Using Next-generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Epilepsy and/or Intellectual Disability in a Pediatric Cohorte

January 3, 2022 updated by: calina TODOSI, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

The Performance of Next-generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Epilepsy and/or Intellectual Disability in the Pediatric Cohort of the Regional University Hospital Center of Nancy

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims:

To determine the diagnostic performance of the epilepsy and intellectual disability panel used in the pediatric population, starting in June 2019, at the Regional University Hospital Center of Nancy, France.

Design:

An observational and retrospective study, at the Regional University Hospital Center of Nancy, France.

Materials and Methods:

Pediatric patients who underwent genetic analysis with the epilepsy-intellectual disability gene panel. All of these patients were either epileptic or had intellectual disability, or both, of undetermined etiology.

Results:

We included 69 patients in this study. We identified causative mutations in 46.4% (32 of 69 patients) of this cohort after the gene panel and 52.2% (36 patients) including positive results after realization of the Clinical Exome Solution.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Epilepsy and intellectual disability are common and highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Their respective prevalence are 3.2 to 5.1/1000 (1,2) and 1.3 to 2.2% (3).

An epileptic seizure is due to abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity. Epilepsy is defined by : (A) At least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring >24 h apart; or (B) one unprovoked (or reflex) seizure and a probability of further seizures at least 60% ; or (C) diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome (4). Intellectual disability (ID) is defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), as a significant limitation in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior, which include conceptual, social, and practical skills, arising before age 18.

These two conditions can be caused by a variety of environmental and genetic factors, often combined, making the diagnosis difficult (5,6). Standard diagnostic approaches include biochemical and enzyme analysis for neurometabolic disorders, MRI brain imaging and genome-wide microarray analysis (7-9).

Because of the large variability of genotypic-phenotypic expression (a syndrome can have several genetic causes; the same gene can be expressed in different ways) and the huge genetic heterogeneity, the identification of the genes involved in these pathologies has long been difficult. In recent decades, considerable progress has been made in genetics, with the development of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). These new techniques permit the sequencing of many genes at the same time, at an ever lower cost, allowing the use of these tests in clinical practice routine with gene panels, and even whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing (10). We now identified more than 1000 genes implicated in mechanisms of epilepsy and ID, with various pathways (11-16).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France, 54500
        • Calina Todosi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Of the 69 patients included in the study, the majority were boys, 62.3% (43 patients) and 37.7% were girls (26 patients). This difference is most pronounced in the subcategory of patients with intellectual disabilities, with a sex ratio of approximately 1:2,3. The median age of the population at inclusion was 5 years [2.2-17].

From the total of 69 patients included in our study, the majority beneficiated of the gene panel for their intellectual disability (37 patients i.e. 53.6%), 13 for their epilepsy (18.8% of the patients) and 19 patients had both (i.e. 27.5%).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We included in our study all pediatric patients who underwent genetic analysis with the epilepsy-intellectual disability gene panel between June 2019 and May 2021. All of these patients were either epileptic or had intellectual disability, or both, of undetermined or genetic presumed etiology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We excluded i) patients older than 18 years, ii) those for whom the indication for genetic analysis was not epilepsy or intellectual disability iii) patients not followed up at the Regional University Hospital Center of Nancy, France.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Epilepsy only
Epilepsy only patients who underwent our gene panel and the Clinical exome Solution
retrospective analysis of a exome clinical solution
Intelectual Disability only
Intelectual Disability only patients who underwent our gene panel and the Clinical exome Solution
retrospective analysis of a exome clinical solution
Epilepsy and Intelectual Disability
Intelectual Disability and Epilepsy patients who underwent our gene panel and the Clinical exome Solution
retrospective analysis of a exome clinical solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
determine the pourcentage of positive résults using our epilepsy and intellectual disability panel
Time Frame: 2 years
the pourcentage of positive résultats after the panel analysis
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of supplementary positive results of the CES
Time Frame: 2 years
the pourcentage of positive résultats found using the CES and witch were negatif using the panel
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on retrospective analysis of a panel result

Subscribe