Community-Engaged Options to Facilitate Opioid Reduction (COMFORT)

September 16, 2025 updated by: Marian Wilson, Washington State University

Community-Engaged Options to Maximize and Facilitate Opioid Reduction Through Treatment

This study investigates how adults prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain respond to invitations to try non-opioid options of massage therapy, yoga therapy, chiropractic and physical therapies. Options will be available via telehealth consultation visits using a computer or smartphone with internet connection. The investigators will measure effects on pain, pain-related symptoms, and opioid use over time using a single-group design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Participants will be recruited from local primary care practices and asked to complete a baseline survey. They will then meet with a registered nurse via teleconference for a complete pain assessment. At the end of the session, participants will be asked to choose two of four available modalities for telehealth consultation. Participants will be scheduled for six telehealth sessions, once per week x six weeks with three consultations per each chosen therapy. Measurements of pain, mood, sleep, medicine use will be captured at baseline, three weeks and six weeks and examined for changes over time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99201
        • Community Health Association of Spokane
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99201
        • Washington State University College of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • enrollment in treatment at the CHAS Perry St or partnering clinic;
  • age greater than 18 years;
  • ability to read, speak, and write English;
  • diagnosed with a chronic, non-cancer-based painful medical condition;
  • ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy;
  • diagnosis of a cancer-based painful medical condition;
  • any other medical or psychiatric condition that the PI or Co-PI physician of record determine might compromise safe study participation (including but not limited to active psychosis, history of frequent psychiatric hospitalizations, severe anxiety with claustrophobia, aggression)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single arm pain treatment
Arm includes usual pain care plus the chosen two telehealth interventions x 6 weeks
Participant selects from telehealth consultation on massage therapy, yoga therapy, chiropractic and physical therapies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Rating
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Full scale name is PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Pain Intensity Scale version 3a that measures the construct pain intensity or severity in three items for how much it hurts on average, at its worst and at its least in the past 7 days. Scale ranges from minimum "no pain" =1 to maximum "very severe" =5 pain with a possible sum of 3-15. A total sum of the 3 items is converted into a T-score where 50 is equivalent to the U.S. general population average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation. Higher values are considered to be a worse outcome (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
6 weeks
PROMIS Pain Interference Rating
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Scale name is PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Pain Interference Scale that measures the construct pain interference in 8 items for how much pain interferes with a variety of activities in the past 7 days. Scale ranges from minimum "not at all" =1 to maximum "very much" =5 pain with a possible sum of 8-40. A total sum of the 8 items is converted into a T-score where 50 is equivalent to the U.S. general population average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation. Higher values are considered to be a worse outcome.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current Opioid Misuse Measure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
17-item scale to ask about use of opioids (range 0-64 with higher scores indicating more misuse)
6 weeks
Spiritual Well-being Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
4-items to ask about spiritual well-being (range 4-20 with higher scores indicating more spiritual well-being)
6 weeks
Depressive Symptoms Using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) 8-item scale with score range 0-24 (higher score is worsened depressive symptoms)
6 weeks
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Symptoms Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self-efficacy self-report (range 4-20 with higher score better symptom management self-efficacy). Scores converted into T scores with 50 as the average for US adults and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation. Higher values are considered to be a better outcome (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
6 weeks
PROMIS Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self-efficacy self-report (range 4-20 ). Converted to T score where 50 equals the US adults average and + /- 10 points is equivalent to the standard deviation. Higher values are considered to be a better outcome for self-efficacy for managing emotions (range 40-70 after T-score conversion).
6 weeks
Anxiety Using Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
7-item scale with score range 0-21 (higher score is worsened anxiety)
6 weeks
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
9-item scale asking how one feels about others score range 0-28 (lower score indicates more unmet interpersonal needs)
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Attendance in Scheduled Telehealth Sessions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Percentage of scheduled telehealth sessions attended by participants (calculated as total number attended/total number scheduled)
6 weeks
IBM Computer Usability and Satisfaction Questionnaires
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The IBM Computer Usability and Satisfaction Questionnaires was adapted to measure tele-visit program usability and satisfaction with a 4-item survey to gauge participant satisfaction with the intervention using 1-7 Likert scale. A total mean satisfaction rating was generated from the combined mean 4 satisfaction items (possible mean range 1-7 where higher score means higher satisfaction) on a Likert-style scale: The Likert-style scale for each item was: 1: Strongly disagree- 7: Strongly agree where higher numbers indicate greater satisfaction.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Non-pharmacological pain treatment

Subscribe