Financial Toxicity in Breast Cancer Surgery

June 12, 2025 updated by: McMaster University

Financial Toxicity in Surgical Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate financial toxicity, or financial harm, in breast cancer patients. The study will follow patients throughout their cancer treatment. The study investigators will measure if patients are experiencing financial toxicity and if it changes throughout treatment, and whether it's associated with different cancers, treatments, or demographics. Also, the study investigators will measure if financial toxicity impacts other areas of life (e.g., well-being, satisfaction). Finally, patients will be asked to estimate how much money they expect to spend on out-of-pocket expenses during their treatment and how their finances and employment status have changed since their cancer diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

One in three breast cancer patients experiences treatment-related, cost-associated distress. This financial harm is termed "financial toxicity" (FT). FT is the strongest independent risk factor for diminished quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among cancer patients. The present study will be the first prospective cohort study examining FT in breast cancer patients in Canada, or any other publicly-funded healthcare system.

The primary objective is to detect the prevalence and trajectory of FT using a validated instrument and its association with patient and treatment-related characteristics. The secondary objective is to assess the effects of financial toxicity on patient-reported quality of life, well-being, and satisfaction. The tertiary objective is to assess patients' baseline cost expectations for reconstructive surgery, actual out-of-pocket spending, private insurance or workplace benefits expenditure, and employment status, over the course of treatment.

Participants will be recruited at their consultation with the general surgeon, will consent to be observed for up to 1 year and be asked to complete a series of validated questionnaires, at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

The primary outcome is financial toxicity (FT), assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST), a validated patient-reported outcome measure that uses a 12 item, five-point Likert scale type.

The secondary outcomes include (1) well-being and satisfaction, as measured by the BREAST-Q, (2) quality of life as measured by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (12-SF), (3) patient-level (age, co-morbidities, stage, socioeconomic status) and treatment-associated (complications, type of breast surgery, decision to have reconstruction, type of reconstruction), and (4) baseline cost expectations, out-of-pocket spending, private insurance or workplace benefits expenditure, and employment status, over the course of treatment.

Multivariate regression will be used to identify patient and treatment level factors associated with financial toxicity. First, the association between the COST scores and each survey question response, patient characteristic, and treatment factor will be determined. A stepwise linear regression will be completed with backward elimination to generate a list of co-variates based on their significance level. All variables in the final selected model has a significance level < 0.1. Other data will be characterized the study samples by presenting the means, standard deviations, and medians for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

630

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Juravinski Hospital
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or risk reduction (e.g., BRCA) including both breast conservation or mastectomy, with or without reconstruction.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Have an indication for surgical treatment of breast cancer
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Able to understand and communicate in English
  • Have access to email and internet and are able to fill out an electronic survey

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients will be excluded if they have recurrent or metastatic disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Breast conserving surgery only
Patients who receive breast conserving surgery.
Mastectomy only
Patients who receive mastectomy surgery.
Mastectomy & breast reconstruction
Patients who receive mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Financial Toxicity (FT)
Time Frame: 12 months
FT will be assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). The COST measure is an 11-item cancer-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Each item is scored on a 0 to 4-point Likert scale, where a lower total score represents greater financial distress.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Financial Toxicity (FT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
FT will be assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). The COST measure is an 11-item cancer-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Each item is scored on a 0 to 4-point Likert scale, where a lower total score represents greater financial distress.
Baseline, 6 months
Satisfaction with Breasts
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
This will be measured using the BREAST-Q questionnaire; Satisfaction with Breast Module. All questions are answered on Likert scales (scored 1-4). This module varies based on the type of breast surgery the patient underwent (mastectomy only, breast conserving surgery, or reconstruction). The answers of this section are totalled and compared to the equivalent Rasch transformed score. Zero represents the worst possible score and 100 represents the best.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Psychosocial Well-Being
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
This will be measured using the BREAST-Q questionnaire; Psychosocial Well-Being Module. All questions are answered on Likert scales (scored 1-5). The answers this section are totalled and compared to the equivalent Rasch transformed score. Zero represents the worst possible score and 100 represents the best.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Satisfaction with Surgeon
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
This will be measured using the BREAST-Q questionnaire; Satisfaction with Surgeon Module. All questions are answered on Likert scales (scored 0-4). The answers this section are totalled and compared to the equivalent Rasch transformed score. Zero represents the worst possible score and 100 represents the best.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of Life (mental and physical health)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of life, will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (12-SF) that evaluates overall physical and mental health. The SF-12 is a general health patient-reported outcome measure that has 12 items, is reported 0 to 100 for two domains. Higher scores represent better quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher J Coroneos, MD, MSc, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe