Hip Osteoarthritis and Foot Orthoses Trial (HOOT) (HOOT)

October 9, 2023 updated by: La Trobe University

Hip Osteoarthritis and Foot Orthoses Trial (HOOT): A Randomized Feasibility Trial

This trial is a randomized feasibility trial to determine the feasibility of comparing two different shoe inserts and on pain, quality of life and physical activity associated with hip osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized to one of two groups - contoured prefabricated foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts (the comparator). Participants will be asked to use the inserts daily for a six week period. Adherence to the intervention will be monitored using a daily diary, as well as adverse events and co-interventions. The primary outcome is feasibility domains (Demand, Implementation, Acceptability, Practicality) with secondary outcomes of change in hip-related pain and quality of life and physical activity levels. The primary time-point will be 6-weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Victoria
      • Bundoora, Victoria, Australia, 3086
        • Recruiting
        • La Trobe University
        • Contact:
          • Adam I Semciw, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Primary symptomatic and radiographic hip OA, in accordance with the American College of Rheumatology

(i) aged > 45 years;

(ii) pain in the hip or groin for more than 3 months;

(iii) average pain intensity over the past week of > 3 out of 10 (Numerical Rating Scale) during functional tasks like walking, climbing stairs or climbing in/out of a car;

(iv) radiographic confirmation of hip osteoarthritis with a Kellgren-Lawrence score ≥ 2 within the last 12 months;

(v) mild to moderate disability indicated by;

  1. able to reciprocally ascend and descend 10 stairs unaided,
  2. able to safely walk one city block, and
  3. able to jog five meters if required

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) other musculoskeletal lower limb or back conditions requiring assessment or treatment by a health professional (Doctor, Physiotherapist, Podiatrist etc) in the last 6 months;

(ii) have received active treatment for their hip pain by a health professional (eg physiotherapist) in the last 3 months;

(iii) history of hip trauma or surgery on the affected side;

(iv) corticosteroid use (oral or intra-articular injection) in the past 3 months

(v) neurological impairment or condition affecting lower limb function

(vi) conditions or factors affecting ability to take part in the intervention, e.g., unavailable for a 6 week intervention period, routine use of gait aids, uncontrolled hypertension, or morbid obesity (body mass index > 40);

(vii) Use of foot orthoses in the previous 12 months

(viii) systemic inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis);

(ix) unable to write, read or comprehend English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Foot orthoses

Manufacturer: Foot Science International.

Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density)

Arch support: inbuilt.

Covering: fabric

Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist > 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm.

Where: Administered via telehealth

When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required

Tailoring: Orthoses are fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional.

Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)

Other Names:
  • Foot Science International Ltd; Formthotic
Sham Comparator: Flat shoe insert

Manufacturer: Foot Science International.

Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density)

Arch support: no.

Covering: fabric

Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist > 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm.

Where: Administered via telehealth

When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required

Tailoring: Fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional.

Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: adherence
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Recruitment rate (average 1 participant per week); 50% log-book completion rate (daily); drop-out <20%; 35 hours per week adherence to intervention (log book)
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip-related pain
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: pain sub-scale (HOOS-12). Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip-related physical function
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: function and daily living subscale. Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
hip osteoarthritis outcome score: quality of life subscale: Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Baseline and 6 weeks
Fear of movement
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Brief Fear of Movement Scale for osteoarthritis (BFOM); 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating lower fear of movement (better score)
Baseline and 6 weeks
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire -9: Scored from 0 to 27, participants can be classified as having mild (≥ 5), moderate (≥ 10), moderately severe (≥ 15) and severe (≥ 20) depressive symptoms.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Physical activity- Self-reported
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Participants will be asked to recall their physical activity over the last 7 days with regard to vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, walking and sitting.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Physical activity- Walking based physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Will be measured with a tri-axial accelerometer-based activity monitor that is attached on the thigh (activPAL model 4 micro; PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK) and will be expressed as a) daily minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity using the established 100 steps/minute threshold and b) total daily steps (which captures both inside and outside the home walking activity).
Baseline and 6 weeks
Global rating of change- Physical activity
Time Frame: Week 6
Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse
Week 6
Global rating of change- Symptoms
Time Frame: Week 6
Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Semciw, PhD, La Trobe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HOOT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Foot orthoses

Subscribe