Non-pharmacological Treatment and Pharmacological Treatment for Non-acute Lumbar Disc Herniation

May 25, 2023 updated by: Kyoung Sun Park, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine

Comparative Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Treatment and Pharmacological Treatment for Non-acute Lumbar Disc Herniation : a Multi-centered, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled, Parallel-grouped Pilot Study

This study is a 2-armed parallel, multi-centered, pragmatic clinical trial that compares the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment for non-acute lumbar disc herniation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-centered, pragmatic clinical trial that compares the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment for non-acute lumbar disc herniation. The participants who voluntarily signed informed consent will be randomly assigned in 1:2 ratio to non-pharmacological group and pharmacological group and will receive the 8 weeks of intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • Haeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
    • Gyeonggi Province
      • Bucheon, Gyeonggi Province, Korea, Republic of, 14598
        • Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of radiating pain or low back pain 5 or more for recent 3 serial days.
  2. Onset time of radiating pain occurred 3 months before enrollment.
  3. Radiologically diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (L-spine MRI), which can explain lower extremity radiation pain and back pain
  4. 19-69 years old
  5. participants who agreed and signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Spine metastasis of cancer, acute fracture of spine, or spine dislocation
  2. Progressive neurologic deficits or severe neurologic deficits
  3. Soft tissue diseases that can induce low back pain(ie. cancer, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, gout,etc)
  4. Presence of chronic underlying disease which can interfere the efficacy or interpretation (ie. stroke, myocardial infarct, kidney disease, dementia, diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, etc)
  5. Concurrent use of steroids, immunosuppressants, orpsychotropic medications or any other medication that can interrupt the study result
  6. Hemorrhagic disease, severe diabetes or taking anticoagulant drug
  7. Participants who took NSAIDs within 1 week
  8. Pregnant or lactating women
  9. Participants who had undergone lumbar surgery within 3 months
  10. Participants who had participated in other clinical trial within 1 month, or have plan for participation in other trial during follow up period of this trial
  11. Participants who can not write informed consent
  12. Participants who is difficult to participate in the trial according to investigator's decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-pharmacological group including KM
Non-pharmacological treatment including Korean medicine will be implemented to the participants for total 8 weeks. This is a pragmatic clinical trial, and the specific intervention will be determined according to the physician's choice. intervention data will be recorded in the case report form.
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. Non-pharmacological treatment including Korean medicine, such as acupuncture, electroacupuncture and chuna, etc, will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.
Active Comparator: Pharmacological group
Pharmacological treatment will be implemented to the participants for total 8 weeks. This is a pragmatic clinical trial, and the specific intervention will be determined according to the physician's choice. intervention data will be recorded in the case report form.
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. The pharmacological treatment will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry disability index (ODI)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
ODI is a functional disability questionnaire. The possible range of eachitem score is 0 to 5. Total score range is 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worse outcome)
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of low back pain
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as a whole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and 10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and radiating pain in lower extermities
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Visual analogue scale of low back pain and radiating leg pain, minimum 0 to maximum 100,which is a higher score means a worse outcome.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities
Time Frame: week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as a whole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and 10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Patient global impression of change (PGIC)
Time Frame: week 9, 14, 27
Participants rate the global impression of improvement after treatment on a 7-point Likert scale.
week 9, 14, 27
Short form-12 health survey version 2 (SF-12 v2)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
The SF-12 consists of 12 questions across 8 domains, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
The EQ-5D-5L consists of 5 questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, anxiety/depression) that ask about the current state of health, and answers each question with 5 likert. (1=I have no problems about, 2=I have slight problems about, 3=I have moderate problems about, 4=I have severe problems about, 5=I am unable to about)
week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
Credibility and Expectancy
Time Frame: week -1
To evaluate participants' expectations for treatment, the nine-point scale(Likert scale) is used to evaluate them. During the screening visit, the candidates will choose their scores in response to the question, "How much do you think non-drug therapy, including Korean medical treatment, or medication will relieve your symptoms?" (1 = not at all, 5 = somewhat, and 9 = very much)
week -1
Evaluation question
Time Frame: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Use a questionnaire that measures official unofficial medical expenses, non-medical expenses, time costs, and productivity loss costs developed separately to measure cost items. Informal medical expenses, such as purchasing pars or medical devices, include transportation, patient time, transportation, patient time, and nursing costs are non-medical expenses. Productivity loss costs refer to the cost of economic loss caused by the disease itself or by the inability to participate in labor due to premature death from the disease. To calculate the cost of productivity loss, we will use the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnair (WPAI) to convert it into cost-effectiveness analysis.
week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Drug Consumption
Time Frame: week -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
The type and dose of prescribed drugs or relief drugs due to the active history of drugs taken during the study period are observed through a questionnaire when visiting the study subjects. Other than the medication you are taking, physical therapy, injection therapy, etc. should be recorded in the number of times.
week -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Adverse events
Time Frame: week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27
Safety will be verified by comparing the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. The researcher evaluates each treatment method and its adverse events on a six-step scale according to the WHO-UMC UMC causality assessment system (1=definitive linked, 2=provocatively linked, 4=probably not related, 5=definitive not related, 5=definitive not related to the study), and all adverse events are classified into three stages by the Spilker taxonomy (Mild(1)): If treatment is not required and does not significantly impair the normal life function, Moderate(2): may significantly impair normal life function, and may require treatment, and Severe(3): severe adverse events require high treatment, and side effects remain.
week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyoung Sun Park, Ph.D, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on non-pharmacological treatment

3
Subscribe