including immediate post-procedure and through-out the length of the study.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The secondary efficacy endpoint will be the Self-Assessment Questionnaire. A change in response values at Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84 indicates and improvement compared to baseline response values. Subjects are asked to rate based on a scoring system of the following: from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.
12 weeks
Secondary Tolerability Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The secondary tolerability endpoint will be Subject Tolerability Assessment of burning, itching, and stinging. A change in scores or lack of significant change at Day 28, Day 56, Day 84, and Day 168 in comparison to baseline indicates tolerability / safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

0 = None

  1. = Mild
  2. = Moderate
  3. = Severe
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkles

Clinical Trials on Onabotulinumtoxin A

Subscribe