Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for Rescuing Patients With Graft Failure (HaploRescue)

November 8, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for Rescuing Patients With Graft Failure: a Phase II Study

Prognosis of patients with graft failure is dismal, and re-transplantation is the sole option for long-term survival. Currently, there is no consensus concerning therapeutic options in patients with primary or secondary (within the 60 days post-transplantation) graft failure and finding a new donor within an acceptable delay is challenging. Literature is poor on the subject while the overall survival of such patients is about 30% at 1 year. This situation thus represents today a very challenging unmet medical need.

Recently, haploidentical (haplo) related donor Stem Cell Transplantation (haplo-SCT) have improved dramatically outcomes using T-cell replete grafts with administration of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy, which targets alloreactive T cells generated early after an HLA-mismatched transplant, sparing regulatory T cells and leaving unaffected the non-dividing hematopoietic stem cells) and standard post-transplant immune suppression with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil. Our group re-transplanted a patient who experienced two consecutive graft failures and was successfully managed through a third haplo-SCT from her son using PTCy. We then retrospectively collected and analyzed data from 26 primary graft failure patients transplanted between 2011 and 2017 in 15 centers on behalf of French Society for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy (SFGM-TC). The study population consisted mainly of patients with primary or secondary (within the 60 days post-transplantation) graft failure who underwent haplo-SCT and received PTCy as graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis. The 1-year overall survival was about 60% suggesting that this approach might be a valid option in this particular poor clinical situation but now need validation through a phase II multicenter, national, prospective cohort study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged from 3 to 70 years
  • All hematological diseases
  • Suffering from primary or secondary (within the 60 days post-transplantation) graft failure after a 1st allo-SCT
  • With usual criteria for allo-SCT:

    • ECOG ≤ 2
    • No severe and uncontrolled infection
    • Cardiac function compatible with high dose of cyclophosphamide
    • Adequate organ function: ASAT and ALAT ≤ 2.5N, total bilirubin ≤ 2N, creatinine clearance ≥30ml / min
  • With identification of a haploidentical donor (brother, sister, parents, adult children or cousin)
  • Absence of donor specific antibody (DSA) detected in the patient with a MFI ≥ 1500 (antibodies directed towards the distinct haplotype between donor and recipient)
  • With health insurance coverage (bénéficiaire ou ayant droit).
  • Understand informed consent or optimal treatment and follow-up.
  • Contraception methods must be prescribed during all the duration of the research. Women and men of childbearing age must use contraceptive methods within 12 months and 6 months after the last dose of cyclophosphamide, respectively.
  • Having signed a written informed consent (2 parents for patients aged less than 18)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged< 3 years old and >70 years old
  • With uncontrolled infection
  • With Seropositivity for HIV or HTLV-1 or active hepatitis B or C defined by a positive PCR HBV or HCV and associated hepatic cytolysis
  • Yellow fever vaccine within 2 months before transplantation
  • Cancer in the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or "in situ" carcinoma of the cervix)
  • Uncontrolled coronary insufficiency, recent myocardial infarction <6 month, current manifestations of heart failure, uncontrolled cardiac rhythm disorders, ventricular ejection fraction <50%
  • Heart failure according to NYHA (II or more)
  • Preexisting acute hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 30ml / min
  • Urinary tract obstruction
  • Pregnant (β-HCG positive) or breast-feeding
  • Who have any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness, which preclude understanding the inform consent as well as optimal treatment and follow-up
  • COVID vaccination or recent COVID disease <3 months
  • Tutorship or curatorship
  • Contraindications to treatments used during the research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: haplo-SCT with PTCy
haploidentical (haplo) related donor Stem Cell Transplantation (haplo-SCT) with administration of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy, which targets alloreactive T cells generated early after an HLA-mismatched transplant, sparing regulatory T cells and leaving unaffected the non-dividing hematopoietic stem cells)

Conditioning regimen Fludarabine (30mg/m2/day from day -6 to day -4), Cyclophosphamide (14.5 mg/kg/day at day -6 and day -5) except for patients who received a total dose of Cyclophosphamide >100mg/Kg during the first Bone Marrow Transplantation Total Body Irradiation (2 Gray on day -1).

Source of stem cell source Peripheral blood stem cell Minimal target dose of 4.106 CD34+ cells/kg of recipient

GvHD prophylaxis Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/Kg/day at D+3 and D+4 Ciclosporine from day+5 (residual 200 à 300ng/l) Mycophenolate mofetyl at 15mg/Kg x2/day from day+5

Prevention of EBV reactivation Rituximab : 150mg/m2 intravenously at Day+5 post Haplo-SCT Each infusion of Rituximab will be preceded by administration of anti-pyretic and an antihistaminic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: at one year
at one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Neutrophils engraftment
Time Frame: at day 100
3 consecutive days with neutrophiles >0.5 G/L
at day 100
Platelets engraftment
Time Frame: at day 100
7 consecutive days with platelets >20 G/L
at day 100
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 2 months
at 2 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Relapse incidence
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Relapse incidence
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Progression free survival
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Incidence of cardiac toxicities
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Graft failure incidence
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: at one month
at one month
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: at 2 months
at 2 months
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Absolute number of platelets
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of use of growth factors for poor hematopoietic reconstitution
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Acute GvHD incidence
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Chronic GvHD incidence
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Incidence of CMV infection
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of EBV infection
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of severe infections
Time Frame: at 3 months
Severe infections are defined as CTAE grade of 3 or 4
at 3 months
Incidence of severe infections
Time Frame: at 6 months
Severe infections are defined as CTAE grade of 3 or 4
at 6 months
Incidence of severe infections
Time Frame: at 12 months
Severe infections are defined as CTAE grade of 3 or 4
at 12 months
Incidence of severe infections
Time Frame: at 24 months
Severe infections are defined as CTAE grade of 3 or 4
at 24 months
Incidence of veino-occlusive disease (VOD)
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Severity of veino-occlusive disease (VOD)
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Interval between first allo-SCT and rescue haplo-SCT
Time Frame: at 60 days
at 60 days
Quality of life for adults
Time Frame: at 3 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adults using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 3 months
Quality of life for adults
Time Frame: at 6 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adults using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 6 months
Quality of life for adults
Time Frame: at 12 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adults using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 12 months
Quality of life for adults
Time Frame: at 24 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adults using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 24 months
Quality of life for minors
Time Frame: at 3 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning
at 3 months
Quality of life for minors
Time Frame: at 6 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning
at 6 months
Quality of life for minors
Time Frame: at 12 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning
at 12 months
Quality of life for minors
Time Frame: at 24 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning
at 24 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 3 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution will be defined by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 3 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 6 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution will be defined by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 6 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 12 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution will be defined by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 12 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 24 months post-transplantation
Immune reconstitution will be defined by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 24 months post-transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP200129

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on haplo-SCT with PTCy

3
Subscribe