- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05178966
Evaluation of Efficiency of One Day Patient/Caregiver Psychoeducation on the Caregiver's Burden (BP ONEDAY)
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Day Patient-caregiver Psychoeducationnal Program on the Burden of Caregivers
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Bipolar disorder (BD) has a huge impact on patient lives and their relatives. BD psychoeducation has been shown to be effective on patient disease course and caregivers burden. However, the programs offered appear to be incompatible with the participants obligations and services requirements. In this context we wanted to develop a "minute" program (Bp one day).
Study participation includes 3 visits : inclusion visit and 2 follow up visits.
The main objective is to assess the effectiveness of day psychoeducational program (BP OneDay) on caregiver burden at one month according to the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZCBI) total score.
This study also aims to assess the effectiveness of BP OneDay on caregiver stigma, patient self-stigma and medication adherence, quality of life, and bipolar disorder knowledge.
The study is an open-label randomized controlled trial with two arms
Overall, 120 dyads will be recruited randomly affected in 2 groups :
- the interventional group will benefit from a day psychoeducational program : Bp oneDay
- the control group will be placed on the waiting list
The benefits expected from Bp OneDay are to reduce caregiver burden and stigma and improve knowledge about BD. For patients, we expect improve disease understanding, drug adherence and reduce self-stigmatization. If the results are promising, this program can be widely disseminated and thus increase cares' solution for patients and relatives in large urban centers.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kathlyne DUPUIS MAURIN
- Phone Number: +33467335663
- Email: k-dupuis@chu-montpellier.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: maude SENEQUE
- Phone Number: +33467335663
- Email: m-senequehaize@chu-montpellier.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France
- Recruiting
- University Hospital of Montpellier
-
Contact:
- Gaëlle MARTINEZ-TARQUINI
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Patient inclusion Criteria:
- Be over 18 years old;
- Meet the criteria for bipolar disorder (I, II, unspecified) according to the DSM-5 criteria;
- Be able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study;
- Presence of a caregiver
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject unable to adhere to the group requirements (cognitive disorder, decompensated mood state ...);
- Subject protected by law (subject under guardianship and / or guardianship) or deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision;
- Subject unable to understand, speak and write French;
- Subject in a period of exclusion from another protocol.
- Subject not having signed an informed consent
- Subject not affiliated with a social security scheme or such a scheme
Caregiver inclusion criteria ;
- Subject over 18 years old;
- Subject designated as a regular caregiver of a patient with bipolar disorder. A regular caregiver is a trusted person designated by the patient as being one of his main support, having knowledge of the diagnosis of bipolar disorder and who can be called upon in the context of care.
- Subject able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study;
Caregiver exclusion criteria :
- Subject unable to adhere to the groupre quirements (cognitive disorder, decompensated mood state ...);
- Subject protected by law (subject under guardianship and / or curatorship) or deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision ;
- Subject unable to understand, speak and write French;
- Subject in a period of exclusion from another protocol.
- Subject not having signed an informed consent
- Subject not affiliated with a social security scheme or such a scheme
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Bp OneDay programm
The BP One-Day program is based on a single day of psychoeducation .
|
The BP One-Day Psychoeducation program is based on a single day of psychoeducation . This program was carried out by members of the bipolar expert center network in various hospitals of the network and included :
Each BP One-Day psychoeducation session welcomes an average of ten participants (5 patients / 5 caregivers). At the end of the day, participants receive a booklet containing the main information of the day. BP One-Day program is delivered by a nurse and a psychologist specialized in both BD and therapy group facilitation. A specialized psychiatrist intervenes in the section "Medication treatments and medication adherence" for a period of approximately one hour. |
NO_INTERVENTION: Waiting List
Patients assigned in control group will be placed in waiting list and will benefit from the program after their participation to this study.
During study participation, they will receive treatment as usual.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
caregivers burden
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
evaluation of caregiver burden based on the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview total score. The Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview is a self-administered questionnaire assessing caregiver burden using 22 items. Five themes are examined: psychological and physical suffering, financial, relational and social difficulties. For each of the 22 items, the caregiver determines how often he feels a given emotion in the helping relationship. This frequency ranges from 0 "never" to 4 "Almost always". The overall score is obtained by adding all the items together, it varies from 0 to 88. The higher the score, the greater the burden felt by the caregiver. |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
caregivers stigmatization
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
évaluation of caregivers stigmatization using Affiliate stigma scale on caregivers of people with mental illness The Affiliate stigma scale on caregivers of people with mental illness is a self-questionnaire composed of 22 items assessing 3 dimensions of stigma : the cognitive, affective and behavioral dimension.
Participants are asked to rate their level of agreement with the statements on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 "Strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree).
The total score ranges from 22 to 88.
The higher the score, the more severe the stigma.
|
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
caregivers stigmatization
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
évaluation of caregivers stigmatization using Affiliate stigma scale on caregivers of people with mental illness The Affiliate stigma scale on caregivers of people with mental illness is a self-questionnaire composed of 22 items assessing 3 dimensions of stigma : the cognitive, affective and behavioral dimension.
Participants are asked to rate their level of agreement with the statements on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 "Strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree).
The total score ranges from 22 to 88.
The higher the score, the more severe the stigma.
|
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Internalized Stigma of patients
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
evaluation of Internalized Stigma according to the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness total score This self-questionnaire consists of 29 items.
Each item is rated using a 4-points Likert scale ranging from 1 "Strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree".
The 29 items are grouped according to 5 themes: alienation (the fact of not feeling a full member of the society in which we live), approval of stereotypes, perceived discrimination, social withdrawal, and resistance to stigma.
The higher the score, the more severe the self-stigma.
|
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Internalized Stigma of patients
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
evaluation of Internalized Stigma according to the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness total score This self-questionnaire consists of 29 items.
Each item is rated using a 4-points Likert scale ranging from 1 "Strongly disagree" to 4 "Strongly agree".
The 29 items are grouped according to 5 themes: alienation (the fact of not feeling a full member of the society in which we live), approval of stereotypes, perceived discrimination, social withdrawal, and resistance to stigma.
The higher the score, the more severe the self-stigma.
|
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of patient quality of life according to the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form total score. This 16-items self-administered questionnaire assesses the quality of life through the assessment of physical health, social relationships, family relationships, mood, libido, the ability to function on a daily basis, the ability to invest and enjoy leisure time, to work, the economic level, the place of life and the general feeling of well-being. The last two items assess satisfaction with treatment as well as satisfaction with life and are treated independently of the others. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and represents the level of satisfaction experienced over the last week. A calculation of the overall score is performed for items 1 to 14 (ranging from 14 to 70) and is expressed as a percentage (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. |
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Evaluation of patient quality of life according to the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form total score. This 16-items self-administered questionnaire assesses the quality of life through the assessment of physical health, social relationships, family relationships, mood, libido, the ability to function on a daily basis, the ability to invest and enjoy leisure time, to work, the economic level, the place of life and the general feeling of well-being. The last two items assess satisfaction with treatment as well as satisfaction with life and are treated independently of the others. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and represents the level of satisfaction experienced over the last week. A calculation of the overall score is performed for items 1 to 14 (ranging from 14 to 70) and is expressed as a percentage (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
caregivers quality of life
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of caregivers quality of life according to the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form total score. This 16-items self-administered questionnaire assesses the quality of life through the assessment of physical health, social relationships, family relationships, mood, libido, the ability to function on a daily basis, the ability to invest and enjoy leisure time, to work, the economic level, the place of life and the general feeling of well-being. The last two items assess satisfaction with treatment as well as satisfaction with life and are treated independently of the others. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and represents the level of satisfaction experienced over the last week. A calculation of the overall score is performed for items 1 to 14 (ranging from 14 to 70) and is expressed as a percentage (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. |
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
caregivers quality of life
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Evaluation of caregivers quality of life according to the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form total score. This 16-items self-administered questionnaire assesses the quality of life through the assessment of physical health, social relationships, family relationships, mood, libido, the ability to function on a daily basis, the ability to invest and enjoy leisure time, to work, the economic level, the place of life and the general feeling of well-being. The last two items assess satisfaction with treatment as well as satisfaction with life and are treated independently of the others. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and represents the level of satisfaction experienced over the last week. A calculation of the overall score is performed for items 1 to 14 (ranging from 14 to 70) and is expressed as a percentage (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life. |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of patient medication adherence according to Medication Adherence Rating Scale total score. This self-questionnaire has 10 yes / no items. The total score varies between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the better the compliance. This scale was created and is widely used in the psychiatric population. |
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Evaluation of patient medication adherence according to Medication Adherence Rating Scale total score. This self-questionnaire has 10 yes / no items. The total score varies between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the better the compliance. This scale was created and is widely used in the psychiatric population. |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Bipolar disorder Knowledge in patients
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of Bipolar Disorde knowledge in patients according to "Quizz BP" total score. This self-administered questionnaire is composed of twenty true or false questions. It addresses different themes: occurrence, etiology, semiology, factors triggering episodes, comorbidities, treatments. The overall score fluctuates between 0 and 20. Although this test has not been validated, it has already been used in several published works |
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Bipolar disorder Knowledge in patients
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Evaluation of Bipolar Disorde knowledge in patients according to "Quizz BP" total score. This self-administered questionnaire is composed of twenty true or false questions. It addresses different themes: occurrence, etiology, semiology, factors triggering episodes, comorbidities, treatments. The overall score fluctuates between 0 and 20. Although this test has not been validated, it has already been used in several published works |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Bipolar disorder Knowledge in caregivers
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of Bipolar Disorde knowledge in caregivers according to "Quizz BP" total score. This self-administered questionnaire is composed of twenty true or false questions. It addresses different themes: occurrence, etiology, semiology, factors triggering episodes, comorbidities, treatments. The overall score fluctuates between 0 and 20. Although this test has not been validated, it has already been used in several published works |
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Bipolar disorder Knowledge in caregivers
Time Frame: Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Evaluation of Bipolar Disorde knowledge in caregivers according to "Quizz BP" total score. This self-administered questionnaire is composed of twenty true or false questions. It addresses different themes: occurrence, etiology, semiology, factors triggering episodes, comorbidities, treatments. The overall score fluctuates between 0 and 20. Although this test has not been validated, it has already been used in several published works |
Day65 for experimental group, Day35 for control group
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the group according to a liker score ranged from 0 "absolutely not satisfied" to 10 "Extremely satisfied"
|
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
caregiver satisfaction
Time Frame: Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Evaluation of caregiver satisfaction with the group according to a liker score ranged from 0 "absolutely not satisfied" to 10 "Extremely satisfied"
|
Day44 for experimental group, Day14 for control group
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-A01317-34 (OTHER: ANSM)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Type I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder Mild | Bipolar Disorder Moderate | Bipolar Disorder SevereUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterThe Ryan Licht Sang Bipolar FoundationCompletedBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder I | Bipolar Affective DisorderUnited States
-
University of PittsburghNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionCompletedBipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Disorder NOSUnited States
-
Region StockholmKarolinska InstitutetRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Affective Disorder; Remission in | Bipolar Affective Disorder, Currently Depressed, ModerateSweden
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Hospital Moinhos de VentoActive, not recruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Major Depressive Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Affective Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderBrazil
-
Medical University of South CarolinaMilken InstituteCompletedBipolar Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderUnited States
-
Joshua RosenblatRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderCanada
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedMajor Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I and Bipolar IIUnited States
-
Joshua RosenblatRecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderCanada
-
Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.University of MinnesotaCompletedMajor Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I and Bipolar IIUnited States
Clinical Trials on Bp OneDay psychoeducation program
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityCompletedElderly People | Depressive Symptoms | DespondencyTurkey
-
University of California, San FranciscoAmerican Heart Association; American Medical Association; OCHIN, Inc.; Louisiana...Active, not recruiting
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingHypertension | High Blood PressureUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongEducation Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative...UnknownPregnancyHong Kong
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityMount Saint Vincent UniversityCompletedTrauma, Psychological | Military Family | Veterans FamilyCanada
-
University of CagliariCompletedSchizophrenia and Related Disorders | Patient Non-ComplianceItaly
-
University of Maryland, College ParkCompletedAnxiety | Behavioral InhibitionUnited States
-
Marmara UniversityTurkish Spinal Cord Paralysis AssociationCompletedAdolescent | Education | Psychological | Physically Disabled | Sexual HealthTurkey
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHospital Authority, Hong Kong; Jilin Medical College, China; Taipei Medical University...CompletedSchizophreniaHong Kong, China, Taiwan
-
Kırıkkale UniversityCompleted