Physical and Cognitive Training System for Neurocognitive Protection and Enhancement in Older Adults

July 27, 2022 updated by: Lee Tih Shih, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

The Efficacy of a Novel Multimodal Personalized Physical and Cognitive Training System for Neurocognitive Protection and Enhancement in Older Adults

Neurocognitive decline is a health issue that is associated with ageing. It is often irreversible from the onset. The concomitant costs of neurocognitive decline could be potentially exponential if left unchecked. Therefore, there is a need to be able to delay the onset of age-related neurocognitive decline or possibly avoid it altogether. Previous studies have shown that there is a strong positive relationship between the fitness of neurocognitive function and cognitive training. More interestingly, recent studies also suggest that combining cognitive training with physical activity may result in a better outcome for neurocognitive function as compared to only cognitive training. Anchoring on the findings of those studies, the investigators aim to develop and evaluate the efficacy of a novel personalized multimodal brain computer interface (BCI) cognitive and physical training system for neurocognitive protection and enhancement in older adults. The current study employs a three-arm randomized-controlled trial approach. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the multimodal cognitive and physical training (mBCI) group will perform significantly better than the cognitive training-only BCI (nBCI) and active control (AC) groups on the Repeated Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) after an initial high-intensity 36 training session period from pre- to 12 weeks post-intervention. The investigators also hypothesize that the mBCI group will perform significantly better on the RBANS than nBCI or AC groups after the consecutive high- and low-intensity periods from pre- to 24-weeks post-intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neurocognitive decline is a health problem that is associated with ageing. More often than not, age-related cognitive decline may be indicative of the onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or even more severe neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease-both of which will eventually lead to dementia. Cognitive decline and neurocognitive disorders can often lead to the gross deterioration in one's quality of life. Depending on the severity and duration of the onset of the neurocognitive decline, patients may experience anything from forgetfulness or learning difficulties, to major issues such as a decreased capacity for decision-making, confusion, disorientation, communication problems, and social behavioral issues. All of these issues could impede one's ability to care for one's self, which may also lead to the increased reliance and burden on caretakers.

On a global scale, it is estimated that about 46.8 million people suffer from dementia or other dementia subtypes. That number is expected to increase by 68% over the next 30 years. The current economic burden of dementia and other dementia subtypes is evaluated at $818 billion, with projections expecting cost to rise to $2 trillion by the year 2030. In Singapore specifically, the estimated cost of dementia was reported at $1.4 billion per year, with costs expecting to rise in tandem with Singapore's rapidly aging population. Given the impact and impending threats of neurocognitive decline, it is clear that intentional efforts to combat neurocognitive decline is necessary.

To date, experts in the field have yet to identify specific causes of neurocognitive decline. This is due to the heterogeneity of neurocognitive decline and the diseases associated with it. As such, it has been challenging to find definitive causes and cures for neurocognitive decline. That said, there are several risk factors associated with neurocognitive decline and dementia. Risk factors such as age and genetics are fairly predictive of neurocognitive decline, but are, by nature, unmodifiable. However, risk factors such as, but not limited to, cardiovascular problems, physical activity, cognitive training, and social engagement are possible and much easier to modify. Hence, there has been a preponderance of interventions in the field that targets those specific modifiable risk factors with the intention of manipulating current or future neurocognitive outcomes. For example, cognitive training (CT) has been a target for interventions that promote the delay and/or prevention of neurocognitive decline. Over the past few decades, CT programs in the field have evolved to computerized, gamified, and self-manned versions that usually target specific areas of cognition such as memory, attention, decision-making, inhibition, or a combination of those areas.

Similarly, physical activity (PA) has also been a target for interventions that promote the delay and/or prevention of neurocognitive decline. Studies with PA-specific interventions have also shown to positively influence neurocognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment, as well as those who are at risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease. Evidence also show that PA can delay the effects of neurocognitive decline in patients with existing cognitive decline, dementia, and other dementia subtypes.

Interestingly, there has been a recent surge of interventions in the field that amalgamates both PA and CT elements. This shift in direction in the field acknowledges the symbiotic relationship between CT and PA with regards to neurocognitive outcome. Many of these studies set out to investigate the effects of 'exergaming' (a portmanteau of exercise and gaming) on neurocognitive function in the older adult population with varying neurocognitive capacity ranging from healthy to declining. Exergaming interventions have shown to improve the subjects' executive function and cognitive performance after the intervention period as compared to the subject controls. The effects of exergaming interventions were also able to delay the onset of mild cognitive impairment in healthy subjects as compared to the healthy controls in some studies. That said, such programs are still limited by factors such as poor personalization capabilities, substandard controls, and high attrition rates (lack of participant engagement). Additionally, studies of such nature are far and few between in Asia, making it unclear if similar results can be replicated in an Asian-majority demographic like Singapore.

To address these issues, the current study aims to use a novel personalized multimodal physical and cognitive brain computer interface (BCI) training system to delay and/or prevent neurocognitive decline, and enhance neurocognitive function. The investigators' proposed training system integrates a stationary cycling intervention and a corresponding personalized BCI cognitive training program. The BCI cognitive training program uses machine learning technologies and elderly-friendly user-interface/user-experience (UI/UX) game design to actively track individual neurocognitive status, provide feedback in real-time, and encourage older adults to persist in training for the long term. The investigators also seek to customize the program's UI/UX by employing locally-relevant materials to reduce accessibility barriers and increase participant engagement. For the purposes of this study, all instructions and interventions will be delivered in English. However, there are plans for future iterations of this program to include other local languages to facilitate the use of the program by non-English speaking Singaporean elderly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

237

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169857
        • Recruiting
        • Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tih Shih Lee, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Physically healthy adults from 50 to 75 years old.
  2. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) >= 24.
  3. Able to travel to study site independently.
  4. Literate in English.
  5. BMI within acceptable range (BMI scores from 18.5 to 24.9).
  6. Able to cycle on the NeeuroCycle recumbent bicycle device at a comfortable pace for a continuous period of three minutes without experiencing symptoms of severe breathlessness, fatigue, and pain.
  7. Fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (Government Approved Vaccines ONLY; at least two weeks from the date of the second vaccination)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any known neuropsychiatric disorders (such as dementia, epilepsy or mental retardation).
  2. Presence of end stage lung, cardiac, liver, and/or renal disease.
  3. Experienced any cerebrovascular and/or cardiac events in the last 6 months.
  4. Have active arthritis.
  5. Uncorrected gross hearing, visual and/or speech impairments.
  6. Prone to vertigo, motion sickness, and/or migraine episodes.
  7. Highly physically active.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Multimodal Training
The participants in the Multimodal training arm (mBCI) will undergo 48 physical and cognitive training sessions over 24 weeks on the NeeuroCycle BCI Physical and Cognitive training system. Sessions are scheduled three times a week for the first 12 weeks and then once a week for the subsequent 12 weeks. Sessions are spaced at least one day apart and will take about one hour per session.The mBCI training program will deliver cognitive training modules in tandem with a stationary cycling regime. The cognitive training program consists of six different gamified tasks that target attention, immediate/working and delayed memory, decision-making, and visuospatial abilities delivered on an electronic tablet. The cycling regime is divided into seven non-consecutive sections. The participant will be tasked to complete a cognitive training activity that will last about 2-3 minutes between each cycling session.
The NeeuroCycle Physical and Cognitive Training System is a novel multimodal electroencephalogram (EEG)-based physical and cognitive training device. The system mainly comprises of a recumbent bicycle device and a customized four frontal electrode EEG-headband paired with the gamified NeeuroCycle cognitive training program delivered via an electronic application (app) on a tablet. The cognitive training program is built upon patented EEG-based attention, learning, and memory algorithms.
EXPERIMENTAL: Neurocognitive-Training only
The participants in the Neurocognitive training-only arm (nBCI) will undergo 48 cognitive training sessions over 24 weeks on the NeeuroCycle BCI Cognitive training system. The sessions are scheduled three times a week for the first 12 weeks and then once a week for the subsequent 12 weeks. Sessions are spaced at least one day apart and will take about one hour per session. The nBCI training protocol will deliver cognitive training modules that consists of six different gamified tasks that target attention, immediate/working and delayed memory, decision-making, and visuospatial abilities delivered on an electronic tablet. Participants will navigate the virtual space of the cognitive training program by using arrow keys on the tablet.
The NeeuroCycle Cognitive Training System is a novel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based cognitive training device. The system mainly comprises of a customized four frontal electrode EEG-headband paired with the gamified NeeuroCycle cognitive training program delivered via an electronic application (app) on a tablet. The cognitive training program is built upon patented EEG-based attention, learning, and memory algorithms.
NO_INTERVENTION: Active Control
The participants in the Active Control arm (AC) will undergo 48 sessions over 24 weeks. The sessions are scheduled three times a week for the first 12 weeks and then once a week for the subsequent 12 weeks. Sessions are spaced at least one day apart and will take about one hour per session. Participants in this arm will view informative documentaries on an electronic tablet and answer three general questions about documentary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repeatable Battery for the Assessement Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
Time Frame: Comparison in the change of RBANS total score from pre-treatment (Week 1; Session 1) to mid-treatment (Week 12; Session 36) to post-treatment (Week 24; Session 48) among all three study arms.
The RBANS test provides reliable and well-validated assessments of five different cognitive domains including: language, attention, visuospatial awareness, immediate, and delayed memory.
Comparison in the change of RBANS total score from pre-treatment (Week 1; Session 1) to mid-treatment (Week 12; Session 36) to post-treatment (Week 24; Session 48) among all three study arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events Reported
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention period (Up to 24 weeks) for all three study arms.
To record the number of adverse events/serious adverse events reported.
Throughout the intervention period (Up to 24 weeks) for all three study arms.
Systems Usability Scale
Time Frame: Two intervention groups(mBCI and nBCI): Post-intervention(Week 24; Session 48)
Participants will rate their agreeableness on 10 statements regarding their satisfaction and ease of use of the training components on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also answer three qualitative questions regarding their satisfaction and ease of use.
Two intervention groups(mBCI and nBCI): Post-intervention(Week 24; Session 48)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tih Shih Lee, MD/PhD, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 17, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on NeeuroCycle Physical and Cognitive Training System

3
Subscribe