Characterizing the Use of Ofatumumab in a Real World Setting (EAFToS)

March 13, 2026 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Secondary Use of Data Study Characterizing Kesimpta (Ofatumumab) Onboarding and Utilization in RMS Patients Using MSGo, With a Non-interventional Primary Use of Data Sub-study Comparing Patient Reported Outcomes Relative to Clinical Outcomes (EAFToS)

This is a non-interventional primary use of data study utilizing de-identified patient-level onboarding and adherence data managed through the MSGo patient support service platform and includes a sub-study to explore the impact of ofatumumab on relevant patient reported outcomes (PROs) with respect to clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will be run in two parts. Part I will operate as a Secondary Use of Data study and Part II will operate as a Non-Interventional primary use of data study.

Part I: This study is descriptive in nature without any key underlying hypothesis and will explore the onboarding and adherence of RMS patients in Australia to ofatumumab treatment. De-identified patient-level onboarding and adherence data will be primarily generated and managed through the MSGo platform which will function as a Patient Support Service.

Part II: This part of the study will operate as a non-interventional primary use of data study and will explore the impact of ofatumumab on relevant patient reported outcomes (PROs) with respect to clinical outcomes. This part of the study will only be conducted at a selection of participating clinics. Patients in this part of the study will also have data collected as part of Part I of the study.

The data for the PROs will be collected through a mobile based application .

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Heidelberg, Australia, 3084
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St Leonards, Australia, 2065
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New South Wales
      • Concord, New South Wales, Australia, 2139
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Queensland
      • Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4222
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Australian patients with multiple sclerosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) to delay the progression of physical disability and reduce the frequency of relapse
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 5.5 or lower (aligned with the plannedKEP criteria). Patients accessing ofatumumab through the PBS would have to meet the finalised restriction criteria (to be confirmed).
  • Patients will provide consent to participate in Part I of the study through the MSGo experience program or patient support program onboarding process.
  • Patients will need to provide additional consent to participate in Part II sub-study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with Primary Progressive MS or Secondary Progressive MS without disease activity in line with the Australian Product Information].

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Part II study cohort
Up to 100 participants responding to PROs via the MSGo Patient App
There is no treatment allocation. Patients administered ofatumumab by prescription that have started before inclusion of the patient into the study will be enrolled.
Part I study cohort
Retrospective data analysis of up to 1500 de-identified participants contributing onboarding and adherence data via the MSGo Kesimpta Patient App.
There is no treatment allocation. Patients administered ofatumumab by prescription that have started before inclusion of the patient into the study will be enrolled.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part I and II: Proportion of doses not completed within three days of the expected date
Time Frame: Initiation
Proportion of doses not completed within three days of the expected date during initiation to be collected
Initiation
Part I and II: Proportion of doses not completed within 3 days of the expected date
Time Frame: First 3 months of maintenance
Proportion of doses not completed within 3 days of the expected date during the first three months of maintenance to be collected
First 3 months of maintenance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part I: Proportion of doses not completed within three days of the expected date
Time Frame: initiation period plus 12 months of maintenance
Proportion of doses not completed within three days of the expected date to be collected
initiation period plus 12 months of maintenance
Part I: Proportion of doses not completed within 14 days of the expected date
Time Frame: 12 months of maintentance
Proportion of doses not completed within 14 days of the expected date to be collected
12 months of maintentance
Part I: Proportion of participants with a treatment interruption of more than six months during maintenance
Time Frame: Up to 18 months

Proportion of participants with a treatment interruption of more than six months during maintenance to be collected.

Interruption is calculated as 6 doses not completed

Up to 18 months
Part I: Proportion of participants discontinued within three months of the intial dose
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Proportion of participants discontinued within three months of the intial dose to be collected
Up to 18 months
Part I: Proportion of participants discontinued within 12 months of the intial dose.
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Proportion of participants discontinued within 12 months of the initial dose to be collected
Up to 18 months
Part I: Proportion of doses not completed within three days of the expected date for individual patient sub-groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient sub-groups will be compared to either other complementary sub-groups or the "all patients" cohort
12 months
Part II: Proportion of doses not completed within 14 days of the expected date
Time Frame: during 18 months of maintenance
This outcome measure will be measured for those patients who have MRI completed at approximately 18 months
during 18 months of maintenance
Part II: proportion of participants discontinued within 18 months of the intial dose
Time Frame: within 18 months of the initial dose
This outcome measure will be measured for those patients who have MRI completed at approximately 18 months
within 18 months of the initial dose
Part II: Change in work productivity measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline,6 months, 12 months, 18 months
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) measures Four domain specific scores assessing work productivity and activity impairment (Absenteeism; Presenteeism; Mean work productivity; Activity impairment). Scores range from 0 to 100%. The four scores are expressed as impairment percentages with a higher score indicating less productivity and greater activity impairment.
Baseline,6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Part II: Change in generic health status as measured by the EQ5D
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
It comprises of a short descriptive system questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile of a respondents health state and the VAS provides an alternative way to elicit an individuals rating of their own overall current health. Scale is rated from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable scale)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Part II: Change in fatigue as measured by the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Function (FSMC).
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
The FSMC is an assessment of MS-related cognitive and motor fatigue. A Likert-type 5-point scale (ranging from 'does not apply at all' to 'applies completely') produces a score between 1 and 5 for each scored question. Thus minimum value is 20 (no fatigue at all) and maximum value is 100 (severest grade of fatigue).
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Part II: Assessment of treatment satisfaction as measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM1.4)
Time Frame: Day 28, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
TSQM version 1.4 is a global satisfaction scale used to assess the overall level of participant's satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their medications. It comprises of 14 items assessing the following 4 domains: effectiveness (questions: 1-3), side effects (questions: 4-8), convenience (questions: 9-11), global satisfaction (questions: 12-14). For each of the 4 domains the scores of the corresponding items were added based on an algorithm to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated greater satisfaction .
Day 28, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Part II: Proportion of self administration
Time Frame: 18 months
Proportion of self administration as calculated by the number of self administered doses compared to the total number of doses over the total study time
18 months
Part II: Proportion of patients initiating ofatumumab who are treatment naïve
Time Frame: Baseline
Proportion of patients initiating ofatumumab who are treatment naïve relative to prior high efficacy therapy as defined in Australia as alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, natalizumab and cladribine) and other non-high efficacy Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs).
Baseline
Part II: Change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

EDSS is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.

EDSS scores range between 0 and 10 in 0.5 unit increments. Scores increase when the severity of the disability increases

Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Part II: Annualized relapse rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured by number of relapses over a period of approximately 12 months.
12 months
Part II: Number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions per MRI scan
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
This will only be assessed where gadolinium is used as per Institution's usual practice. Otherwise, this will not be reported
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Part II: Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI to be collected
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Percentage brain volume change
Time Frame: 12 months follow up
The percent brain volume change analysis will be performed at 12 months follow up (either Month 12 (cf. Baseline) or Month 18 (cf. Month 6), via use of the SIENA method for atrophy analysis.
12 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on ofatumumab

Subscribe