The Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Rebound Pain After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery

The Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Rebound Pain After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The rebound pain after nerve block could interfere with the patient's recovery and rehabilitation. It is not known how intravenous dexamethasone affects rebound pain. This study aims to evaluate the effect of intravenous dexamethasone on rebound pain after interscalene block for shoulder surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Shoulder rotator cuff repair and acromioplasty are associated with severe postoperative pain. The interscalene block (ISB) is commonly used for this type of surgery, providing analgesia by anesthetizing the nerves that supply the shoulder. Although the nerve block provides extremely effective analgesia for the first 6-8 hours, patients experience severe pain once its effect has been wearing off. Rebound pain is a severe pain that occurs when the effect of a nerve block disappears in a patient during the postoperative period. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of intravenous dexamethasone reduces rebound pain in patients recruiting for shoulder surgery with interscalene brachial plexus blockade.

This study will be conducted as a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial in a university hospital. Patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery will be screened for enrollment in the study. All subjects will undergo ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block before induction of general anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned into the two groups which use intravenous dexamethasone or not. An anesthesiologist who will perform blocks will not involve in the data collection. Other health care workers who will involve in the evaluation of postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting, opioid consumption, quality of Sleep, and Quality of Recovery score will be blinded to the group assignment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karaman, Turkey, 70200
        • Karaman Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing shoulder surgery
  • Having signed a written informed consent form,
  • ASAI-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inadequate indication for interscalene block (Coagulation disorder, local infection of block site, Diaphragmatic paralysis, Allergy to local anesthetics)
  • Neuropathic disorder
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • Systemic steroid use
  • Chronic opioids use
  • Stomach ulcer
  • Ucontrolled Diabetes
  • Psychiatric disorders,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Severe obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Group C
The patients will be received an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block with 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.

Patients will receive 2 mg midazolam and 50 ug fentanyl for sedation before the block procedure. Each patient will be positioned appropriately, then a high-frequency linear array transducer (13-6 MHz) will be placed in the interscalene region to define the brachial plexus on the short axis. Under sterile conditions, a 50 mm block needle will be advanced into the interscalen area using the in-plane method. After localization and negative aspiration, 15 ML of 5% bupivacaine drug will be injected into the interscalene area. 100 ml of NACI will be given intravenously within 15 minutes.

General anesthesia will be performed using 2 mg/kg of propofol and 1-2 µg/kg of fentanyl. Tracheal intubation will be facilitated with 0.6mg/kg rocuronium. Anesthesia will be maintained using 50% oxygen and 2% sevoflurane. Patients will be extubated into the operating room after reversing residual muscle relaxation. A multimodal analgesia regimen will be applied postoperatively.

Experimental: Group Dex
The patients will be received an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block with 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 5 mg intravenous dexamethasone.

Patients will receive 2 mg midazolam and 50 ug fentanyl for sedation before the block procedure. Each patient will be positioned appropriately, then a high-frequency linear array transducer (13-6 MHz) will be placed in the interscalene region to define the brachial plexus on the short axis. Under sterile conditions, a 50 mm block needle will be advanced into the interscalene area using the in-plane method. After localization and negative aspiration, 15 ML of 5% bupivacaine drug will be injected into the interscalene area. 5 mg dexamethasone intravenously will be given in 100 ml NACI within 15 minutes.

General anesthesia will be performed using 2 mg/kg of propofol and 1-2 µg/kg of fentanyl. Tracheal intubation will be facilitated with 0.6mg/kg rocuronium. Anesthesia will be maintained using 50% oxygen and 2% sevoflurane. Patients will be extubated into the operating room after reversing residual muscle relaxation. A multimodal analgesia regimen will be applied postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference of pain score before and after interscalene block resolution
Time Frame: First 12 hours after interscalene block effect disappears
The difference in the pain score between when the block is working and when it has resolved. Pain scores (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable) using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10.
First 12 hours after interscalene block effect disappears
Incidence of rebound pain
Time Frame: One week after surgery
Rebound pain is described as severe pain (NRS ≥ 7)
One week after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glucose measurement
Time Frame: Postoperative 24th hour
Glucose measurement
Postoperative 24th hour
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Rescue analgesic consumption in the first 48 hours postoperatively will be recorded.
Postoperative 48 hours
Quality of Recovery 15 Score
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 and day 7
Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 survey.Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 150, higher scores mean better.
Postoperative day 1 and day 7
Numeric Rating Scale pain score ( NRS)
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Pain scores (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable) using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. It will be recorded at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 18th, and 24th hours in the postoperative period
Postoperative 48 hours
Interscalene block resolution time
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
The time of the first analgesic request. If the patient will not need analgesic, the block will be accepted as resolved when numbness or heaviness will not be felt by the patient.
Postoperative 24 hours
Number of Participants with Surgical infection
Time Frame: Postoperative 14 days
Number of Participants diagnosed with surgical infection
Postoperative 14 days
Sleep Quality measured with Likert Scale
Time Frame: One week after surgery
Patients' perceived sleep quality will be assessed with a Likert scale. Likert scale is scored from Likert scale where 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied.
One week after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Betül Başaran, MD,DESA, Karaman Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 07-2021/13

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rebound Pain

Clinical Trials on Group C

3
Subscribe