Efficacy Study in Phytotherapy of an Association of Plants in the Improvement of Psychological Well-being (ROSADE)

July 10, 2025 updated by: Larena SAS
The objective of the study is to compare the effect of a 6-week supplementation with a dietary supplement based on plant extracts to the effect of placebo, in patients with a moderate depressive episode (F32.1 by ICD10 definition) and with moderate symptoms (score HAM-D ≥ 16 and ≤ 23).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Longitudinal, comparative, randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study in 2 parallel groups, double-blind, monocentre, aimed at demonstrating the superiority of the combination of plants over placebo on depressive symptoms.

Each patient will be followed for a maximum of 6 weeks, with 3 visits to the doctor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
        • CICN - Université Catholique de Louvain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old ;
  • Patient with a moderate depressive episode (F32.1 by ICD10 definition) ;
  • Score HAM-D ≥ 16 and ≤ 23 at inclusion, corresponding to moderate symptoms ;
  • Recent depression (less than 6 months), not managed by antidepressant or psychotherapeutic treatment ;
  • Depressive disorder not requiring, in the opinion of the investigator, initiation of antidepressant drug therapy ;
  • Patient able to understand the study information, read the information leaflet, and willing to sign the consent form ;
  • French speaking patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a depressive disorder of another nature or any other mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolarity, alcohol or drug addiction, etc.);
  • Patient at risk of suicide (noted by the investigator, or HAM-D item 3 score > 2) or having attempted suicide in the last 5 years;
  • Depression felt for more than 6 months ;
  • Patient under psychotropic treatment (current or in the month preceding inclusion) (neuroleptic, anxiolytic, hypnotic);
  • Patient on beta-blocker therapy ;
  • Patient on dialysis ;
  • Patient using products containing piperine or St. John's wort, or having a known effect on mood in the last 30 days ;
  • Woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding, or has plans to become pregnant in the next 8 weeks ;
  • Patient with an allergy or contraindication to one of the components of the product under study (rhodiola or saffron) ;
  • Patient unable to understand information related to the study (mental or linguistic disability) ;
  • Patient participating or having participated in the previous 3 months in another clinical trial ;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dietary supplement group
2 tablets / day for 6 weeks of the dietary supplement (Rhodiola rosea L. and Crocus sativus L.), to be taken every day in the morning with a large glass of water, from D1 to D42.
Dietary supplement under study is based on Rhodiola rosea L. and Crocus sativus L. extracts
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
2 tablets / day for 6 weeks of the placebo, to be taken every day in the morning with a large glass of water, from D1 to D42.
Placebo of the dietary supplement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of depressive symptoms through Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) at the end of the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Score HAM-D at D42, adjusted to the value at D0 minimum = 0 and maximum = 53 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of depressive symptoms through HAM-D during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of score HAM-D between D0, D21 and D42
42 days
Evolution of depressive symptoms through HAM-D sub-scores during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of sub-scores HAM-D between D0, D21 and D42
42 days
Rate of responding participants (decrease of ≥ 3 points) at D21
Time Frame: 21 days
HAM-D score showing a decrease of ≥ 3 points compared to D0
21 days
Rate of responding participants (decrease of ≥ 3 points) at D42
Time Frame: 42 days
HAM-D score showing a decrease of ≥ 3 points compared to D0
42 days
Rate of responding participants (decrease of ≥ 5 points) at D21
Time Frame: 21 days
HAM-D score showing a decrease of ≥ 5 points compared to D0
21 days
Rate of responding participants (decrease of ≥ 5 points) at D42
Time Frame: 42 days
HAM-D score showing a decrease of ≥ 5 points compared to D0
42 days
Rate of participants in remission at D21
Time Frame: 21 days
score HAM-D ≤ 7
21 days
Rate of participants in remission at D42
Time Frame: 42 days
score HAM-D ≤ 7
42 days
Evolution of depressive symptoms through Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression (HADS-D) during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of sub-scores HADS-D between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 0 and maximum = 21 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Evolution of depressive symptoms through Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A) during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of sub-scores HADS-A between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 0 and maximum = 21 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Evolution of physician's general impression of the symptoms during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 1 and maximum = 7 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Evolution of physician's general impression of the symptoms evolution during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 1 and maximum = 7 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Evolution of patient's general impression of the symptoms evolution during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 1 and maximum = 7 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Adverse events
Time Frame: 42 days
Number and type of adverse events
42 days
Evolution of patient's functional disability in his or her professional, social and family life during the study
Time Frame: 42 days
Evolution of Sheehan Disability Score (SDS) between D0, D21 and D42 minimum = 0 and maximum = 44 higher score means a worse outcome
42 days
Patient satisfaction with complementation at D21
Time Frame: 21 days
5-point Likert scale (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5) higher score means a better satisfaction
21 days
Patient satisfaction with complementation at D42
Time Frame: 42 days
5-point Likert scale
42 days
Number of intercurrent visits
Time Frame: 42 days
Number of intercurrent visits
42 days
Concomitant drug use
Time Frame: 42 days
Number and type of concomitant drugs
42 days
Compliance at D21
Time Frame: 21 days
Counting of therapeutic units at D21
21 days
Compliance at D42
Time Frame: 42 days
Counting of therapeutic units at D42
42 days
Management prescribed or advised at the end of follow-up
Time Frame: 42 days
Rate of participants on the same dietary supplement, antidepressant medication, other or without treatment at the end of the study
42 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PiL-Clin-ROSADE-021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Well-being

Clinical Trials on Dietary supplement

Subscribe