- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05098158
Community-Engaged Options to Facilitate Opioid Reduction (COMFORT)
September 16, 2025 updated by: Marian Wilson, Washington State University
Community-Engaged Options to Maximize and Facilitate Opioid Reduction Through Treatment
This study investigates how adults prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain respond to invitations to try non-opioid options of massage therapy, yoga therapy, chiropractic and physical therapies.
Options will be available via telehealth consultation visits using a computer or smartphone with internet connection.
The investigators will measure effects on pain, pain-related symptoms, and opioid use over time using a single-group design.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will be recruited from local primary care practices and asked to complete a baseline survey.
They will then meet with a registered nurse via teleconference for a complete pain assessment.
At the end of the session, participants will be asked to choose two of four available modalities for telehealth consultation.
Participants will be scheduled for six telehealth sessions, once per week x six weeks with three consultations per each chosen therapy.
Measurements of pain, mood, sleep, medicine use will be captured at baseline, three weeks and six weeks and examined for changes over time.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
21
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99201
- Community Health Association of Spokane
-
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99201
- Washington State University College of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- enrollment in treatment at the CHAS Perry St or partnering clinic;
- age greater than 18 years;
- ability to read, speak, and write English;
- diagnosed with a chronic, non-cancer-based painful medical condition;
- ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy;
- diagnosis of a cancer-based painful medical condition;
- any other medical or psychiatric condition that the PI or Co-PI physician of record determine might compromise safe study participation (including but not limited to active psychosis, history of frequent psychiatric hospitalizations, severe anxiety with claustrophobia, aggression)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single arm pain treatment
Arm includes usual pain care plus the chosen two telehealth interventions x 6 weeks
|
Participant selects from telehealth consultation on massage therapy, yoga therapy, chiropractic and physical therapies.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Rating
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Full scale name is PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Pain Intensity Scale version 3a that measures the construct pain intensity or severity in three items for how much it hurts on average, at its worst and at its least in the past 7 days.
Scale ranges from minimum "no pain" =1 to maximum "very severe" =5 pain with a possible sum of 3-15.
A total sum of the 3 items is converted into a T-score where 50 is equivalent to the U.S. general population average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation.
Higher values are considered to be a worse outcome (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
|
6 weeks
|
|
PROMIS Pain Interference Rating
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Scale name is PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Pain Interference Scale that measures the construct pain interference in 8 items for how much pain interferes with a variety of activities in the past 7 days.
Scale ranges from minimum "not at all" =1 to maximum "very much" =5 pain with a possible sum of 8-40.
A total sum of the 8 items is converted into a T-score where 50 is equivalent to the U.S. general population average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation.
Higher values are considered to be a worse outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Current Opioid Misuse Measure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
17-item scale to ask about use of opioids (range 0-64 with higher scores indicating more misuse)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Spiritual Well-being Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
4-items to ask about spiritual well-being (range 4-20 with higher scores indicating more spiritual well-being)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Depressive Symptoms Using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) 8-item scale with score range 0-24 (higher score is worsened depressive symptoms)
|
6 weeks
|
|
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Symptoms Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Self-efficacy self-report (range 4-20 with higher score better symptom management self-efficacy).
Scores converted into T scores with 50 as the average for US adults and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation.
Higher values are considered to be a better outcome (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
|
6 weeks
|
|
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Self-efficacy self-report (range 4-20 ).
Converted to T score where 50 equals the US adults average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation.
Higher values are considered to be a better outcome for self-efficacy for managing emotions (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
|
6 weeks
|
|
Anxiety Using Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
7-item scale with score range 0-21 (higher score is worsened anxiety)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
9-item scale asking how one feels about others score range 0-28 (lower score indicates more unmet interpersonal needs)
|
6 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Attendance in Scheduled Telehealth Sessions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Percentage of scheduled telehealth sessions attended by participants (calculated as total number attended/total number scheduled)
|
6 weeks
|
|
IBM Computer Usability and Satisfaction Questionnaires
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The IBM Computer Usability and Satisfaction Questionnaires was adapted to measure tele-visit program usability and satisfaction with a 4-item survey to gauge participant satisfaction with the intervention using 1-7 Likert scale.
A total mean satisfaction rating was generated from the combined mean 4 satisfaction items (possible mean range 1-7 where higher score means higher satisfaction) on a Likert-style scale: The Likert-style scale for each item was: 1: Strongly disagree- 7: Strongly agree where higher numbers indicate greater satisfaction.
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 10, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 3, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
January 3, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 15, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
October 28, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
October 6, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 16, 2025
Last Verified
September 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18111
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on Non-pharmacological pain treatment
-
Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research FoundationTerminatedLow Back Pain | Musculoskeletal Pain | Neck Pain | Pain, ChronicUnited States
-
Slagelse HospitalOdense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; Region Zealand; Danish...Completed
-
Jaseng Hospital of Korean MedicineCompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Radiculopathy LumbarKorea, Republic of
-
New Ismailia National UniversityRecruitingPainful Menstruation | Relaxation; Back LigamentsEgypt, Jordan
-
Comenius UniversityActive, not recruitingInfant, NewbornSlovakia
-
Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe de SevillaNot yet recruitingQuality of Life | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Patient Empowerment | Sensitization, CentralSpain
-
Duke UniversityNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedLow Back Pain | Veterans FamilyUnited States
-
Jaseng Medical FoundationRecruitingLumbar Disc HerniationSouth Korea
-
Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinNot yet recruitingPalliative Care | Cancer PainBrazil
-
Jaseng Hospital of Korean MedicineKorea Institute of Oriental MedicineCompletedLumbar Disc Prolapse With RadiculopathyKorea, Republic of