- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05200702
Assessment of Safety and Acute Effects of a Knee-hip Powered Soft Exoskeleton in Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders (Exo-NMD1)
The aims of the current study are as follow:
i) Evaluate the safety, usability, and acute efficiency of a powered knee-hip dermoskeleton (MyoSuit, MyoSwiss, Zurich, Switzerland) in patients with neuromuscular disorders, ii) Elaborate recommendations regarding usability criteria for safe and efficient use the device in patients with neuromuscular disorders (e.g. type and severity of patient's functional deficits), iii) generate necessary data to foresee a future study involving a home use of the device and assessment of long-term benefits.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients with neuromuscular disorders display different type of symptoms depending on the type of pathology. Diseases like facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD), limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD2b), sporadic inclusion body myositis (SIBM) or Pompe disease (PD) are characterized by severe muscle weakness leading to reduced functional capacities. This leads to a dramatic decrease of quality of life (e.g. reduced autonomy/participation, social isolation, depression) associated with increased fall risk and complications (e.g. trauma, cardio-vascular issues, trauma, chronic pain, loss of bone mass, and weight gain).
However, a residual of level of strength and residual function may be maintained over years, even at severe disease stages allowing transfers and ambulation. However, the maintenance of this type of activity is often associated with substantial compensatory movements, leading to high load on joints, orthopedic complications, and high fall-risk.
In contrast to traditional passive assistive devices such as orthoses, powered assistive devices, frequently termed dermo- or exoskeletons, have a very high potential for compensating muscle weakness and regain mobility and independence. Devices such as the ReWalk or the Indego use rigid structures, in parallel to the user's legs, and electric motors to stabilize the human against gravity during standing and walking. Thus far, these systems have been used mostly in clinical environments for gait rehabilitation in neurological conditions (e.g. spinal cord injury, post-stroke syndrome). Their weight, which can range from 13 to 48 kg , can make them difficult to use and transport, thus limiting their applicability beyond clinical environments. However, for assistive devices to be used in everyday life, they must provide assistance across activities of daily living (ADLs) in an unobtrusive manner.
Wearable motion assistance systems, especially those dedicated to lower limbs are highly promising for ambulant patients with neuromuscular disorders (e.g. FSHD, LGMD, SIBM or PD). In these conditions, the prevalence of lower-limb muscle weakness, in particular in proximal muscle groups (i.e. providing strength/torque to hips and knees) is very high. Schmidt et al. recently introduced a powered knee-hip soft exoskeleton (the Myosuit), a soft, wearable device designed to provide continuous assistance at the hip and knee joint when working with and against gravity in ADLs. This robotic device combines active and passive elements with a closed-loop force controller designed to behave like an external muscle (exomuscle) and deliver gravity compensation to the user. With 5.6 kg including batteries, the Myosuit is one of the lightest untethered devices capable of delivering gravity support to the user's knee and hip joints. In healthy subject, the Myosuit has been shown to effectively assist its users in gravity-intensive ADLs, such as sitting transfers. However, the effect of the device on movement parameters and user perception must be clarified. We believe that ambulant patients with neuromuscular disorders can highly benefit from a system that provides mobility assistance like the Myosuit. The use of such a device has the potential to shift the loss of ambulation/transfer abilities to a higher age and might mitigate disease progression and occurrence of complications. Whether the Myosuit may be safe, usable, and efficient in ambulant patients with neuromuscular disorders, remain to be specifically investigated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75013
- Institute of Myology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years and < 70 years of age
- Height between 1.50 m and 1.95 m
- Weight between 45 kg and 110 kg
- Abdominal perimeter < 125 cm
- Written informed consent
- Affiliate or beneficiary of a social security scheme
- Able to comply with all protocol requirements
Confirmed diagnosis of a pathology belonging to one of the following family*:
Primary disorders of muscles
- Muscular dystrophy
- Congenital myopathies
- Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy
- Mitochondrial myopathies
Metabolic disorders
- Inborn errors of metabolism
- Glycogen storage disease
Functional capacities:
- Able to stand up from a chair with armrest without other supports at least 3 times and at most 15 times in 30 seconds.
- Report the ability to walk without the assistance of a person at least 2min
- The use of traditional orthoses and walking aids will be accepted excepted knee orthoses and walkers (e.g. canes/crutches, ankle foot orthosis).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to participate in the study
- Inability to comply with protocol requirements
- Guardianship/trusteeship
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Unstable Cardiomyopathy
- Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
- Medical history of osteoporotic fracture
- Balance disorder with extra neuromuscular causes
- Recent trauma (fall, accident, ...)
- Unstable Cardiomyopathy
- Severe respiratory insufficiency
- Flexion contracture in the knee and hip joint in excess of 10°
- Varus malposition in excess of 10° or valgus malposition in excess of 10°
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Knee-hip Powered Soft Exoskeleton
Patients and healthy subjects will use a Knee-hip Powered Soft Exoskeleton to perform different standardised tasks
|
Patients and healthy subjects will wear the movement assistance device to perform different standardised physical evaluations.
|
|
No Intervention: No assistance device
Patients and healthy subjects will perform different standardised tasks without Knee-hip Powered Soft Exoskeleton
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Absence of adverse effect attributable to the use of the device during task performed within a knee-hip powered soft exoskeleton
Time Frame: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Variation in the 2 Minutes Walking Test distance (express in meters) when performed using versus not using the device
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Variation in the 10 Meters Walking Test performance (express in seconds) when performed using versus not using the device
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Difference of performance with and without the device during 30 Sit To Stand
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Difference of performance with and without the device during simple Sit To Stand
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Difference of performance with and without the device during the squating test
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Difference of performance with and without the device during Time Up & Go test
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Difference of performance with and without the device during stairs climbing test
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Variation in spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 2 Minutes Walking Test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Spatiotemporal gait parameters: Cadence, Gait Speed, Step Duration, Stride Length, Cadence Asymmetry, Gait Speed Asymmetry, Stance Asymmetry, Stride Length Asymmetry
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Variation in spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 10 Meters Walking Test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Spatiotemporal gait parameters: Cadence, Gait Speed, Step Duration, Stride Length, Cadence Asymmetry, Gait Speed Asymmetry, Stance Asymmetry, Stride Length Asymmetry
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Variation in kinematics parameters during 30 Sit To Stand with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee & Knee-Ankle Plots
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Variation in kinematics parameters during unique Sit To Stand with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee & Knee-Ankle Plots
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Variation in kinematics parameters during Time Up & Go evaluation with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee & Knee-Ankle Plots
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Variation in kinematics parameters during stairs climbing test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee & Knee-Ankle Plots
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Modification of lower limb muscle recruitment measured by surface EMG with and without the device
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
|
Variation in postural stability measured by force platform with and without the device
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
Mean Velocity, RMS Sway
|
Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks
|
|
Modification in scoring of the device measured by the Modified Nordic Questionnaire
Time Frame: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
|
|
Positive scoring of device efficiency measured by the System usability scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
Through study completion, on average 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Metabolic Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System
- Muscular Disorders, Atrophic
- Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Mitochondrial Diseases
- Myotonic Disorders
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Muscular Dystrophies
- Muscular Diseases
- Myositis
- Glycogen Storage Disease
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Mitochondrial Myopathies
- Myotonia Congenita
Other Study ID Numbers
- Exo-NMD1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscular Dystrophies
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingLimb Girdle Muscular DystrophiesFrance
-
aTyr Pharma, Inc.CompletedLimb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies | Facioscapulohumeral Muscular DystrophyUnited States, Denmark, France
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesMuscular Dystrophy AssociationCompletedMuscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle (GENETICALLY CONFIRMED)United States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkRecruitingLimb Girdle Muscular DystrophyDenmark
-
ML Bio Solutions, Inc.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedMuscular Dystrophies | Limb Girdle Muscular DystrophyUnited States, Denmark
-
Neurogen Brain and Spine InstituteWithdrawn
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and other collaboratorsCompletedLimb-Girdle Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
Peking University First HospitalCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingLimb-girdle Muscular Dystrophy
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompleted