Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes

February 25, 2025 updated by: Oliver Bichsel, ETH Zurich
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a gold-standard symptomatic treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) and is also explored for a variety of other neurological disorders. The implantation of electrodes into deep brain areas has not only enabled the application of electrical stimuli, but has also provided researchers and clinicians with an unprecedented window to investigate aberrant neuronal activity right at the core of pathological brain circuits. Local field potentials (LFP) have already been readily investigated through externalised DBS electrode wires prior to internalisation and connection to an implantable neurostimulator. In the case of PD, motor symptoms have been evidenced to correlate with exaggerated beta oscillatory activity (13-35 Hz) in the LFP recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Firstly, beta activity recorded in the STN at rest in patients withdrawn from their medication has been correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) across patients. Secondly, a reduction of signal power in the beta-band was correlated with clinical improvements of motor symptoms. Thirdly, the two main therapeutic strategies, the administration of L-Dopa, and high-frequency DBS both lead to a suppression of beta-synchronicity in the STN. Furthermore, beta-oscillations show fast and movement-dependent modulation over time and can serve as a biomarker and feedback signal to control the delivery of DBS. The investigators recently implemented deep brain electrical neurofeedback to provide real-time visual neurofeedback of pathological STN oscillations through externalised DBS electrodes and showed that PD patients were able to volitionally control and reduce subthalamic activity within a single 1 hour session. Moreover, neurofeedback-learnt strategies accelerated movements and could be retained in the short- and mid-term. Only recently, a newly developed neurostimulator, the Percept™ PC (Medtronic Neurological Division, Minneapolis, MN, USA), has been clinically approved, which can not only apply electrical impulses, but also enable the measurement and transmission of brain activity. This neurostimulator is now the first choice for implantations at the University Hospital Zurich and is used for a variety of neurological disorders. The investigators' goal is to investigate whether neurofeedback through a fully implanted deep brain stimulation device is possible and can lead to a better control of pathological oscillations as well as symptom mitigation. Having shown that endogenous control over deep brain oscillations is possible, the investigators will also test this novel therapeutic approach for pathologies other than PD that are also treated with DBS. Neurofeedback using implanted DBS electrodes will have the advantage of enabling longer and multiple-day training sessions, which the investigators hypothesise to have a larger impact on control over pathological deep brain oscillations and neurological symptoms, as such a fully implanted neurofeedback system no longer requires the externalisation of DBS wires and is as such no longer limited to the first two days after electrode implantation. All in all, the investigators will not exceed a total streaming time of 7 hours per patients (7 d of battery time), which the investigators deem justifiable with respect to a battery life of > 5 years. This proposed research is highly significant as it will help our understanding of various neurological diseases that are highly prevalent in society (PD being, for instance, the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease) and might culminate in novel, endogenous treatment strategies. The overall risk for patients is minimal to non-existent, as stimulation parameters are unaffected and the intended changes in brain activity are self-induced while DBS stimulation is off.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

patients undergoing clinically indicated implantation of a Percept™ PC neurostimulator, age ≥ 18 years as well as planned hospitalisation of ≥ 3 days after operation

Exclusion Criteria:

minimal prognosticated survival of less than 1 year, reduced state of consciousness (i. e. Glasgow Coma Scale < 15), inability to communicate (in terms of hearing, seeing, speaking and understanding), other significant concomitant diseases (e. g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, isolation), inability to follow procedures, insufficient knowledge of project language, inability to give consent and unlikeliness to follow protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bidirectional Neurofeedback
Behavioral: Neurofeedback
Modulating brain oscillations based on visual neurofeedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of endogenous neuromodulation (difference in oscillatory power)
Time Frame: 60 Minutes
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation). Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].
60 Minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
performance in motor activity tasks
Time Frame: 60 min
The investigators will assess the 'performance in motor activity tasks' (= name of the measurement) using the measurement tools of wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and motion detectors. The following units of measure (physiological parameters) could be extracted from the recorded data: speed of movement, smoothness of movement, extent of movement.
60 min
transfer of neurofeedback-learnt strategies
Time Frame: 60 min
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation) in the ABSENCE of active neurofeedback. Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].
60 min
agency as measured on a visual scale (1-10)
Time Frame: 60 min
the subjectively perceived ability to control deep brain oscillatory activity. Patients will be asked to indicate the perceived ability (agency) to control the neurofeedback parameter on a visual scale from 0 (no control) to 10 (perfect control).
60 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

ETH Zurich

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH, ETH Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 23, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NF-DBS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe