Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-pharmacological Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation : A Pilot Study

September 26, 2022 updated by: Kyoung Sun Park, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
This is a 2-arm parallel pragmatic randomized controlled trial that will compare non-pharmacological treatment with pharmacological therapy for lumbar disc herniation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants who voluntarily signed informed consent form and eligible for the study were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio (15:15) for non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment group. Participants of each group will receive twice a week for total 8 weeks of intervention. This is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, so physicians will have medical decision making according to each participant's conditions and choose the specific intervention and dosage of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of radiating pain 5 or more for recent 3 serial days.
  2. Onset time of radiating pain occurred within 12 weeks.
  3. Radiologically diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (L-spine MRI)
  4. 19-70 years old
  5. participants who agreed and signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Spine metastasis of cancer, acute fracture of spine, or spine dislocation
  2. Progressive neurologic deficits or severe neurologic deficits
  3. Soft tissue diseases that can induce low back pain(ie. cancer, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, gout,etc)
  4. Presence of chronic underlying disease which can interfere the efficacy or interpretation (ie. stroke, myocardial infarct, kidney disease, dementia, diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, etc)
  5. Concurrent use of steroids, immunosuppressants, orpsychotropic medications or any other medication that can interrupt the study result
  6. Hemorrhagic disease, severe diabetes or taking anticoagulant drug
  7. Participants who took NSAIDs or pharmacopuncture within 1 week
  8. Pregnant or lactating women
  9. Participants who had undergone lumbar surgery within 3 months
  10. Participants who had participated in other clinical trial within 1 month, or have plan for participation in other trial during follow up period of this trial
  11. Participants who can not write informed consent
  12. Participants who is difficult to participate in the trial according to investigator's decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KM non-pharmacological treatment group
Non-pharmacological treatment including Korean medicine will be implemented to the participants twice a week for total 8 weeks. The specific intervention will be determined according to the physician's choice, and information will be recorded in the case report form.
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. Non-pharmacological treatment including Korean medicine, such as acupuncture, electroacupuncture and chuna, etc, will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.
Active Comparator: Pharmacological treatment group
Pharmacological treatment will be implemented to the participants twice a week for total 8 weeks. The specific intervention will be determined according to the physician's choice, and information will be recorded in the case report form.
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. The pharmacological treatment will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities
Time Frame: week 9
NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
week 9

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
The EQ-5D-5L consists of 5 questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, anxiety/depression) that ask about the current state of health, and answers each question with 5 likert. (1=I have no problems about, 2=I have slight problems about, 3=I have moderate problems about, 4=I have severe problems about, 5=I am unable to about)
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of low-back pain
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg radiating pain
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale of radiating leg pain, minimum 0 to maximum 100,which is a higher score means a worse outcome.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low-back pain
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale of radiating leg pain, minimum 0 to maximum 100,which is a higher score means a worse outcome.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
ODI is a functional disability questionnaire. The possible range of eachitem score is 0 to 5. Total score range is 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worse outcome)
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: week 1, 9, 14, 27
FABQ is one of pateint-reported outcome questionnaire which consists of total 16 questions. Through FABQ, the investigator can evaluate fear avoidance responses, especially in physical and occupational activity domain for patients with low-back pain
week 1, 9, 14, 27
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: week 9, 14, 27
Participants rate the improvement after treatment on a 7-point Likert scale(1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, nochange; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.)
week 9, 14, 27
Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
The SF-12 consists of 12 questions across 8 domains, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyoung Sun Park, KMD,Ph.D, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Prolapse With Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on KM non-pharmacological treatment group

3
Subscribe